Effects of perceptual phonetic training on the perception and production of second language syllable structure

Abstract This study investigated the effect of perceptual training on second language (L2) learners' perception and production of syllable structure, thereby shedding light on the relationship between L2 speech perception and production and on the nature of stored representations. Korean L2 learners of English completed perceptual training on palatal codas in a pretest–post-test design. We compared the effects of training on improvements in perception and production for trained and new words and talkers. A control group who completed an unrelated perceptual training was included for comparison. Results indicated that learners who received perceptual training on palatal codas outperformed those who did not in perception and production tasks and generalized learning to new words and new talkers. Yet perception improvements were not directly linked to production improvements. The finding that perceptual training improved production and allowed for generalizability to new words and talkers in both perception and production provides evidence that L2 perception and production systems are linked. However, the lack of a one-to-one relationship between perception and production improvements suggests that the representations underlying L2 speech perception and production may be distinct.

[1]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Eunjin Oh,et al.  Coarticulation in non-native speakers of English and French: An acoustic study , 2008, J. Phonetics.

[3]  D. Steriade,et al.  What we know about what we have never heard: Evidence from perceptual illusions , 2007, Cognition.

[4]  C. Fowler Real Objects of Speech Perception: A Commentary on Diehl and Kluender , 1989 .

[5]  Robert S. Carlisle THE ACQUISITION OF ONSETS IN A MARKEDNESS RELATIONSHIP , 1998, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[6]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Terrance M. Nearey,et al.  The segment as a unit of speech perception , 1990 .

[8]  Donald G. MacKay,et al.  The organization of perception and action. A theory for language and other cognitive skills , 1987, The Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences.

[9]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Can native Japanese listeners learn to differentiate /r–l/ on the basis of F3 onset frequency? – CORRIGENDUM , 2012, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[10]  William L. Martens,et al.  The effects of identification training on the identification and production of American English vowels by native speakers of Japanese , 2005, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[11]  J. Mehler,et al.  Epenthetic vowels in Japanese: A perceptual illusion? , 1999, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

[12]  Ulrich H. Frauenfelder,et al.  The processing of illegal consonant clusters: A case of perceptual assimilation? , 1998 .

[13]  W. Strange,et al.  The acquisition of /r/ and /l/ by Japanese learners of English: Evidence that speech production can precede speech perception , 1982, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[14]  J. Ohala,et al.  Speech perception is hearing sounds, not tongues. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Emmanuel Dupoux,et al.  Electrophysiological Correlates of Phonological Processing: A Cross-linguistic Study , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  Lisa Davidson Phonetic, phonemic, and phonological factors in cross-language discrimination of phonotactic contrasts. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  Elizabeth C. Zsiga ARTICULATORY TIMING IN A SECOND LANGUAGE , 2003, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[18]  Lisa Davidson,et al.  Phonology, phonetics, or frequency: Influences on the production of non-native sequences , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[19]  William Labov,et al.  The atlas of North American English : phonetics, phonology and sound change : a multimedia reference tool , 2006 .

[20]  Emmanuel Dupoux,et al.  Where Do Illusory Vowels Come from , 2011 .

[21]  Sharon Peperkamp,et al.  Reinterpreting loanword adaptations: the role of perception , 2003 .

[22]  Fred R. Eckman,et al.  Sonority and markedness among onset clusters in the interlanguage of ESL learners , 1993 .

[23]  J. Flege Assessing constraints on second-language segmental production and perception , 2003 .

[24]  R. Stickgold,et al.  Sleep-Dependent Learning and Memory Consolidation , 2004, Neuron.

[25]  V. Mann,et al.  Lexical familiarity and English-language experience affect Japanese adults' perception of / / and /l/. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  Lisa Davidson Addressing phonological questions with ultrasound , 2005, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[27]  James Emil Flege,et al.  Cross-language switching in stop consonant perception and production by Dutch speakers of english , 1987, Speech Commun..

[28]  Kenneth J. de Jong,et al.  Evidence for featural units in the acquisition of speech production skills: Linguistic structure in foreign accent , 2009, J. Phonetics.

[29]  A. Lotto,et al.  Cue weighting in auditory categorization: implications for first and second language acquisition. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  Jason A. Shaw,et al.  Sources of illusion in consonant cluster perception , 2012, J. Phonetics.

[31]  C. Best The emergence of native-language phonological influences in infants: A perceptual assimilation model. , 1994 .

[32]  C. Fowler An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct realist perspective , 1986 .

[33]  C. Best,et al.  Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener's native phonological system. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  Kaori Idemaru,et al.  Individual differences in cue weights are stable across time: the case of Japanese stop lengths. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[36]  Paul Iverson,et al.  Phonetic training with acoustic cue manipulations: a comparison of methods for teaching English /r/-/l/ to Japanese adults. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  Lori L. Holt,et al.  Predicting native English-like performance by native Japanese speakers , 2011, J. Phonetics.

[38]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: a first report. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  A. M. Schmidt,et al.  Traditional and phonological treatment for teaching English fricatives and affricates to Koreans. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[40]  Robert S. Carlisle The modification of onsets in a markedness relationship : Testing the interlanguage structural conformity hypothesis , 1997 .

[41]  M. Stone,et al.  Epenthesis Versus Gestural Mistiming in Consonant Cluster Production : An Ultrasound Study , 2003 .

[42]  Andrew Lotto,et al.  Language Acquisition as Complex Category Formation , 2000, Phonetica.

[43]  Randy L. Diehl,et al.  MAPPING THE TASK FOR THE SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNER: THE CASE OF JAPANESE ACQUISITION OF /R/ AND /L/ , 2004 .

[44]  C A Fowler,et al.  Auditory perception is not special: we see the world, we feel the world, we hear the world. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat: doing phonetics by computer , 2003 .

[46]  Hanyong Park,et al.  Detecting foreign accent in monosyllables: The role of L1 phonotactics , 2013, J. Phonetics.

[47]  C A Fowler,et al.  Listeners do hear sounds, not tongues. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[48]  Randy L. Diehl On segments and segment boundaries , 1987 .

[49]  U. Frauenfelder,et al.  Processing of illegal consonant clusters : A case of perceptual assimilation ? , 1998 .

[50]  E. Broselow Stress adaptation in loanword phonology : perception and learnability * , 2007 .

[51]  H. Goto,et al.  Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds "L" and "R". , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[52]  R. Diehl,et al.  On the Objects of Speech Perception , 1989 .

[53]  Lisa Davidson,et al.  Phonetic bases of similarities in cross-language production: Evidence from English and Catalan , 2010, J. Phonetics.

[54]  Ocke-Schwen Bohn,et al.  Perception and production of a new vowel category by adult second language learners , 1997 .

[55]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Success and failure in teaching the [r]-[l] contrast to Japanese adults: Tests of a Hebbian model of plasticity and stabilization in spoken language perception , 2002, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[56]  W. Idsardi,et al.  Perceptual Distortions in the Adaptation of English Consonant Clusters: Syllable Structure or Consonantal Contact Constraints? , 2007, Language and speech.

[57]  C. Best,et al.  Nonnative and second-language speech perception : commonalities and complementarities , 2007 .

[58]  Jeffrey Steele,et al.  Integrating articulatory constraints into models of second language phonological acquisition , 2008, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[59]  J. Mehler,et al.  New evidence for prelexical phonological processing in word recognition , 2001 .

[60]  K. Brannen The Role of Perception in Differential Substitution , 2002, Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique.

[61]  C. Best A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception , 1995 .

[62]  Barbara Hancin-Bhatt Optimality in second language phonology: codas in Thai ESL , 2000 .

[63]  Ellen Broselow,et al.  THE EMERGENCE OF THE UNMARKED IN SECOND LANGUAGE PHONOLOGY , 1998, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[64]  Paul Iverson,et al.  Auditory training of English vowels for first-language speakers of Spanish and German , 2007 .

[65]  P K Kuhl,et al.  Theoretical contributions of tests on animals to the special-mechanisms debate in speech. , 1986, Experimental biology.

[66]  C A Fowler,et al.  Invariants, specifiers, cues: An investigation of locus equations as information for place of articulation , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[67]  J. Flege Second Language Speech Learning Theory , Findings , and Problems , 2006 .

[68]  John Kingston,et al.  Phonetic Knowledge , 2015 .

[69]  I. R. MacKay,et al.  Native Italian speakers' perception and production of English vowels. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[70]  James Emil Flege,et al.  Perception and production: the relevance of phonetic input to L2 phonological learning , 1991 .

[71]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Categorization and discrimination of nonspeech sounds: differences between steady-state and rapidly-changing acoustic cues. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[72]  Keith R. Kluender,et al.  Speech perception as a tractable problem in cognitive science. , 1994 .

[73]  P. Iverson,et al.  Plasticity in vowel perception and production: a study of accent change in young adults. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[74]  J. Born,et al.  The contribution of sleep to hippocampus-dependent memory consolidation , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[75]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[76]  V. Mann,et al.  Japanese Adults can Learn to Produce English /I/ and /l/ Accurately , 1995, Language and speech.

[77]  Daniel Finer,et al.  Parameter setting in second language phonology and syntax , 1991 .

[78]  Rakesh Mohan Bhatt,et al.  Optimal L2 Syllables: Interactions of Transfer and Developmental Effects. , 1997 .

[79]  Y. Tohkura,et al.  A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non-native phonemes , 2003, Cognition.

[80]  R. Stickgold Sleep-dependent memory consolidation , 2005, Nature.

[81]  Annie Tremblay,et al.  PROFICIENCY ASSESSMENT STANDARDS IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION RESEARCH , 2011, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[82]  J. Flege,et al.  Effects of experience on non-native speakers' production and perception of English vowels , 1997 .