The Design of Large-Scale Complex Engineered Systems: Present Challenges and Future Promise

Large-Scale Complex Engineered Systems (LSCES) dominate the aerospace, maritime and nuclear industries. Systems such as aircraft carriers, nuclear power plants, spacecraft, and submarines represent several unique challenges for the engineering designer, as well as the systems engineer. These challenges include extraordinary costs and risks, and the inability to fully test and evaluate the complete system until it is nearly operational. These systems have become increasingly complex and sophisticated over the past fifty years, largely due to the sheer magnitude of inherent couplings that exist between disciplines, components, geographically-distributed organizations, and people. These systems are regularly prone to crippling time and cost overruns, largely due to the unintended consequences arising from unknown or unexpected interactions. The methods, processes and tools used by practitioners have not kept pace with the growing complexity of LSCES. Indeed, a complex system is now required in order to design and produce a complex system, where the elements of both draw just as heavily from social fields as they do from technical fields. This paper will explore the challenges that exist in the design of LSCES, the existing foundations from which we can draw to build a new framework for design of LSCES, and the research opportunities that will hopefully lead to new theories for the design of LSCES. This paper represents the opinions and vision of the authors, who recognize that the true challenge of advancing the design of LSCES will depend on the views and contributions of an extremely broad and diverse number of disciplines from technical and social fields.

[1]  T. Bayes An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances , 2003 .

[2]  Paul Collopy,et al.  The elephant in the mist: What we don't know about the design, development, test and management of complex systems , 2012 .

[3]  A. T. Bahill What is systems engineering , 1995 .

[4]  Dan Ward Don't Come to the Dark Side: Acquisition Lessons from a Galaxy Far, Far Away , 2011 .

[5]  Christiaan J. J. Paredis,et al.  Modeling and Simulation Methods for Design of Engineering Systems , 2001, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[6]  Bruce Bueno de Mesquita,et al.  An Introduction to Game Theory , 2014 .

[7]  Ken Binmore Playing for Real: A Text on Game Theory , 2007 .

[8]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking , 1992 .

[9]  T Haftka Raphael,et al.  Multidisciplinary aerospace design optimization: survey of recent developments , 1996 .

[10]  J. Car,et al.  Open disclosure: the only approach to medical error , 1999, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[11]  Paul Collopy,et al.  ECONOMIC-BASED DISTRIBUTED OPTIMAL DESIGN , 2001 .

[12]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  Modeling interactions in multidisciplinary design - A game theoretic approach , 1996 .

[13]  Emery Roe,et al.  High Reliability Management: Operating on the Edge , 2008 .

[14]  K. Weick Making Sense of the Organization , 2000 .

[15]  E. Rowland Theory of Games and Economic Behavior , 1946, Nature.

[16]  J. Neumann Zur Theorie der Gesellschaftsspiele , 1928 .

[17]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Game theory - Analysis of Conflict , 1991 .

[18]  Ronald A. Howard,et al.  The Foundations of Decision Analysis Revisited , 2007 .

[19]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  Ambiguity and choice in organizations , 1976 .

[20]  Irem Y. Tumer,et al.  Design of complex engineered systems , 2014, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[21]  Christina Bloebaum,et al.  NON-HIERARCHIC SYSTEM DECOMPOSITION IN STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION , 1992 .

[22]  Paul Collopy,et al.  The Distinct and Interrelated Roles of Value-Driven Design, Multidisciplinary Design Optimization, and Decision Analysis , 2012 .

[23]  P. Schulman,et al.  General attributes of safe organisations , 2004, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[24]  Christina Bloebaum,et al.  Coupling strength-based system reduction for complex engineering design , 1995 .

[25]  L. Kruschwitz,et al.  Daniel Bernoulli: Entwurf einer neuen Theorie zur Bewertung von Lotterien. “Specimen theoriae novae de mensura sortis”, Commentarii Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanae 1738, S. 175–192. Aus dem Lateinischen übersetzt , 1996 .

[26]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Multidisciplinary Design Optimization for Complex Engineered Systems Design: State of the Research and State of the Practice—Report From a National Science Foundation Workshop , 2011, DAC 2011.

[27]  K. Weick The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[28]  P. Thagard,et al.  Computational Philosophy of Science , 1988 .

[29]  J. Nash Equilibrium Points in N-Person Games. , 1950, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Detlof von Winterfeldt,et al.  Advances in decision analysis : from foundations to applications , 2007 .

[31]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  Structural optimization by generalized, multilevel decomposition , 1985 .

[32]  Steven E. Phelan,et al.  What Is Complexity Science, Really? , 2001 .

[33]  S. F.R.,et al.  An Essay towards solving a Problem in the Doctrine of Chances . By the late Rev . Mr . Bayes , communicated by Mr . Price , in a letter to , 1999 .

[34]  C Vick,et al.  GUIDELINES FOR TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS MAINTENANCE CONCEPT AND PLANS , 2002 .

[35]  Paul Collopy,et al.  Value-Driven Design , 2011 .

[36]  John C. Harsanyi,et al.  Games with Incomplete Information Played by "Bayesian" Players, I-III: Part I. The Basic Model& , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[37]  Melanie Mitchell,et al.  Complexity - A Guided Tour , 2009 .

[38]  D. Bernoulli Specimen theoriae novae de mensura sortis : translated into German and English , 1967 .

[39]  Christina Bloebaum,et al.  Application of global sensitivity equations in multidisciplinary aircraft synthesis , 1990 .