Biogeographical patterns of biomass allocation in leaves, stems, and roots in China’s forests

To test whether there are general patterns in biomass partitioning in relation to environmental variation when stand biomass is considered, we investigated biomass allocation in leaves, stems, and roots in China’s forests using both the national forest inventory data (2004–2008) and our field measurements (2011–2012). Distribution patterns of leaf, stem, and root biomass showed significantly different trends according to latitude, longitude, and altitude, and were positively and significantly correlated with stand age and mean annual precipitation. Trade-offs among leaves, stems, and roots varied with forest type and origin and were mainly explained by stand biomass. Based on the constraints of stand biomass, biomass allocation was also influenced by forest type, origin, stand age, stand density, mean annual temperature, precipitation, and maximum temperature in the growing season. Therefore, after stand biomass was accounted for, the residual variation in biomass allocation could be partially explained by stand characteristics and environmental factors, which may aid in quantifying carbon cycling in forest ecosystems and assessing the impacts of climate change on forest carbon dynamics in China.

[1]  Jingyun Fang,et al.  Forest biomass and root-shoot allocation in northeast China , 2008 .

[2]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Global patterns of root turnover for terrestrial ecosystems , 2000 .

[3]  Sean C. Thomas,et al.  The worldwide leaf economics spectrum , 2004, Nature.

[4]  J. Thornley.  A Balanced Quantitative Model for Root: Shoot Ratios in Vegetative Plants , 1972 .

[5]  F. S. Chapin,et al.  The Mineral Nutrition of Wild Plants Revisited: A Re-evaluation of Processes and Patterns , 1999 .

[6]  L. Sack,et al.  Pitfalls and Possibilities in the Analysis of Biomass Allocation Patterns in Plants , 2012, Front. Plant Sci..

[7]  Philippe Ciais,et al.  The carbon balance of terrestrial ecosystems in China , 2009, Nature.

[8]  B. Shipley,et al.  The balanced‐growth hypothesis and the allometry of leaf and root biomass allocation , 2002 .

[9]  A. Prokushkin,et al.  Critical analysis of root : shoot ratios in terrestrial biomes , 2006 .

[10]  L. Hedin.  Global organization of terrestrial plant-nutrient interactions. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  P. Reich,et al.  Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control. , 2012, The New phytologist.

[12]  K. Niklas,et al.  Above- and below-ground biomass relationships across 1534 forested communities. , 2007, Annals of botany.

[13]  G. Evans,et al.  The quantitative analysis of plant growth , 1972 .

[14]  H. Poorter,et al.  Growth and carbon economy of a fast- growing and a slow-growing grass species as dependent on ontogeny , 1992 .

[15]  Dali Guo,et al.  Large‐scale pattern of biomass partitioning across China's grasslands , 2010 .

[16]  Xin Jia,et al.  Stem, branch and leaf biomass-density relationships in forest communities , 2012, Ecological Research.

[17]  Hai Ren,et al.  Productivity as related to diversity and age in planted versus natural forests , 2014 .

[18]  Eileen H. Helmer,et al.  Root biomass allocation in the world's upland forests , 1997, Oecologia.

[19]  劉志強,et al.  Sensitivity of Response to Abscisic Acid Affects the Power of self-thinning in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2005 .

[20]  K. Niklas,et al.  Canonical rules for plant organ biomass partitioning and annual allocation. , 2002, American journal of botany.

[21]  Hai Ren,et al.  Influences of biotic and abiotic factors on the relationship between tree productivity and biomass in China , 2012 .

[22]  J. Coleman,et al.  Interpreting phenotypic variation in plants. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[23]  M. Kirschbaum,et al.  The temperature dependence of soil organic matter decomposition, and the effect of global warming on soil organic C storage , 1995 .

[24]  L. Poorter,et al.  Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): a meta-analysis. , 2009, The New phytologist.

[25]  M. Luoto,et al.  New insights into butterfly–environment relationships using partitioning methods , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  J. Coleman,et al.  Biomass allocation in old‐field annual species grown in elevated CO2 environments: no evidence for optimal partitioning , 2000 .

[27]  G. Goldstein,et al.  Leaf photosynthetic traits scale with hydraulic conductivity and wood density in Panamanian forest canopy trees , 2004, Oecologia.

[28]  F. Pugnaire,et al.  Variability in amount and frequency of water supply affects roots but not growth of arid shrubs , 2009, Plant Ecology.

[29]  H. L. Allen,et al.  Influences of silvicultural manipulations on above- and belowground biomass accumulations and leaf area in young Pinus radiata plantations, at three contrasting sites in Chile , 2013 .

[30]  Yunjian Luo,et al.  Dissecting Variation in Biomass Conversion Factors across China’s Forests: Implications for Biomass and Carbon Accounting , 2014, PloS one.

[31]  D. Tilman.  Plant Strategies and the Dynamics and Structure of Plant Communities. (MPB-26), Volume 26 , 1988 .

[32]  P. D. Körner.  Alpine Plant Life , 1999, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[33]  Karl J Niklas,et al.  Global Allocation Rules for Patterns of Biomass Partitioning in Seed Plants , 2002, Science.

[34]  Jan Kozłowski,et al.  Is West, Brown and Enquist's model of allometric scaling mathematically correct and biologically relevant? , 2004 .

[35]  Jing Liu,et al.  Plant mass–density relationship along a moisture gradient in north‐west China , 2006 .

[36]  L. Finér,et al.  Factors causing variation in fine root biomass in forest ecosystems , 2011 .

[37]  T. Booth,et al.  Root:shoot ratios across China's forests: Forest type and climatic effects , 2012 .

[38]  Gen-xuan Wang,et al.  Effect of sensitivity to abscisic acid on scaling relationships for biomass production rates and body size in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2006, Acta Physiologiae Plantarum.

[39]  A. Eshel,et al.  Root-Shoot Relations: Optimality in Acclimation and Adaptation or the “Emperor’s New Clothes”? , 2002 .

[40]  Plants interactions between Suaeda salsa individuals are mediated by salinity stress , 2007, Acta Physiologiae Plantarum.

[41]  P. Reich,et al.  Temperature drives global patterns in forest biomass distribution in leaves, stems, and roots , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  S. Piao,et al.  Interannual variations of monthly and seasonal normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) in China from 1982 to 1999 , 2003 .

[43]  C. Field,et al.  Allometric growth and allocation in forests: a perspective from FLUXNET. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[44]  Jianguo Wu,et al.  Lack of Evidence for 3/4 Scaling of Metabolism in Terrestrial Plants , 2005 .

[45]  Susan E. Trumbore,et al.  Controls over carbon storage and turnover in high‐latitude soils , 2000, Global change biology.

[46]  Shilong Piao,et al.  Forest biomass carbon stocks in China over the past 2 decades: Estimation based on integrated inventory and satellite data , 2005 .

[47]  Hendrik Poorter,et al.  The role of biomass allocation in the growth response of plants to different levels of light, CO2, nutrients and water: a quantitative review , 2000 .

[48]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  Evaluation of the terrestrial carbon cycle, future plant geography and climate‐carbon cycle feedbacks using five Dynamic Global Vegetation Models (DGVMs) , 2008 .

[49]  Guangsheng Zhou,et al.  Carbon Storage of Forest Vegetation in China and its Relationship with Climatic Factors , 2006 .

[50]  C. Peng,et al.  Changes in Forest Biomass Carbon Storage in China Between 1949 and 1998 , 2001, Science.

[51]  Gen-xuan Wang,et al.  Sensitivity of response to abscisic acid affects the power of self- thinning in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2005 .

[52]  H. Mooney,et al.  Resource Limitation in Plants-An Economic Analogy , 1985 .

[53]  W. Shen,et al.  Near Isometric Biomass Partitioning in Forest Ecosystems of China , 2014, PloS one.

[54]  Karl J. Niklas,et al.  Botanical Scaling. (Book Reviews: Plant Allometry. The Scaling of Form and Process.) , 1994 .

[55]  S. Bray,et al.  Patterns of Below- and Aboveground Biomass in Eucalyptus populnea Woodland Communities of Northeast Australia along a Rainfall Gradient , 2006, Ecosystems.

[56]  Jianguo Wu,et al.  Variant Scaling Relationship for Mass-Density Across Tree-Dominated Communities , 2006 .

[57]  P. Reich,et al.  Biogeography and variability of eleven mineral elements in plant leaves across gradients of climate, soil and plant functional type in China. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[58]  P. Reich.  Root–Shoot Relations: Optimality in Acclimation and Adaptation or the ‘‘Emperor’s New Clothes’’? , 2002 .

[59]  Mark Westoby,et al.  EVOLUTIONARY DIVERGENCES IN LEAF STRUCTURE AND CHEMISTRY, COMPARING RAINFALL AND SOIL NUTRIENT GRADIENTS , 1999 .

[60]  Y. Yue,et al.  Biomass and carbon storage in an age-sequence of Cyclobalanopsis glauca plantations in southwest China , 2014 .

[61]  Brian J. Enquist,et al.  Consistency between an allometric approach and optimal partitioning theory in global patterns of plant biomass allocation , 2007 .