An Investigation into Relationships between Classroom Acoustic Measurements and Voice Parameters of Teachers

School teachers appear to have a greater prevalence of voice problems than the general population, yet classrooms are not designed with the safe use of teachers' voices in mind. In an effort to better understand the influence of classroom acoustic design on teachers' voice parameters measurements of teachers' voices in different classroom types have been made. An Ambulatory Phonation Monitor (APM) has been used to measure voice parameters (including the average voice sound pressure level, fundamental frequency and phonation time) directly from the skin vibrations in the neck, thus eliminating the effects of other noise sources in the environment. The rooms involved were acoustically benchmarked individually to enable relationships between the voice data and acoustic parameters, such as unoccupied ambient noise levels and reverberation times, to be investigated. The study data shows a positive correlation between unoccupied ambient noise levels and the average voice levels of the teachers, as well as between voice level and phonation time. There was no significant correlation in the study data between classroom reverberation times and voice levels or between voice level and fundamental frequency.

[1]  Jonas Brunskog,et al.  Speakers' comfort and voice level variation in classrooms: laboratory research. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  I. Titze,et al.  Measurement of vocal fold intraglottal pressure and impact stress. , 1994, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[3]  S. Gray,et al.  Frequency and effects of teachers' voice problems. , 1997, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[4]  Robert E Hillman,et al.  Development and testing of a portable vocal accumulator. , 2003, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[5]  W. Olsen,et al.  Average Speech Levels and Spectra in Various Speaking/Listening Conditions: A Summary of the Pearson, Bennett, & Fidell (1977) Report. , 1998, American journal of audiology.

[6]  Julie Dockrell,et al.  A survey of acoustic conditions and noise levels in secondary school classrooms in England. , 2015, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Ingo R Titze,et al.  Estimation of sound pressure levels of voiced speech from skin vibration of the neck. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  A Russell,et al.  Prevalence of voice problems in teachers. , 1998, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[9]  J. Švec,et al.  Measurement of vocal doses in speech: experimental procedure and signal processing. , 2003, Logopedics, phoniatrics, vocology.

[10]  Barbara Dodd,et al.  Is there an effect of dysphonic teachers' voices on children's processing of spoken language? , 2005, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[11]  Pasquale Bottalico,et al.  Relationship between vocal doses and voice disorders on primary school teachers , 2012 .

[12]  増田 孝,et al.  Analysis of vocal abuse : fluctuations in phonation time and intensity in 4 groups of speakers , 1995 .

[13]  W Seidner,et al.  Recommendation by the Union of European Phoniatricians (UEP): standardizing voice area measurement/phonetography. , 1983, Folia phoniatrica.