Randomized study of intensified anthracycline doses for induction and recombinant interleukin-2 for maintenance in patients with acute myeloid leukemia age 50 to 70 years: results of the ALFA-9801 study.

PURPOSE In patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), induction chemotherapy is based on standard doses of anthracyclines and cytarabine. High doses of cytarabine have been reported as being too toxic for patients older than age 50 years, but few studies have evaluated intensified doses of anthracyclines. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this randomized Acute Leukemia French Association 9801 (ALFA-9801) study, high doses of daunorubicin (DNR; 80 mg/m(2)/d x 3 days) or idarubicin (IDA4; 12 mg/m(2)/d x 4 days) were compared with standard doses of idarubicin (IDA3; 12 mg/m(2)/d x 3 days) for remission induction in patients age 50 to 70 years, with an event-free survival (EFS) end point. After two consolidation courses based on intermediate doses of cytarabine, patients in continuous remission were randomly assigned to receive or not receive maintenance therapy with recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2; 5 x 10(6) U/m(2) x 5 days each month) for a total duration of 12 months. A total of 468 patients entered the study (median age, 60 years). Results Overall complete remission rate was 77% with significant differences among the three randomization arms (83%, 78%, and 70% in the IDA3, IDA4, and DNR arms, respectively; P = .04). However, no significant differences were observed in relapse incidence, EFS, or overall survival among the three arms. In the 161 patients randomly assigned for maintenance therapy, no difference in outcome was observed between the rIL-2 and the no further treatment arms. CONCLUSION Neither intensification of anthracycline doses nor maintenance with rIL-2 showed a significant impact on AML course, at least as scheduled in this trial.

[1]  M. Tallman,et al.  A randomized trial of anthracycline dose intensification during induction of younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia: Results of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study E1900. , 2009, Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  C. Strahlendorf,et al.  Providing research results to participants: attitudes and needs of adolescents and parents of children with cancer. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  T. Naoe,et al.  Updated Results of JALSG AML201 Study Comparing Intensified Daunorubicin with Idarubicin in Patients with De Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Effect of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. , 2008 .

[4]  M. Caligiuri,et al.  Low-dose interleukin-2 immunotherapy does not improve outcome of patients age 60 years and older with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study 9720. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  S. Feig,et al.  Outcomes in CCG-2961, a children's oncology group phase 3 trial for untreated pediatric acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the children's oncology group. , 2008, Blood.

[6]  W. Hofmann,et al.  Improved leukemia-free survival after postconsolidation immunotherapy with histamine dihydrochloride and interleukin-2 in acute myeloid leukemia: results of a randomized phase 3 trial. , 2006, Blood.

[7]  H. Dombret,et al.  Randomized comparison of double induction and timed-sequential induction to a "3 + 7" induction in adults with AML: long-term analysis of the Acute Leukemia French Association (ALFA) 9000 study. , 2004, Blood.

[8]  D. Neuberg,et al.  A phase 3 study of three induction regimens and of priming with GM-CSF in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia: a trial by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. , 2004, Blood.

[9]  C. Bloomfield,et al.  Revised recommendations of the International Working Group for Diagnosis, Standardization of Response Criteria, Treatment Outcomes, and Reporting Standards for Therapeutic Trials in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  Robert Gray,et al.  A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk , 1999 .

[11]  E. Estey,et al.  A pilot study of interleukin‐2 for adult patients with acute myelogenous leukemia in first complete remission , 1999, Cancer.

[12]  T. H. A. C. O. G. Roup A systematic collaborative overview of randomized trials comparing idarubicin with daunorubicin (or other anthracyclines) as induction therapy for acute myeloid leukaemia , 1998 .

[13]  M. Grever,et al.  A randomized investigation of high-dose versus standard-dose cytosine arabinoside with daunorubicin in patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia: a Southwest Oncology Group study. , 1996, Blood.

[14]  P. Berthaud,et al.  Treatment of acute myelogenous leukaemia in patients aged 50–65: idarubicin is more effective than zorubicin for remission induction and prolonged disease‐free survival can be obtained using a unique consolidation course , 1996, British journal of haematology.

[15]  J. Reiffers,et al.  A prospective randomized trial of idarubicin vs daunorubicin in combination chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia of the age group 55 to 75. , 1996, Leukemia.

[16]  O. Garson,et al.  A randomized study of high-dose cytarabine in induction in acute myeloid leukemia. , 1996, Blood.

[17]  L. Bergmann,et al.  Interleukin-2 bolus infusion as late consolidation therapy in 2nd remission of acute myeloblastic leukemia. , 1995, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[18]  R. Foà,et al.  Interleukin-2 may induce prolonged remissions in advanced acute myelogenous leukemia. , 1994, Blood.

[19]  R. Foà,et al.  In vitro susceptibility of acute leukemia cells to the cytotoxic activity of allogeneic and autologous lymphokine activated killer (LAK) effectors: correlation with the rate and duration of complete remission and with survival. , 1994, Leukemia.

[20]  A. Bartolucci,et al.  A phase III trial comparing idarubicin and daunorubicin in combination with cytarabine in acute myelogenous leukemia: a Southeastern Cancer Study Group Study. , 1992, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  P. Ritch,et al.  Cytarabine plus idarubicin or daunorubicin as induction and consolidation therapy for previously untreated adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia. , 1992, Blood.

[22]  F. Mandelli,et al.  A randomised clinical trial comparing idarubicin and cytarabine to daunorubicin and cytarabine in the treatment of acute non-lymphoid leukaemia , 1991 .

[23]  Janice Gabrilove,et al.  Results of a randomized trial comparing idarubicin and cytosine arabinoside with daunorubicin and cytosine arabinoside in adult patients with newly diagnosed acute myelogenous leukemia , 1991 .

[24]  E. Archimbaud,et al.  Inducibility of lymphokine activated killer (LAK) cells in patients with acute myelogenous leukaemia in complete remission and its clinical relevance , 1991, British journal of haematology.

[25]  F. Mandelli,et al.  A randomised clinical trial comparing idarubicin and cytarabine to daunorubicin and cytarabine in the treatment of acute non-lymphoid leukaemia. A multicentric study from the Italian Co-operative Group GIMEMA. , 1991, European journal of cancer.

[26]  R. Gray A Class of $K$-Sample Tests for Comparing the Cumulative Incidence of a Competing Risk , 1988 .

[27]  J. Peto,et al.  Asymptotically Efficient Rank Invariant Test Procedures , 1972 .

[28]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .

[29]  D.,et al.  Regression Models and Life-Tables , 2022 .