Acoustic feature extraction by cross-correlation in crickets?

Common concepts of acoustic feature extraction within the auditory pathway of vertebrates and insects assume temporal filters tuned to particular periodicities. Crickets respond selectively to the conspecific song pattern and reveal a bandpass characteristic, which is thought to arise from a matched filter for a restricted range of periods. Unexpectedly, females of the two sibling species Teleogryllus oceanicus and T. commodus differed in fundamental filter properties. While T. oceanicus revealed a period filter, T. commodus exhibited a pulse duration filter. This finding raises the question of how so distinct properties of homologous neuronal circuits for pattern analysis have evolved during speciation. Evidence is presented that signal analysis by cross-correlation offers a simple explanation for differences in pattern selectivity as well as for the evolutionary transition. By cross-correlation the similarity of an external pattern with an internal template is determined over a certain time window. A comparison of behavioural data and cross-correlation values suggested that both species have similar templates. However, time windows were significantly different between species (T. oceanicus: 180–400 ms, T. commodus: 90–160 ms). Consequently, solely a change in the evaluation time window is required to account for the observed differences in feature extraction that serve to maintain species isolation.

[1]  G. Pollack Sensory cues for sound localization in the cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus: interaural difference in response strength versus interaural latency difference , 2003, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[2]  Gerald Langner,et al.  Periodicity coding in the auditory system , 1992, Hearing Research.

[3]  O. V. Helversen,et al.  Song pattern recognition and an auditory time window in the female bushcricket Ancistrura nigrovittata (Orthoptera: Phaneropteridae) , 1994, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[4]  B. Ronacher,et al.  Effects of signal duration on the recognition of masked communication signals by the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus , 2000, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[5]  P. Marler Three models of song learning: evidence from behavior. , 1997, Journal of neurobiology.

[6]  Cynthia F. Moss,et al.  Convergence of temporal and spectral information into acoustic images of complex sonar targets perceived by the echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus , 1990, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[7]  G. Laurent,et al.  Temporal Representations of Odors in an Olfactory Network , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  John A. Doherty,et al.  Trade-off phenomena in calling song recognition and phonotaxis in the cricket,Gryllus bimaculatus (Orthoptera, Gryllidae) , 1985, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[9]  J. D. Crawford,et al.  Feature-detecting auditory neurons in the brain of a sound-producing fish , 1997, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[10]  Axel Michelsen,et al.  Auditory Processing of Temporal Cues in Insect Songs: Frequency Domain or Time Domain? , 1985 .

[11]  T. Houtgast Frequency selectivity in amplitude-modulation detection. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  G. Pollack,et al.  Who, what, where? recognition and localization of acoustic signals by insects , 2000, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[13]  G. Rose A temporal-processing mechanism for all species? , 1986, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[14]  Dagmar von Helversen,et al.  Acoustic pattern recognition in a grasshopper: processing in the time or frequency domain? , 1998, Biological Cybernetics.

[15]  Franz Huber,et al.  Auditory behavior of the cricket , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[16]  K. Schildberger,et al.  Temporal selectivity of identified auditory neurons in the cricket brain , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[17]  Jack W. Bradbury,et al.  Principles of Animal Communication , 1998 .

[18]  Gary J. Rose,et al.  Long-term temporal integration in the anuran auditory system , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  G. Pollack,et al.  Temporal Pattern as a Cue for Species-Specific Calling Song Recognition in Crickets , 1979, Science.

[20]  E. de Boer,et al.  Auditory Time Constants: A Paradox? , 1985 .

[21]  R R Hoy,et al.  Hybrid cricket auditory behavior: evidence for genetic coupling in animal communication. , 1977, Science.

[22]  M. Konishi,et al.  A circuit for detection of interaural time differences in the brain stem of the barn owl , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[23]  D. Helversen,et al.  Acoustic communication in phaneropterid bushcrickets: species-specific delay of female stridulatory response and matching male sensory time window , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[24]  G. Rose,et al.  Processing amplitude-modulated sounds by the auditory midbrain of two species of toads: matched temporal filters , 1984, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[25]  Gerald S. Pollack,et al.  Calling song recognition in the cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus: comparison of the effects of stimulus intensity and sound spectrum on selectivity for temporal pattern , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[26]  T. Dau,et al.  Spectro-temporal processing in the envelope-frequency domain. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  J. Schul,et al.  Song recognition by temporal cues in a group of closely related bushcricket species (genus Tettigonia) , 1998, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[28]  Y. Yarom,et al.  Resonance, oscillation and the intrinsic frequency preferences of neurons , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[29]  D. Blumstein Acoustic Communication in Insects and Anurans : Common Problems and Diverse Solutions , 2002 .

[30]  D. von Helversen,et al.  Acoustic pattern recognition and orientation in orthopteran insects: parallel or serial processing? , 1995, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[31]  R R Hoy,et al.  Genetic control of the neuronal network generating cricket (Teleogryllus Gryllus) song patterns. , 1972, Animal behaviour.

[32]  R M Hennig,et al.  Auditory perception: How cicadas interpret acoustic signals , 2000, Nature.

[33]  R. R. Capranica,et al.  Temporal selectivity in the central auditory system of the leopard frog. , 1983, Science.

[34]  J. Eggermont The Correlative Brain: Theory and Experiment in Neural Interaction , 1990 .

[35]  Hans Scharstein,et al.  Cricket phonotaxis: localization depends on recognition of the calling song pattern , 1989, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[36]  R. M. Hennig,et al.  Filtering of temporal parameters of the calling song by cricket females of two closely related species: a behavioral analysis , 1997, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.