Gain effects on performance using a head-controlled computer input device.

The purpose of this study was to use a Fitts' task to (1) determine how control-display gain influences performance using a head-controlled computer input device; (2) compare relative sensitivity to gain and optimal gain between head control and hand/arm control; and (3) investigate control-display gain interactions with other task factors including target width, movement amplitude and direction. The task was a discrete target acquisition task using circular targets of 2.9 mm, 8.1 mm, and 23.5 mm, movement amplitudes of 24.3 mm and 61.7 mm, and eight radial directions including 0 degrees, 45 degrees, 90 degrees, 135 degrees, 180 degrees, 225 degrees, 270 degrees, and 315 degrees. Each device was operated at four gain levels. Ten subjects participated. The results indicated that gain had a significant effect on movement time for both types of pointing devices and exhibited local minimums. Discrete target acquisition at all gains was aptly described using Fitts' Law for both input devices. The mouse gain resulting in minimum movement time and RMS cursor deviation was between 1.0 and 2.0. The minimum movement time and RMS cursor deviation for the head-controlled pointer occurred at a gain between 0.3 and 0.6. Average movement time at the optimal head-controlled pointer gain had a slope of 169 ms/bit and was more than 76% greater than at the optimal mouse gain with a slope of 135 ms/bit. In addition, average RMS displacement was more than 27% greater for the head-controlled pointer at its optimal gain setting than for the mouse. Gain had the greatest effect for small target widths and long movement amplitudes using the head-controlled pointer. Average movement time increased 37% when increasing the head-controlled pointer gain from 0.6 to 1.2 for the small target width, but only increased 0.3% when increasing gain for the large target width. Average movement time also increased 12% when decreasing the head-controlled pointer gain from 0.3 to 0.15 for the long movement amplitude, but decreased 0.3% when decreasing gain for the short movement amplitude.

[1]  P D Neilson,et al.  Motor control deficits of orofacial muscles in cerebral palsy. , 1988, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[2]  Joel S. Greenstein,et al.  Optimizing the Touch Tablet: The Effects of Control-Display Gain and Method of Cursor Control , 1986 .

[3]  D. Chaffin,et al.  An investigation of fitts' law using a wide range of movement amplitudes. , 1976, Journal of motor behavior.

[4]  Joel S. Greenstein,et al.  An Evaluation of Display/Control Gain , 1987 .

[5]  R. Andres,et al.  Prediction of Head Movement Time Using Fitts’ Law , 1989 .

[6]  Robert H. McKim,et al.  Human engineering guide to equipment design , 1963 .

[7]  Jesse Orlansky,et al.  DESIGN OF CONTROLS , 1956 .

[8]  C. B. Gibbs,et al.  Controller design Interactions of controlling limbs, time-lags and gains in positional and velocity systems , 1962 .

[9]  Brian Shackel,et al.  Applied ergonomics handbook , 1984 .

[10]  P. Fitts.  The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  Martin R. Sheridan,et al.  A reappraisal of fitts' law. , 1979, Journal of motor behavior.

[12]  Gary D. Langolf,et al.  Human Performance Times in Microscope Work , 1975 .

[13]  E. R. Crossman,et al.  Feedback Control of Hand-Movement and Fitts' Law , 1983, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[14]  M L Lin,et al.  A Method for Evaluating Head-Controlled Computer Input Devices Using Fitts' Law , 1990, Human factors.

[15]  W. L. Jenkins,et al.  Some design factors in making settings on a linear scale. , 1949 .

[16]  Stuart K. Card,et al.  Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys, and text keys, for text selection on a CRT , 1987 .

[17]  R J Jagacinski,et al.  Fitts' Law in two dimensions with hand and head movements. , 1983, Journal of motor behavior.

[18]  P D Neilson,et al.  Self-regulation of spasm and spasticity in cerebral palsy. , 1982, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[19]  Brian W. Epps.  Comparison of Six Cursor Control Devices Based on Fitts' Law Models , 1986 .

[20]  A. T. Welford,et al.  The fundamentals of skill , 1968 .

[21]  William Clouser Boyd,et al.  Fundamentals of Immunology , 1958 .

[22]  Leslie Buck,et al.  Motor performance in relation to control-display gain and target width , 1980 .

[23]  B. Kantowitz,et al.  Fitts' law with an isometric controller: effects of order of control and control-display gain. , 1988, Journal of motor behavior.

[24]  E. C. Poulton,et al.  Tracking skill and manual control , 1974 .

[25]  J. Voelcker,et al.  Of mice and menus: designing the user-friendly interface , 1989, IEEE Spectrum.

[26]  P. Fitts,et al.  INFORMATION CAPACITY OF DISCRETE MOTOR RESPONSES. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[27]  E. Hoffmann,et al.  Geometrical conditions for ballistic and visually controlled movements. , 1988, Ergonomics.

[28]  Robert Sessions Woodworth,et al.  THE ACCURACY OF VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT , 1899 .