Research Articles about Open Access Indexed by Scopus: A Content Analysis

This study analyzes research articles about open access (OA) indexed by the Scopus database, published from 2001 to 2015, in order to: (a) propose a categorization scheme about OA; (b) categorize the scientific production about OA; and (c) identify research trends on OA through disciplines at international level over time. The authors used descriptive statistical methods and deductive content analysis using an unconstrained matrix in 347 selected research articles. The most explored themes were found to be “overview, current state, and growth of OA” counting for 98 articles (28.2%), and “awareness, perceptions, and attitudes toward OA” for 75 articles (21.6%). As a conclusion, this study reveals a continuous and growing research interest by the OA community in studies focused on case studies regarding the development or evolution of OA in relation to certain groups, institutions, regions, periods, and how different actors perceive and address the OA movement.

[1]  Svenja Bedenlier,et al.  The battle for open: how openness won and why it doesn’t feel like victory , 2015 .

[2]  S. Haustein,et al.  The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era , 2015, PloS one.

[3]  K. Rosengren.  Advances in Content Analysis , 1981 .

[4]  Mark J. McCabe,et al.  The Impact of Publisher Mergers on Journal Prices , 2001 .

[5]  Stephen Cavanagh Rgn,et al.  Content analysis: concepts, methods and applications. , 1997, Nurse researcher.

[6]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[7]  B Downe-Wamboldt,et al.  Content analysis: method, applications, and issues. , 1992, Health care for women international.

[8]  J. Pieterse.  International Encyclopedia of Communication , 2008 .

[9]  Helvi Kyngäs,et al.  The qualitative content analysis process. , 2008, Journal of advanced nursing.

[10]  Susan Hornby,et al.  Statistical Methods for the Information Professional: A Practical, Painless Approach to Understanding, Using, and Interpreting Statistics , 2002, J. Documentation.

[11]  Steven E. Stemler,et al.  An Overview of Content Analysis. , 2001 .

[12]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Towards Electronic Journals: Realities for Scientists, Librarians, and Publishers,,,, , 2000 .

[13]  Donald W. King,et al.  A importancia dos periodicos para o trabalho cientifico , 2009 .

[14]  L. Elton,et al.  Public Knowledge—The Social Dimension of Science , 1968 .

[15]  Glenn S. McGuigan,et al.  The Business of Academic Publishing: A Strategic Analysis of the Academic Journal Publishing Industr , 2008 .

[16]  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh,et al.  Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[17]  Aspasia Togia,et al.  Attitudes towards open access: a meta-synthesis of the empirical literature , 2014, ELPUB.

[18]  John Mackenzie Owen,et al.  The Scientific Article in the Age of Digitization , 2006, Information Science and Knowledge Management.

[19]  Jamshid Beheshti,et al.  A bibliometric study of scholarly articles published by library and information science authors about open access , 2014, Inf. Res..

[20]  Norman Kaplan,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1974 .

[21]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[22]  James H. Walther.  Towards Electronic Journals: Realities for Scientists, Librarians and Publishers , 2001 .

[23]  Richard K. Johnson.  Open Access , 2005 .

[24]  Ronald R. Powell,et al.  Basic Research Methods for Librarians , 1985 .

[25]  Bailey,et al.  Open Access Bibliography: Liberating Scholarly Literature with E-Prints and Open Access Journals , 2005 .

[26]  R. Weber.  Basic Content Analysis , 1986 .

[27]  Colin Seymour-Ure,et al.  Content Analysis in Communication Research. , 1972 .

[28]  Ruth A. Palmquist.  Statistical Methods for the Information Professional: A Practical, Painless Approach to Understanding, Using, and Interpreting Statistics , 2002 .

[29]  Shengnan Wu,et al.  Study on themes and authors’ influence of open access in China , 2014, Scientometrics.

[30]  Charles W. Bailey,et al.  Transforming Scholarly Publishing through Open Access: A Bibliography , 2010 .

[31]  Annemaree Lloyd,et al.  The provision and sharing of information between service providers and settling refugees , 2014, Inf. Res..

[32]  A. J. Meadows,et al.  Communicating research , 1997, Library and information science series.

[33]  David Stuart,et al.  Open Access and the Humanities: Contexts, Controversies and the Future , 2015, Online Inf. Rev..

[34]  J. Ravetz.  The force of knowledge. The scientific dimension of society , 1977, Medical History.

[35]  Ely Francina Tannuri de Oliveira,et al.  Scientific Production on Open Access: A Worldwide Bibliometric Analysis in the Academic and Scientific Context , 2016, Publ..

[36]  N. Fjällbrant.  Scholarly Communication - Historical Development and New Possibilities , 2012 .

[37]  Mikael Laakso.  Measuring Open Access: Studies of Web-enabled Innovation in Scientific Journal Publishing , 2014 .

[38]  Linda Shields,et al.  Content Analysis , 2015 .

[39]  R. Merton,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1975, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion.