Evaluation of runner cone extension to dampen pressure pulsations in a Francis model turbine

Today's energy market has a high demand of flexibility due to introduction of other intermittent renewables as wind and solar. To ensure a steady power supply, hydro turbines are often forced to operate more at part load conditions. Originally, turbines were built for steady operation around the best efficiency point. The demand of flexibility, combined with old designs has showed an increase in turbines having problems with hydrodynamic instabilities such as pressure pulsations. Different methods have been investigated to mitigate pressure pulsations. Air injection shows a significant reduction of pressure pulsation amplitudes. However, installation of air injection requires extra piping and a compressor. Investigation of other methods such as shaft extension shows promising results for some operational points, but may significantly reduce the efficiency of the turbine at other operational points. The installation of an extension of the runner cone has been investigated at NTNU by Vekve in 2004. This has resulted in a cylindrical extension at Litjfossen Power Plant in Norway, where the bolt suffered mechanical failure. This indicates high amplitude pressure pulsations in the draft tube centre. The high pressure pulsation amplitudes are believed to be related to high tangential velocity in the draft tube. The mentioned runner cone extension has further been developed to a freely rotating extension. The objective is to reduce the tangential velocity in the draft tube and thereby the pressure pulsation amplitudes.

[1]  Sebastian Muntean,et al.  Experimental investigations of the unsteady flow in a Francis turbine draft tube cone , 2010 .

[2]  T. O’Doherty,et al.  Vortex breakdown: a review , 2001 .

[3]  Luis F. Razon,et al.  Progress in Energy and Combustion Science , 2016 .

[4]  Peter Dörfler,et al.  Flow-Induced Pulsation and Vibration in Hydroelectric Machinery: Engineer’s Guidebook for Planning, Design and Troubleshooting , 2012 .

[5]  X. M. Wang,et al.  An Experimental Study on Fins, Their Role in Control of the Draft Tube Surging , 1996 .

[6]  Philip J. Smith,et al.  Modeling of swirl in turbulent flow systems , 1986 .

[7]  Fernando Casanova García,et al.  Experimental analysis of the vibration on the draft tube of a Francis hydraulic turbine during operation at different power levels , 2010 .

[8]  J. Hardin The velocity field induced by a helical vortex filament , 1982 .

[9]  Michihiro Nishi,et al.  An Outlook on the Draft-Tube-Surge Study , 2013 .

[10]  Michel Cervantes Counter rotating runner cone in a Kaplan elbow draft tube for increased efficiency , 2009 .

[11]  Mingming Xu,et al.  Laminated manufacturing and milling electrical discharge dressing of metal-bonded diamond grinding wheels , 2012 .

[12]  Brian Launder,et al.  Numerical methods in laminar and turbulent flow , 1983 .

[13]  John J. Cassidy,et al.  Observations of unsteady flow arising after vortex breakdown , 1970, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[14]  Michel Cervantes,et al.  Experimental investigation of a Kaplan draft tube – Part II: Off-design conditions , 2012 .

[15]  Thomas Vekve,et al.  An experimental investigation of draft tube flow , 2004 .