Deployment of fingertip forces in tactile exploration

Abstract. The purpose of this study was to examine how contact forces normal to the skin surface and shear forces tangential to the skin surface are deployed during tactile exploration of a smooth surface in search of a tactile target. Six naive subjects participated in two experiments. In the first experiment, the subjects were asked to explore a series of unseen smooth plastic surfaces by using the index finger to search for either a raised or recessed target. The raised targets were squares with a height of 280 µm above the background surface and that varied in side lengths from 0.2 mm to 8.0 mm. A second series of smooth plastic surfaces consisted of small recessed squares (side lengths: 2.0, 3.0, 4.0 and 8.0 mm) that were etched to a depth of 620 µm. Although made of an identical material, the plastic substrate had a lower coefficient of friction against the skin because only the recessed square had been subjected to the electrolytic etching process. The surfaces were mounted on a six-axes force and torque sensor connected to a laboratory computer. From the three axes of linear force, the computer was able to calculate the instantaneous position of the index finger and the instantaneous tangential force throughout the exploratory period. When exploring for the raised squares, the subjects maintained a relatively constant, average normal force of about 0.49 N with an average exploration speed of 8.6 cm/s. In contrast, all subjects used a significantly higher average normal force (0.64 N) and slightly slower mean exploration speed (7.67 cm/s) when searching for the small recessed squares. This appeared to be an attempt to maximize the amount of skin penetrating the recessed squares to improve the probability of target detection. In a second experiment, subjects were requested to search for an identical set of raised squares but with the fingertip having been coated with sucrose to impede the scanning movement by increasing the friction. Overall, the subjects maintained the same constant normal force that they used on the uncoated surface. However, they increased the tangential force significantly. The similarity of the search strategy employed by all subjects supports the hypothesis that shear forces on the skin provide a significant stimulus to mechanoreceptors in the skin during tactile exploration. Taken together, these data suggest that, in active tactile exploration with the fingertip, the tangential finger speed, the normal contact force, and the tangential shear force are adjusted optimally depending on the surface friction and whether the target is a raised asperity or a recessed indentation.

[1]  R. Johansson,et al.  Tactile sensibility in the human hand: relative and absolute densities of four types of mechanoreceptive units in glabrous skin. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  Masahiro Sakamoto,et al.  Deficits in manipulative behaviors induced by local injections of muscimol in the first somatosensory cortex of the conscious monkey , 1985, Brain Research.

[3]  R H LaMotte,et al.  Tactile detection of a dot on a smooth surface: peripheral neural events. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Tactual discrimination of softness. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  A. M. Smith,et al.  Subjective scaling of smooth surface friction. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  A. M. Smith,et al.  Friction, not texture, dictates grip forces used during object manipulation. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  M A Srinivasan,et al.  Neural encoding of shape: responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors to a wavy surface stroked across the monkey fingerpad. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  K. O. Johnson,et al.  Monkey cutaneous SAI and RA responses to raised and depressed scanned patterns: effects of width, height, orientation, and a raised surround. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  K. Zilles,et al.  t Object Shape Differences Reflected by Somatosensory Cortical Activation , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  C. E. Chapman,et al.  Relative effects of the spatial and temporal characteristics of scanned surfaces on human perception of tactile roughness using passive touch , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  H. Freund,et al.  Tactile apraxia: unimodal apractic disorder of tactile object exploration associated with parietal lobe lesions. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  R. Johansson,et al.  Encoding of Direction of Fingertip Forces by Human Tactile Afferents , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  C. E. Chapman,et al.  Role of friction and tangential force variation in the subjective scaling of tactile roughness , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  M. Paré,et al.  Distribution and terminal arborizations of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the glabrous finger pads of the monkey , 2002, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[16]  A. Goodwin,et al.  Tactile discrimination of gratings , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  R. S. Johansson,et al.  Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objects , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  R. Johansson,et al.  Factors influencing the force control during precision grip , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  J. Flanagan,et al.  Modulation of grip force with load force during point-to-point arm movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  H. Freund,et al.  Invariant temporal characteristics of manipulative hand movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.