Feedback interventions for college alcohol misuse: what, why and for whom?

In response to the persistent problem of college drinking, universities have instituted a range of alcohol intervention programs for students. Motivational feedback is one intervention that has garnered support in the literature and been adopted on college campuses. This article reviews published outcome studies that have utilized feedback as a major component of an alcohol intervention for college students. Overall, 11 of the 13 reviewed studies (77%) found a significant reduction in drinking as compared to a control or comparison group. While the studies varied widely in terms of population, follow-up period, and feedback content, it appears that feedback can be effective whether delivered by mail, the Internet, or via a face-to-face motivational interview. Feedback seems to change normative perceptions of drinking and may be more effective among students who drink for social reasons. The addition of a group or individual counseling session does not appear to increase the short-term impact of the feedback.

[1]  S. Walters.  In Praise of Feedback: An Effective Intervention for College Students Who Are Heavy Drinkers , 2000, Journal of American college health : J of ACH.

[2]  M. Larimer,et al.  Biases in the perception of drinking norms among college students. , 1991, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[3]  Robert B. Cialdini,et al.  The transsituational influence of social norms. , 1993 .

[4]  H. Perkins,et al.  Problem drinking among college students: a review of recent research. , 1986, Journal of American college health : J of ACH.

[5]  L. Festinger.  A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[6]  K. Carey,et al.  Effects of a brief motivational intervention with college student drinkers. , 2000, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[7]  F. Grodstein,et al.  Continuation and initiation of alcohol use from the first to the second year of college. , 1994, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[8]  A P Turner,et al.  Evaluating a brief alcohol intervention with fraternities. , 2001, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[9]  Clayton Neighbors,et al.  Gender-specific misperceptions of college student drinking norms. , 2004, Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors.

[10]  N. Barnett.  Book Review: Brief Alcohol Screening and Intervention for College Students (BASICS), by Linda A. Dimeff, John S. Baer, Daniel R. Kivlahan, and G. Alan Marlatt , 2000 .

[11]  Deborah A. Prentice,et al.  Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  M. Copass,et al.  Alcohol interventions in a trauma center as a means of reducing the risk of injury recurrence. , 1999, Annals of surgery.

[13]  John Strang,et al.  The efficacy of single-session motivational interviewing in reducing drug consumption and perceptions of drug-related risk and harm among young people: results from a multi-site cluster randomized trial. , 2004, Addiction.

[14]  B. Latané.  The psychology of social impact. , 1981 .

[15]  M. Schuckit,et al.  Increases in alcohol-related problems for men on a college campus between 1980 and 1992. , 1994, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[16]  H. Wechsler,et al.  Trends in College Binge Drinking During a Period of Increased Prevention Efforts: Findings from 4 Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study Surveys: 1993–2001 , 2002, Journal of American college health : J of ACH.

[17]  S. Walters,et al.  Mailed Feedback Reduces Consumption Among Moderate Drinkers Who Are Employed , 2003, Prevention Science.

[18]  W. Miller,et al.  Motivational interviewing: preparing people for change. , 2002 .

[19]  G. Barnes,et al.  Alcohol misuse among college students and other young adults: findings from a general population study in New York State. , 1992, The International journal of the addictions.

[20]  W. Miller,et al.  Effects of Normative Feedback on Consumption among Heavy Drinking College Students , 1995, Journal of drug education.

[21]  M. Larimer,et al.  Screening and brief intervention for high-risk college student drinkers , 1998 .

[22]  E. Nace.  Handbook of Alcoholism Treatment Approaches: Effective Alternatives , 1990 .

[23]  R. Vuchinich,et al.  Relative efficacy of a brief motivational intervention for college student drinkers. , 2001, Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors.

[24]  J. Graham,et al.  Social influence processes affecting adolescent substance use. , 1991, The Journal of applied psychology.

[25]  M. Larimer,et al.  An experimental test of three methods of alcohol risk reduction with young adults. , 1992, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[26]  R. Hanewinkel,et al.  Brief alcohol screening and intervention for college students (BASICS): A German pilot study , 2005 .

[27]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[28]  K. Carey,et al.  Developing discrepancy within self-regulation theory: use of personalized normative feedback and personal strivings with heavy-drinking college students. , 2004, Addictive behaviors.

[29]  K. Carey,et al.  Peer influences on college drinking: a review of the research. , 2001, Journal of substance abuse.

[30]  E. Chiauzzi,et al.  Demon rum: high-tech solutions to an age-old problem. , 2005, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[31]  W. Miller,et al.  Findings of a pilot study of motivational interviewing with pregnant drinkers. , 1999, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[32]  R. Glasgow,et al.  Telephone counseling for smoking cessation: rationales and meta-analytic review of evidence. , 1996, Health education research.

[33]  Mary E. Larimer,et al.  College drinking and the Greek system: Examining the role of perceived norms for high-risk behavior , 1997 .

[34]  M. Pantalon,et al.  Motivational interviewing and treatment adherence among psychiatric and dually diagnosed patients. , 1999, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[35]  H. Wechsler,et al.  The adverse impact of heavy episodic drinkers on other college students. , 1995, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[36]  R. Vuchinich,et al.  A comparison of personalized feedback for college student drinkers delivered with and without a motivational interview. , 2004, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[37]  G. Dowdall.  A Call to Action: Challenging the Culture of Drinking at US Colleges , 2003 .

[38]  L. Dimeff,et al.  Computer-enhanced primary care practitioner advice for high-risk college drinkers in a student primary health-care setting , 2000 .

[39]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency , 2024, Psihologìâ ì suspìlʹstvo.

[40]  W. Miller,et al.  Client commitment language during motivational interviewing predicts drug use outcomes. , 2003, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[41]  Mary Pat Frintner,et al.  Acquaintance rape: The influence of alcohol, fraternity membership, and sports team membership. , 1993 .

[42]  Scott T. Walters,et al.  Addressing Drinking Among College Students , 2000 .

[43]  M. Larimer,et al.  Identification, prevention and treatment: a review of individual-focused strategies to reduce problematic alcohol consumption by college students. , 2002, Journal of studies on alcohol. Supplement.

[44]  M. Sliwinski,et al.  Mailed personalized normative feedback as a brief intervention for at-risk college drinkers. , 2002, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[45]  M. Thase,et al.  Increasing treatment adherence among outpatients with depression and cocaine dependence: results of a pilot study. , 1998, The American journal of psychiatry.

[46]  Joseph H. Miller,et al.  Reducing Alcohol Use in College Students: A Controlled Trial of Two Brief Interventions , 2000, Journal of drug education.

[47]  Clayton Neighbors,et al.  Targeting misperceptions of descriptive drinking norms: efficacy of a computer-delivered personalized normative feedback intervention. , 2004, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[48]  M. Larimer,et al.  Problem drinking and the workplace: an individualized approach to prevention. , 2002, Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors.

[49]  Patrick M. O'Malley,et al.  Monitoring the Future National Results on Adolescent Drug Use: Overview of Key Findings, 2004. , 2003 .

[50]  T. Palfai,et al.  Social influence processes and college student drinking: the mediational role of alcohol outcome expectancies. , 2001, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[51]  Henry Wechsler,et al.  Magnitude of alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among U.S. college students ages 18-24. , 2002, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[52]  Patrick O'Malley,et al.  Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2018: Volume I, Secondary school students , 2000 .

[53]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[54]  Patrick M. O'Malley,et al.  National Survey Results on Drug Use from the Monitoring the Future Study, 1975-1995. Volume II: College Students and Young Adults. , 1997 .

[55]  L. Sederer.  The Addictive Behaviors , 1984 .

[56]  W. Miller,et al.  Handbook of Alcoholism Treatment Approaches: Effective Alternatives , 1995 .

[57]  S. Worchel,et al.  Psychology of intergroup relations , 1986 .

[58]  M. Larimer,et al.  Treating adolescents together or individually? Issues in adolescent substance abuse interventions. , 2002, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.