Chemistry Based Nonanimal Predictive Modeling for Skin Sensitization

Skin sensitization is a significant environmental and occupational health concern. The possibility of workers and consumers becoming sensitized is a major problem for individuals, employers and marketing certain products. Consequently, there exists an important need to accurately identify chemicals that have the potential to cause skin sensitization. Under Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), the sensitizing potential needs to be assessed for substances manufactured or imported at levels of 1 ton or greater per annum. Assessment of skin sensitization has traditionally relied on animal testing, but there are now strong pressures to reduce and ultimately eliminate the use of animals for this purpose. Building on research dating back at least 7 decades, a quite detailed mechanistic understanding of skin sensitization, both in terms of the underlying biological processes and the underlying chemistry, has been developed, with significant advances being made in the present century. This chapter presents an overview of the current biological and chemical mechanistic understanding, and reviews recent progress in nonanimal predictive modeling for skin sensitization, with an emphasis on how the understanding of these mechanisms can be applied in combination with in chemico and in silico approaches to hazard and risk assessment.

[1]  I Kimber,et al.  Vehicle effects on skin sensitizing potency of four chemicals: assessment using the local lymph node assay , 2001, International journal of cosmetic science.

[2]  C L Galli,et al.  Epidermal cytokines in experimental contact dermatitis. , 2000, Toxicology.

[3]  G. Patlewicz,et al.  Structure–activity relationships for selected fragrance allergens , 2002, Contact dermatitis.

[4]  Grace Patlewicz,et al.  Chemical reactivity indices and mechanism‐based read‐across for non‐animal based assessment of skin sensitisation potential , 2008, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[5]  G Frank Gerberick,et al.  Quantification of chemical peptide reactivity for screening contact allergens: a classification tree model approach. , 2007, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[6]  G. Klopman Artificial intelligence approach to structure-activity studies. Computer automated structure evaluation of biological activity of organic molecules , 1985 .

[7]  D. Roberts,et al.  The value of the local lymph node assay in quantitative structure‐activity investigations , 1992, Contact dermatitis.

[8]  G Frank Gerberick,et al.  Interactions of contact allergens with dendritic cells: opportunities and challenges for the development of novel approaches to hazard assessment. , 2005, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[9]  D W Roberts,et al.  The derivation of quantitative correlations between skin sensitisation and physio-chemical parameters for alkylating agents, and their application to experimental data for sultones. , 1982, Journal of theoretical biology.

[10]  I Kimber,et al.  Dendritic cells and cutaneous immune responses to chemical allergens. , 1992, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[11]  D. Sanderson,et al.  Computer Prediction of Possible Toxic Action from Chemical Structure; The DEREK System , 1991, Human & experimental toxicology.

[12]  Philip S. Magee Exploring the Potential for Allergic Contact Dermatitisvia Computed Heats of Reaction of Haptens with Protein End-groups Heats of Reaction of Haptens with Protein End-groups by Computation , 2000 .

[13]  D W Roberts,et al.  Quantitative structure‐activity relationships: sulfonate esters in the local lymph node assay , 2000, Contact dermatitis.

[14]  D W Roberts,et al.  Linear free energy relationships for reactions of electrophilic halo- and pseudohalobenzenes, and their application in prediction of skin sensitization potential for SNAr electrophiles. , 1995, Chemical research in toxicology.

[15]  Yi Li,et al.  4D-fingerprint categorical QSAR models for skin sensitization based on the classification of local lymph node assay measures. , 2007, Chemical research in toxicology.

[16]  Petra S Kern,et al.  TIMES-SS--a promising tool for the assessment of skin sensitization hazard. A characterization with respect to the OECD validation principles for (Q)SARs and an external evaluation for predictivity. , 2007, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[17]  A. Natsch,et al.  Utility and limitations of a peptide reactivity assay to predict fragrance allergens in vitro. , 2007, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[18]  G Patlewicz,et al.  Global (Q)SARs for skin sensitisation–assessment against OECD principles , 2007, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[19]  I Kimber,et al.  Alternative approaches to the identification and characterization of chemical allergens. , 2001, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[20]  D. Roberts,et al.  Structure‐activity relationships in the murine local lymph node assay for skin sensitization: α,β‐diketones , 1999, Contact dermatitis.

[21]  Mervyn L Richardson,et al.  Risk assessment of chemicals in the environment , 1988 .

[22]  Grace Patlewicz,et al.  Mechanistic applicability domains for non-animal based prediction of toxicological endpoints. QSAR analysis of the schiff base applicability domain for skin sensitization. , 2006, Chemical research in toxicology.

[23]  H. Godfrey,et al.  The effect of physical and chemical properties of the sensitizing substance on the induction and elicitation of delayed contact sensitivity. , 1971, Journal of immunology.

[24]  Tier Grace,et al.  Skin Sensitisation (Q)SARs/Expert Systems: from Past, Present to Future , 2007 .

[25]  D W Roberts,et al.  Molecular orbital parameters as predictors of skin sensitization potential of halo- and pseudohalobenzenes acting as SNAr electrophiles. , 1997, Chemical research in toxicology.

[26]  M T D Cronin,et al.  A conceptual framework for predicting the toxicity of reactive chemicals: modeling soft electrophilicity , 2006, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[27]  G. Klopman MULTICASE 1. A Hierarchical Computer Automated Structure Evaluation Program , 1992 .

[28]  David W Roberts,et al.  From experiment to theory: molecular orbital parameters to interpret the skin sensitization potential of 5-chloro-2-methylisothiazol-3-one and 2-methylisothiazol-3-one. , 2005, Chemical research in toxicology.

[29]  D. D. Perrin,et al.  pKa prediction for organic acids and bases , 1981 .

[30]  Joan Eilstein,et al.  Synthesis and reactivity toward nucleophilic amino acids of 2,5-[13C]-dimethyl-p-benzoquinonediimine. , 2006, Chemical research in toxicology.

[31]  G. Dupuis,et al.  Allergic contact dermatitis to simple chemicals : a molecular approach , 1982 .

[32]  Eva Schlede,et al.  Development and Prevalidation of a List of Structure–Activity Relationship Rules to be Used in Expert Systems for Prediction of the Skin-sensitising Properties of Chemicals , 2004, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[33]  D A Basketter,et al.  An expert system rulebase for identifying contact allergens. , 1994, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[34]  G. Patlewicz,et al.  Further evaluation of quantitative structure–activity relationship models for the prediction of the skin sensitization potency of selected fragrance allergens , 2004, Contact dermatitis.

[35]  Ian Kimber,et al.  What makes a chemical an allergen? , 2003, Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology.

[36]  D A Basketter,et al.  Multivariate QSAR analysis of a skin sensitization database. , 1994, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[37]  R. Guy,et al.  Methods for Assessing Percutaneous Absorption , 1996 .

[38]  Petra S Kern,et al.  Mechanistic applicability domain classification of a local lymph node assay dataset for skin sensitization. , 2007, Chemical research in toxicology.

[39]  H S Rosenkranz,et al.  Prioritizing testing of organic compounds detected as gas phase air pollutants: structure-activity study for human contact allergens. , 1997, Environmental health perspectives.

[40]  M. D. Barratt,et al.  Validation and Subsequent Development of the Derek Skin Sensitization Rulebase by Analysis of the BgVV List of Contact Allergens , 1999, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[41]  D W Roberts,et al.  Structure-activity relationships for contact allergenic potential of gamma,gamma-dimethyl-gamma-butyrolactone derivatives. 2. Quantitative structure-skin sensitization relationships for alpha-substituted-alpha-methyl-gamma,gamma-dimethyl-gamma-butyrolactone s. , 1994, Chemical research in toxicology.

[42]  D. Roberts,et al.  A quantitative structure activity/dose response relationship for contact allergic potential of alkyl group transfer agents , 1990, Contact dermatitis.

[43]  D. Roberts,et al.  Quantitative structure‐activity relationships for skin sensitization potential of urushiol analogues , 1993, Contact dermatitis.

[44]  M. Pavan,et al.  The role of the European Chemicals Bureau in promoting the regulatory use of (Q)SAR methods , 2007, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[45]  Grace Patlewicz,et al.  A comparison of reactivity schemes for the prediction skin sensitization potential. , 2008, Chemical research in toxicology.

[46]  Grace Patlewicz,et al.  Skin sensitization: reaction mechanistic applicability domains for structure-activity relationships. , 2005, Chemical research in toxicology.

[47]  David Basketter,et al.  The chemistry of contact allergy: why is a molecule allergenic? , 1995, Contact dermatitis.

[48]  C Smith Pease,et al.  From xenobiotic chemistry and metabolism to better prediction and risk assessment of skin allergy , 2003 .

[49]  Eva Schlede,et al.  Evaluation of a Rule Base for Identifying Contact Allergens by using a Regulatory Database: Comparison of Data on Chemicals Notified in the European Union with “Structural Alerts” Used in the DEREK Expert System , 2002, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[50]  K. Landsteiner,et al.  STUDIES ON THE SENSITIZATION OF ANIMALS WITH SIMPLE CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS. II , 1936, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[51]  Yi Li,et al.  Categorical QSAR Models for skin sensitization based upon local lymph node assay classification measures part 2: 4D-fingerprint three-state and two-2-state logistic regression models. , 2007, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[52]  Kristina Luthman,et al.  Allergic contact dermatitis--formation, structural requirements, and reactivity of skin sensitizers. , 2008, Chemical research in toxicology.

[53]  J. Jaworska,et al.  Summary of a workshop on regulatory acceptance of (Q)SARs for human health and environmental endpoints. , 2003, Environmental health perspectives.

[54]  A. Leo,et al.  Substituent constants for correlation analysis in chemistry and biology , 1979 .

[55]  M. Wolff,et al.  BURGER'S MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY AND DRUG DISCOVERY , 1996 .

[56]  I. Kimber,et al.  REVIEWCytokines and chemokines in the initiation and regulation of epidermal Langerhans cell mobilization , 2000, The British journal of dermatology.

[57]  David W Roberts,et al.  Mechanistic applicability domains for nonanimal-based prediction of toxicological end points: general principles and application to reactive toxicity. , 2006, Chemical research in toxicology.

[58]  G Patlewicz,et al.  Mechanism based structure-activity relationships for skin sensitisation--the carbonyl group domain , 2002, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[59]  M. Barratt,et al.  Development of an expert system rulebase for identifying contact allergens. , 1994, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[60]  D. Roberts,et al.  A quantitative structure-activity/dose relationship for contact allergenic potential of alkyl group transfer agents. , 1990, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[61]  Ian Kimber,et al.  A chemical dataset for evaluation of alternative approaches to skin‐sensitization testing , 2004, Contact dermatitis.

[62]  D W Roberts,et al.  Structure‐activity relationships for skin sensitisation potential of diacrylates and dimethacrylates , 1987, Contact dermatitis.

[63]  T. Schultz,et al.  Abiotic sulfhydryl reactivity: a predictor of aquatic toxicity for carbonyl-containing alpha,beta-unsaturated compounds. , 2007, Chemical research in toxicology.

[64]  Manuela Pavan,et al.  The Characterisation of (Quantitative) Structure-Activity Relationships: Preliminary Guidance , 2005 .

[65]  D W Roberts,et al.  Further evaluation of the quantitative structure‐activity relationship for skin‐sensitizing alkyl transfer agents , 1997, Contact dermatitis.

[66]  R. Lipnick Outliers: their origin and use in the classification of molecular mechanisms of toxicity. , 1991, The Science of the total environment.

[67]  D. J. Reed,et al.  High-performance liquid chromatography of thiols and disulfides: dinitrophenol derivatives. , 1987, Methods in enzymology.

[68]  Grace Patlewicz,et al.  Electrophilic chemistry related to skin sensitization. Reaction mechanistic applicability domain classification for a published data set of 106 chemicals tested in the mouse local lymph node assay. , 2007, Chemical research in toxicology.

[69]  Carl Westmoreland,et al.  A future approach to measuring relative skin sensitising potency: a proposal , 2006, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[70]  Massimo Pandolfo,et al.  Molecular Basis , 2022 .

[71]  K Enslein,et al.  A quantitative structure-toxicity relationships model for the dermal sensitization guinea pig maximization assay. , 1997, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[72]  Petra S. Kern,et al.  Skin Sensitization: Modeling Based on Skin Metabolism Simulation and Formation of Protein Conjugates , 2005, International journal of toxicology.

[73]  H S Rosenkranz,et al.  Evaluating clinical case report data for SAR modeling of allergic contact dermatitis , 1996, Human & experimental toxicology.

[74]  D W Roberts,et al.  Correlations between skin sensitization potential and chemical reactivity for p-nitrobenzyl compounds. , 1983, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[75]  I Kimber,et al.  Skin sensitisation, vehicle effects and the local lymph node assay. , 2001, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[76]  Grace Patlewicz,et al.  Non-enzymatic glutathione reactivity and in vitro toxicity: a non-animal approach to skin sensitization. , 2006, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[77]  Howard I. Maibach,et al.  A classification model for allergic contact dermatitis , 1994 .

[78]  Gergana Dimitrova,et al.  A Stepwise Approach for Defining the Applicability Domain of SAR and QSAR Models , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[79]  Thomas Rustemeyer,et al.  Mechanisms of Allergic Contact Dermatitis , 2018, Kanerva’s Occupational Dermatology.

[80]  Orest T. Macina,et al.  QSAR FOR ALLERGIC CONTACT DERMATITIS , 1996 .

[81]  Sue Gibbs,et al.  Xenobiotic metabolism in human skin and 3D human skin reconstructs: a review. , 2007, Current drug metabolism.

[82]  Ian Kimber,et al.  Compilation of Historical Local Lymph Node Data for Evaluation of Skin Sensitization Alternative Methods , 2005, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[83]  G Frank Gerberick,et al.  Development of a peptide reactivity assay for screening contact allergens. , 2004, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[84]  T W Schultz,et al.  Structure–activity relationships for abiotic thiol reactivity and aquatic toxicity of halo-substituted carbonyl compounds , 2007, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[85]  Carol A Marchant,et al.  Structure–activity relationships for skin sensitization: recent improvements to Derek for Windows , 2006, Contact dermatitis.

[86]  Ian Kimber,et al.  Impact of Cutaneous IL-10 on Resident Epidermal Langerhans’ Cells and the Development of Polarized Immune Responses , 2005, The Journal of Immunology.

[87]  Petra S Kern,et al.  TIMES-SS--a mechanistic evaluation of an external validation study using reaction chemistry principles. , 2007, Chemical research in toxicology.

[88]  David W. Roberts,et al.  A Minireview of Available Skin Sensitization (Q)SARs/Expert Systems , 2008 .

[89]  David W Roberts,et al.  Determinants of skin sensitisation potential , 2008, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[90]  G Patlewicz,et al.  An evaluation of selected global (Q)SARs/expert systems for the prediction of skin sensitisation potential , 2007, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[91]  G. Patlewicz,et al.  Skin‐sensitization structure‐activity relationships for aldehydes , 2001, Contact dermatitis.