Statistical Wavelet-Based Method for Structural Health Monitoring

A statistical pattern classification method based on wavelet packet transform (WPT) is developed in this study for structural health monitoring. The core of this method is the WPT with the ability of extracting minute abnormality from vibration signals. The vibration signals of a structure excited by a pulse load are first decomposed into wavelet packet components. Signal energies of these wavelet packet components are then calculated and sorted according to their magnitudes. Those components that are small in signal energy are discarded since they are easily contaminated by measurement noise. The remaining dominant component energies are defined as a novel condition index, the wavelet packet signature (WPS). Two damage indicators are then formulated to lump the discriminate information from the extracted WPS. Thresholds for damage alarming are established using the statistical properties and the 1-sided confidence limit of the damage indicators from successive measurements. To demonstrate, an experimental study on the health monitoring of a steel cantilever I beam is performed. Four damage cases involving line cuts of different severities in the flanges at 1 cross section are introduced. Vibration signals are obtained from an accelerometer installed at the free end of the beam. Results show that the health condition of the beam can be accurately monitored by the proposed method even when the signals are highly contaminated with noise. The proposed method does not require any prior knowledge of the structure being monitored and is suitable for on-line continuous monitoring of structural health condition.

[1]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Quality Control , 1986 .

[2]  Mohammad Noori,et al.  Wavelet-Based Approach for Structural Damage Detection , 2000 .

[3]  Ruxu Du,et al.  FEATURE EXTRACTION AND ASSESSMENT USING WAVELET PACKETS FOR MONITORING OF MACHINING PROCESSES , 1996 .

[4]  Pc Pandey,et al.  Vibration signature analysis using artificial neural networks , 1995 .

[5]  Stuart S. Chen,et al.  Automated Signal Monitoring Using Neural Networks in a Smart Structural System , 1995 .

[6]  Inderjit Chopra,et al.  Helicopter Rotor System Fault Detection Using Physics-Based Model and Neural Networks , 1998 .

[7]  R. B. Testa,et al.  Modal Analysis for Damage Detection in Structures , 1991 .

[8]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring Using Statistical Process Control , 2000 .

[9]  Ronald R. Coifman,et al.  Entropy-based algorithms for best basis selection , 1992, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[10]  Mark M. Derriso,et al.  Structural integrity monitoring of composite patch repairs using wavelet analysis and neural networks , 2002, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[11]  Angel C. Aparicio,et al.  Structural Damage Identification from Dynamic‐Test Data , 1994 .

[12]  A. K. Pandey,et al.  Modified Chain-code Computer Vision Techniques For Interrogation Of Vibration Signatures For Structural Fault Detection , 1994 .

[13]  Chih-Chen Chang,et al.  Structural Damage Assessment Based on Wavelet Packet Transform , 2002 .

[14]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods , 1998 .

[15]  H L Chen,et al.  Evaluating Structural Deterioration by Dynamic Response , 1995 .

[16]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Comparative study of damage identification algorithms applied to a bridge: I. Experiment , 1998 .

[17]  John T. DeWolf,et al.  Experimental Study of Bridge Monitoring Technique , 1990 .

[18]  K. Park,et al.  Use of Substructural Transmission Zeros for Structural Health Monitoring , 2000 .