Molecular Profiles of Mixed Endometrial Carcinoma
暂无分享,去创建一个
O. Elemento | J. Mosquera | E. Chapman-Davis | L. Ellenson | S. Motanagh | Cathleen E. Matrai | S. Mirabelli | B. Kurtis | B. He | Lucy X Ma
[1] M. Köbel,et al. Targeted Molecular and Immunohistochemical Analyses of Endometrial Clear Cell Carcinoma Show that POLE Mutations and DNA Mismatch Repair Protein Deficiencies Are Uncommon , 2019, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[2] C. Gilks,et al. Issues in the Differential Diagnosis of Uterine Low-grade Endometrioid Carcinoma, Including Mixed Endometrial Carcinomas: Recommendations from the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists , 2018, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.
[3] A. Talhouk,et al. Molecular Subtype Not Immune Response Drives Outcomes in Endometrial Carcinoma , 2018, Clinical Cancer Research.
[4] A. Naiki‐Ito,et al. MET amplification in endometrial cancers with clear‐cell carcinoma components , 2018, Pathology international.
[5] A. Talhouk,et al. Final validation of the ProMisE molecular classifier for endometrial carcinoma in a large population-based case series , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[6] R. Soslow,et al. Molecular insights into the classification of high-grade endometrial carcinoma. , 2017, Pathology.
[7] E. Pirog,et al. Despite Diagnostic Morphology, Many Mixed Endometrial Carcinomas Show Unexpected Immunohistochemical Staining Patterns , 2017, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.
[8] Donavan T. Cheng,et al. The genetic landscape of endometrial clear cell carcinomas , 2017, The Journal of pathology.
[9] J. Prat,et al. Undifferentiated and Dedifferentiated Endometrial Carcinomas With POLE Exonuclease Domain Mutations Have a Favorable Prognosis , 2017, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[10] P. Pollock,et al. FGFR2 mutations are associated with poor outcomes in endometrioid endometrial cancer: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study. , 2017, Gynecologic oncology.
[11] A. Talhouk,et al. Confirmation of ProMisE: A simple, genomics‐based clinical classifier for endometrial cancer , 2017, Cancer.
[12] A. Talhouk,et al. Interobserver Agreement in Endometrial Carcinoma Histotype Diagnosis Varies Depending on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-based Molecular Subgroup , 2017, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[13] A. Talhouk,et al. New classification of endometrial cancers: the development and potential applications of genomic-based classification in research and clinical care , 2016, Gynecologic Oncology Research and Practice.
[14] X. Matías-Guiu,et al. Molecular genetic heterogeneity in undifferentiated endometrial carcinomas , 2016, Modern Pathology.
[15] J. Prat,et al. Mixed and Ambiguous Endometrial Carcinomas: A Heterogenous Group of Tumors With Different Clinicopathologic and Molecular Genetic Features , 2016, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[16] Jorge S Reis-Filho,et al. TP53 Mutational Spectrum in Endometrioid and Serous Endometrial Cancers , 2016, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.
[17] M. Köbel,et al. Molecular Analysis of Mixed Endometrial Carcinomas Shows Clonality in Most Cases , 2015, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[18] M. Köbel,et al. Endometrial Carcinomas With Clear Cells: A Study of a Heterogeneous Group of Tumors Including Interobserver Variability, Mutation Analysis, and Immunohistochemistry With HNF-1&bgr; , 2015, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.
[19] A. Talhouk,et al. A clinically applicable molecular-based classification for endometrial cancers , 2015, British Journal of Cancer.
[20] M. Squires,et al. Second-line dovitinib (TKI258) in patients with FGFR2-mutated or FGFR2-non-mutated advanced or metastatic endometrial cancer: a non-randomised, open-label, two-group, two-stage, phase 2 study. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.
[21] P. Klenerman,et al. POLE Proofreading Mutations Elicit an Antitumor Immune Response in Endometrial Cancer , 2015, Clinical Cancer Research.
[22] B. Karlan,et al. Clinicopathological analysis of endometrial carcinomas harboring somatic POLE exonuclease domain mutations , 2015, Modern Pathology.
[23] P. Pollock,et al. Refining prognosis and identifying targetable pathways for high-risk endometrial cancer; a TransPORTEC initiative , 2015, Modern Pathology.
[24] D. Lambrechts,et al. Mutation profile and clinical outcome of mixed endometrioid-serous endometrial carcinomas are different from that of pure endometrioid or serous carcinomas , 2015, Virchows Archiv.
[25] D. Lambrechts,et al. Prognostic Significance of POLE Proofreading Mutations in Endometrial Cancer , 2014, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[26] B. Clarke,et al. ARID1A loss correlates with mismatch repair deficiency and intact p53 expression in high-grade endometrial carcinomas , 2014, Modern Pathology.
[27] C Blake Gilks,et al. Poor Interobserver Reproducibility in the Diagnosis of High-grade Endometrial Carcinoma , 2013, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[28] Steven J. M. Jones,et al. Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma , 2013, Nature.
[29] R. Soslow. High‐grade endometrial carcinomas – strategies for typing , 2013, Histopathology.
[30] P. Pollock,et al. FGFR2 Point Mutations in 466 Endometrioid Endometrial Tumors: Relationship with MSI, KRAS, PIK3CA, CTNNB1 Mutations and Clinicopathological Features , 2012, PloS one.
[31] Joan Valls,et al. FGFR2 alterations in endometrial carcinoma , 2011, Modern Pathology.
[32] I. Shih,et al. Immunohistochemical staining patterns of p53 can serve as a surrogate marker for TP53 mutations in ovarian carcinoma: an immunohistochemical and nucleotide sequencing analysis , 2011, Modern Pathology.
[33] C. Sung,et al. Minor Serous and Clear Cell Components Adversely Affect Prognosis in ‘‘Mixed-Type’’ Endometrial Carcinomas: A Clinicopathologic Study of 36 Stage-I Cases , 2010, Reproductive Sciences.
[34] P. Pollock,et al. Frequent activating FGFR2 mutations in endometrial carcinomas parallel germline mutations associated with craniosynostosis and skeletal dysplasia syndromes , 2007, Oncogene.
[35] U. Moll,et al. Cytoplasmically “Sequestered” Wild Type p53 Protein Is Resistant to Mdm2-mediated Degradation* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[36] J. Hecht,et al. Morphologic and other clinicopathologic features of endometrial clear cell carcinoma: a comprehensive analysis of 50 rigorously classified cases. , 2013, American journal of cancer research.