Digital volume correlation and micro-CT: An in-vitro technique for measuring full-field interface micromotion around polyethylene implants.

Micromotion around implants is commonly measured using displacement-sensor techniques. Due to the limitations of these techniques, an alternative approach (DVC-μCT) using digital volume correlation (DVC) and micro-CT (μCT) was developed in this study. The validation consisted of evaluating DVC-μCT based micromotion against known micromotions (40, 100 and 150 μm) in a simplified experiment. Subsequently, a more clinically realistic experiment in which a glenoid component was implanted into a porcine scapula was carried out and the DVC-μCT measurements during a single load cycle (duration 20 min due to scanning time) was correlated with the manual tracking of micromotion at 12 discrete points across the implant interface. In this same experiment the full-field DVC-μCT micromotion was compared to the full-field micromotion predicted by a parallel finite element analysis (FEA). It was found that DVC-μCT micromotion matched the known micromotion of the simplified experiment (average/peak error=1.4/1.7 μm, regression line slope=0.999) and correlated with the micromotion at the 12 points tracked manually during the realistic experiment (R(2)=0.96). The DVC-μCT full-field micromotion matched the pattern of the full-field FEA predicted micromotion. This study showed that the DVC-μCT technique provides sensible estimates of micromotion. The main advantages of this technique are that it does not damage important parts of the specimen to gain access to the bone-implant interface, and it provides a full-field evaluation of micromotion as opposed to the micromotion at just a few discrete points. In conclusion the DVC-μCT technique provides a useful tool for investigations of micromotion around plastic implants.

[1]  Y. Yoon,et al.  In vitro measurement of interface micromotion and crack in cemented total hip arthroplasty systems with different surface roughness. , 2010, Clinical biomechanics.

[2]  L. Pruitt Deformation, yielding, fracture and fatigue behavior of conventional and highly cross-linked ultra high molecular weight polyethylene. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[3]  M. Galetz,et al.  Potential for adhesive wear in friction couples of UHMWPE running against oxidized zirconium, titanium nitride coatings, and cobalt-chromium alloys. , 2010, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[4]  L. Nolte,et al.  Three-dimensional measurement of cemented femoral stem stability: an in vitro cadaver study. , 2000, Clinical Biomechanics.

[5]  W. Hayes,et al.  Prediction of vertebral body compressive fracture using quantitative computed tomography. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  F. Hild,et al.  Computation of full-field displacements in a scaffold implant using digital volume correlation and finite element analysis. , 2013, Medical engineering & physics.

[7]  I. Sinclair,et al.  The application of digital volume correlation (DVC) to study the microstructural behaviour of trabecular bone during compression. , 2014, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[8]  W. Harris,et al.  Differences in stiffness of the interface between a cementless porous implant and cancellous bone in vivo in dogs due to varying amounts of implant motion. , 1996, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[9]  A. Amis,et al.  The effects of glenoid component alignment variations on cement mantle stresses in total shoulder arthroplasty. , 2004, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[10]  D. W. Bühler,et al.  Design and evaluation of a device for measuring three-dimensional micromotions of press-fit femoral stem prostheses. , 1997, Medical engineering & physics.

[11]  L. D. De Wilde,et al.  A glenoid reaming study: how accurate are current reaming techniques? , 2014, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[12]  Egon Perilli,et al.  Application of the digital volume correlation technique for the measurement of displacement and strain fields in bone: a literature review. , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  I. Jandejsek,et al.  Precise strain measurement in complex materials using Digital Volumetric Correlation and time lapse micro-CT data , 2011 .

[14]  J. Parvizi,et al.  Biology of implant osseointegration. , 2009, Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions.

[15]  B. Bay,et al.  Digital volume correlation: Three-dimensional strain mapping using X-ray tomography , 1999 .

[16]  M. Klotz,et al.  The stability of the femoral component in the Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: a comparison of single and twin peg designs. , 2014, The bone & joint journal.

[17]  Angelo Cappello,et al.  Comparative in vitro study on the long term performance of cemented hip stems: validation of a protocol to discriminate between "good" and "bad" designs. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  A. Amis,et al.  The influence of tibial component fixation techniques on resorption of supporting bone stock after total knee replacement. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  D. Pichora,et al.  Glenoid cancellous bone strength and modulus. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  A. Farron,et al.  Effect of supraspinatus deficiency on humerus translation and glenohumeral contact force during abduction. , 2007, Clinical biomechanics.

[21]  E. Valstar,et al.  Interface micromotions increase with less-conforming cementless glenoid components. , 2012, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[22]  L. Geris,et al.  The influence of micro-motion on the tissue differentiation around immediately loaded cylindrical turned titanium implants. , 2006, Archives of oral biology.

[23]  S. Cowin,et al.  On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  A. Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Experimental determination of friction characteristics at the trabecular bone/porous-coated metal interface in cementless implants. , 1993, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[25]  A. Amis,et al.  Analysis of bone-prosthesis interface micromotion for cementless tibial prosthesis fixation and the influence of loading conditions. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  A. Amis,et al.  Finite element modelling of primary hip stem stability: the effect of interference fit. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  D. Burr,et al.  Stiffness of compact bone: effects of porosity and density. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  L. Geris,et al.  The effect of micro-motion on the tissue response around immediately loaded roughened titanium implants in the rabbit. , 2007, European journal of oral sciences.

[29]  Alexandre Terrier,et al.  A new technique to measure micromotion distribution around a cementless femoral stem. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  W. Harris,et al.  In Vivo Skeletal Responses to Porous-Surfaced Implants Subjected to Small Induced Motions* , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[31]  S. Szmukler‐Moncler,et al.  Timing of loading and effect of micromotion on bone-dental implant interface: review of experimental literature. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[32]  J. Lynch,et al.  Glenoid component failure in total shoulder arthroplasty. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[33]  J. A. Currey,et al.  Effect of mechanical stimuli on skeletal regeneration around implants. , 2007, Bone.

[34]  J. Hutchinson,et al.  Some basic relationships between density values in cancellous and cortical bone. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[35]  S. G. Clarke,et al.  Validation of FE Micromotions and Strains Around a Press-Fit Cup: Introducing a New Micromotion Measuring Technique , 2012, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.