An Exploratory Study of the Relationship Between Socioeconomic Status and Motor Vehicle Safety Features

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the association between motor vehicle owners' socioeconomic status (SES) and the safety of their motor vehicles. Methods: Truncated vehicle identification numbers (VINs) were obtained from the Maryland Motor Vehicle Administration office. ZIP code–level income and educational data were assigned to each VIN. Software was used to identify safety-related vehicle characteristics including crash test rating, availability of electronic stability control and side impact air bags, age, and weight. Correlations and analyses of variance were performed to assess whether a ZIP code's median household income and educational level were associated with its proportion of registered vehicles with safety features. Results: For 13 of the 16 correlations performed, SES was significantly associated with the availability of vehicle safety features in a direction that favored upper-income individuals. Vehicle weight was not associated with income or education. When ZIP codes were divided into median household income quintiles, their mean proportions of safety features also differed significantly, in the same direction, for availability of electronic stability control, side impact air bags, vehicle age, and crash test ratings. Conclusions: Safer motor vehicles appear to be distributed along socioeconomic lines, with lower income groups experiencing more risk. This previously unidentified mechanism of disparity merits further study and the attention of policy makers.

[1]  D. Grossman,et al.  The new car assessment program: does it predict the relative safety of vehicles in actual crashes? , 2004, Journal of Trauma.

[2]  Anne T. McCartt,et al.  Efficacy of Side Airbags in Reducing Driver Deaths in Driver-Side Car and SUV Collisions , 2007, Traffic injury prevention.

[3]  Charles M Farmer,et al.  Trends Over Time in the Risk of Driver Death: What If Vehicle Designs Had Not Improved? , 2006, Traffic injury prevention.

[4]  Charles M Farmer,et al.  Relationships of Frontal Offset Crash Test Results to Real-World Driver Fatality Rates , 2005, Traffic injury prevention.

[5]  Susan A Ferguson,et al.  The Effectiveness of Electronic Stability Control in Reducing Real-World Crashes: A Literature Review , 2007, Traffic injury prevention.

[6]  Elisa R Braver,et al.  Race, Hispanic origin, and socioeconomic status in relation to motor vehicle occupant death rates and risk factors among adults. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  C J Kahane,et al.  LIVES SAVED BY THE FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARDS AND OTHER VEHICLE SAFETY TECHNOLOGIES, 1960-2002 - PASSENGER CARS AND LIGHT TRUCKS - WITH A REVIEW OF 19 FMVSS AND THEIR EFFECTIVENESS IN REDUCING FATALITIES, INJURIES AND CRASHES , 2004 .

[8]  S Ameratunga,et al.  Vehicle year and the risk of car crash injury , 2003, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[9]  Motor-vehicle safety: a 20th century public health achievement. , 1999, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[10]  Anne T McCartt,et al.  Choice of teenagers' vehicles and views on vehicle safety: survey of parents of novice teenage drivers. , 2007, Journal of safety research.

[11]  Ten great public health achievements--United States, 1900-1999. , 1999, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[12]  Charles M. Farmer,et al.  Effects of Electronic Stability Control: An Update , 2006, Traffic injury prevention.

[13]  C Power,et al.  Does the decline in child injury mortality vary by social class? A comparison of class specific mortality in 1981 and 1991 , 1996, BMJ.

[14]  Leon S Robertson.  Prevention of motor-vehicle deaths by changing vehicle factors , 2007, Injury Prevention.

[15]  S Lu,et al.  Vehicle Survivability and Travel Mileage Schedules , 2006 .

[16]  M Pledger,et al.  Motor vehicle driver injury and socioeconomic status: a cohort study with prospective and retrospective driver injuries , 2003, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[17]  Gordon S. Smith,et al.  Socioeconomic inequalities in injury: critical issues in design and analysis. , 2002, Annual review of public health.

[18]  Lynn E Eberly,et al.  ZIP-code-based versus tract-based income measures as long-term risk-adjusted mortality predictors. , 2006, American journal of epidemiology.

[19]  Jarvis T. Chen,et al.  Geocoding and monitoring of US socioeconomic inequalities in mortality and cancer incidence: does the choice of area-based measure and geographic level matter?: the Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project. , 2002, American journal of epidemiology.