The Sources of Knowledge and the Value of Academic Patents

This paper aims at contributing to the literature on the determinants of patent value in two respects. It first puts forward new potential determinants of patent value which are mainly related to the identification of the institutional sources of knowledge and the geographical scope of patenting strategy. Second, it aims at validating the traditional and new determinants of patent value with academic patents. The empirical analysis focuses on 208 patent families applied by six main Belgian Universities. The patent value is approximated by the number of forward patent citations. The estimates confirm the role of most traditional determinants of patent value (e.g., backward citation and family size). Further, the new indicators underline the importance of identifying the institutional sources of knowledge. They provide a more in-depth view on the way non patent citations, backward patent citations, co-assignees, and the geographical scope for protection determine patent value. Policy implications emerge from these results, such as the benefit of local and international collaboration between public research organisations and the need to convince academic researchers with a high scientific profile in terms of publications to crystallize their tacit knowledge into high value academic patents.

[1]  Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  What Patent Data Reveal about Universities: The Case of Belgium , 2003 .

[2]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States , 2002 .

[3]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Innovation , 1997 .

[4]  Jean O. Lanjouw,et al.  Patent Protection in the Shadow of Infringement: Simulation Estimations of Patent Value , 1998 .

[5]  M. Meyer Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature , 2000 .

[6]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  The Quality of Ideas: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators , 1999 .

[7]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Learning to Patent: Institutional Experience, Learning, and the Characteristics of U.S. University Patents After the Bayh-Dole Act, 1981-1992 , 2002 .

[8]  J. Lerner The Importance of Patent Scope: An Empirical Analysis , 1994 .

[9]  Dominique Guellec,et al.  The Value of Patents and Patenting Strategies: Countries and Technology Areas Patterns , 2002 .

[10]  A. Jaffe Real Effects of Academic Research , 1989 .

[11]  Ariel Pakes,et al.  Estimates of the Value of Patent Rights in European Countries During Thepost-1950 Period , 1985 .

[12]  A. Jaffe The U.S. patent system in transition: policy innovation and the innovation process , 2000 .

[13]  Eleftherios Sapsalis,et al.  Insight into the patenting performance of Belgian universities , 2003 .

[14]  Scott Shane,et al.  Technological Opportunities and New Firm Creation , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[15]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Technology policy for a world of skew-distributed outcomes , 2000 .

[16]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Citations, Family Size, Opposition and the Value of Patent Rights Have Profited from Comments and Suggestions , 2002 .

[17]  A. Pakes,et al.  The Value of Patents as Indicators of Inventive Activity , 1986 .

[18]  M. Trajtenberg A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[19]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Patents: Recent Trends and Puzzles , 1989 .

[20]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 19651988 , 1995, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[21]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980 , 2001 .

[22]  Z. Griliches Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[23]  Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  Applications, grants and the value of patent , 2000 .

[24]  Ariel Pakes,et al.  Patent Renewal Data , 1989 .

[25]  Josh Lerner,et al.  The Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights: A Survey of the Empirical Literature , 1997 .

[26]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  Changes in university patent quality after the Bayh-Dole act: a re-examination , 2003 .

[27]  J. Lanjouw,et al.  Patent Protection: Of What Value and for How Long? , 1993 .

[28]  Jean O. Lanjouw,et al.  How to Count Patents and Value Intellectual Property: Uses of Patent Renewal and Application Data , 1996 .