Local surface model–based deinterlacing algorithm

We present an efficient deinterlacing method via mathematical modeling of the neighbor pixels in the local region. The local surface model is designed using the quadratic equation having two-dimensional coordinate variables. Unlike conventional deinterlacing methods, the proposed method avoids using directional difference measures, resulting in reduced limitation on the number of considering edge directions. By modeling the local surface, it is easier to derive the true characteristic of the local region in a natural image than utilizing the directional difference measure. In order to decide the optimal coefficients of the surface model, the neighbor pixels around the current pixel to be interpolated are utilized. Once the coefficients are determined, the surface model estimates the pixel intensity of the current pixel to be interpolated. Simulation results show that the proposed surface model-based deinterlacing method minimizes the interpolation error. Compared to the traditional deinterlacing methods and Wiener filter-based interpolation method, the proposed method improves the subjective quality of the interpolated edges while maintaining a higher peak signal-to-noise-ratio level.

[1]  Moon Gi Kang,et al.  New edge dependent deinterlacing algorithm based on horizontal edge pattern , 2003, IEEE Trans. Consumer Electron..

[2]  Demin Wang,et al.  Hybrid de-interlacing algorithm based on motion vector reliability , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[3]  Yeong-Taeg Kim Deinterlacing algorithm based on sparse wide-vector correlations , 1996, Other Conferences.

[4]  Pei-Yin Chen,et al.  A Low-Complexity Interpolation Method for Deinterlacing , 2007, IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Erwin B. Bellers,et al.  De-Interlacing: A Key Technology for Scan Rate Conversion , 2000 .

[6]  N. Jayant,et al.  Digital Coding of Waveforms: Principles and Applications to Speech and Video , 1990 .

[7]  Donghyung Kim,et al.  Fine edge-preserving deinterlacing algorithm for progressive display , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics.

[8]  Jechang Jeong,et al.  Fast sub-pixel motion estimation techniques having lower computational complexity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics.

[9]  Hoon Yoo,et al.  Direction-oriented interpolation and its application to de-interlacing , 2002, IEEE Trans. Consumer Electron..

[10]  Dong-Ho Lee A New Edge-Based Intra-Field Interpolation Method for Deinterlacing using Locally Adaptive-Thresholded Binary Image , 2008, 2008 Digest of Technical Papers - International Conference on Consumer Electronics.

[11]  Hong Ren Wu,et al.  Efficient deinterlacing algorithm using edge-based line average interpolation , 2000 .

[12]  G. de Haan Television Display Processing: Past & Future , 2007 .

[13]  Jechang Jeong,et al.  Fine directional de-interlacing algorithm using modified Sobel operation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics.

[14]  Gwanggil Jeon,et al.  Computation-aware algorithm selection approach for interlaced-to-progressive conversion , 2010 .

[15]  François Michaud,et al.  Fuzzy detection of edge-direction for video line doubling , 1997, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..

[16]  Kwanghoon Sohn,et al.  Deinterlacing using directional interpolation and motion compensation , 2003, IEEE Trans. Consumer Electron..

[17]  Jechang Jeong,et al.  Novel Intra Deinterlacing Algorithm Using Content Adaptive Interpolation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics.

[18]  Keith Jack,et al.  Video Demystified: A Handbook for the Digital Engineer , 1993 .

[19]  M. L. Liou,et al.  Reliable motion detection/compensation for interlaced sequences and its applications to deinterlacing , 2000, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..