Validation of the DINAMAP ProCare blood pressure device according to the international protocol in an adult population

ObjectiveInaccurate blood pressure measurement has serious implications for both the patient and the health service. It results in inappropriate treatment and underestimation of clinical risk. Few automated devices have been shown to be accurate when compared with mercury sphygmomanometery. The DINAMAP ProCare has been developed to be accurate compared with an auscultatory standard. We used the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension to assess the accuracy of this device in an adult population. MethodsThirty-eight participants were recruited from outpatient clinics and staff at Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, RSA. Of these, 33 participants who fulfilled the requirements of the International Protocol were selected for final analysis. Demographic data were obtained from each participant, followed by nine sequential same-arm measurements, alternating between two trained observers and the device. The last seven readings were analysed according to the guidelines of the International Protocol. ResultsThe ProCare Monitor achieved all the required criteria of the International Protocol by successfully passing phase 1, phase 2.1 and phase 2.2 of the study protocol. The mean difference (standard deviation) for systolic and diastolic pressures, respectively, were –2.5 (5.4) and 0.5 (4.5) mmHg, which also falls within the passing criteria for the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation Standard (ANSI/AAMI SP-10). ConclusionThe DINAMAP ProCare Monitor can be recommended for clinical use in an adult population.

[1]  A. Murray,et al.  Automated non-invasive blood pressure devices: are they suitable for use? , 2005, Blood pressure monitoring.

[2]  M. J. Turner,et al.  Effects of systematic errors in blood pressure measurements on the diagnosis of hypertension , 2004, Blood pressure monitoring.

[3]  E. O’Brien A website for blood pressure measuring devices: dableducational.com. , 2003, Blood pressure monitoring.

[4]  A. D. Stebor,et al.  Determination of accuracy in neonates for non-invasive blood pressure device using an improved algorithm , 2002, Blood pressure monitoring.

[5]  Yutaka Imai,et al.  Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring of the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol for validation of blood pressure measuring devices in adults , 2002, Blood pressure monitoring.

[6]  E. O’Brien,et al.  State of the market in 2001 for blood pressure measuring devices. , 2001, Blood pressure monitoring.

[7]  O'brien,et al.  Accuracy of the Dinamap Portable Monitor, model 8100: a review of the evidence for accuracy. , 1997, Blood pressure monitoring.

[8]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[9]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[10]  PhD Maynard Ramsey III MD,et al.  Blood pressure monitoring: Automated oscillometric devices , 2005, Journal of Clinical Monitoring.

[11]  F. Mee,et al.  Evaluation of blood pressure measuring devices. , 1993, Clinical and experimental hypertension.