Impact of regulatory perturbations to disease spread through cattle movements in Great Britain

During the past decade the British livestock industry has suffered from several major pathogen outbreaks, and a variety of regulatory and disease control measures have been applied to the movement of livestock with the express aim of mitigating the spread of infection. The Rapid Analysis and Detection of Animal-related Risks (RADAR) project, which has been collecting data on the movement of cattle since 1998, provides a relatively comprehensive record of how these policies have influenced the movement of cattle between animal holdings, markets, and slaughterhouses in Britain. Many previous studies have focused on the properties of the network that can be derived from these movements – treating farms as nodes and movements as directed (and potentially weighted) edges in the network. However, of far greater importance is how these policy changes have influenced the potential spread of infectious diseases. Here we use a stochastic fully individual-based model of cattle in Britain to assess how the epidemic potential has varied from 2000 to 2009 as the pattern of movements has changed in response to legislation and market forces. Our simulations show that the majority of policy changes lead to significant decreases in the epidemic potential (measured in multiple ways), but that this potential then increases through time as cattle farmers modify their behaviour in response. Our results suggest that the cattle industry is likely to experience boom-bust dynamics, with the actions that farmers take during epidemic-free periods to maximise their profitability likely to increase the potential for large-scale epidemics to occur.

[1]  S. Wasserman,et al.  Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis , 2005 .

[2]  R. Lysons,et al.  Progress with enhancing veterinary surveillance in the United Kingdom , 2007, Veterinary Record.

[3]  Matt J. Keeling,et al.  Networks and the Epidemiology of Infectious Disease , 2010, Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases.

[4]  M. Everett,et al.  Recent network evolution increases the potential for large epidemics in the British cattle population , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[5]  G. Medley,et al.  Risks for bovine tuberculosis in British cattle farms restocked after the foot and mouth disease epidemic of 2001. , 2008, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[6]  L. Matthews,et al.  The construction and analysis of epidemic trees with reference to the 2001 UK foot–and–mouth outbreak , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Social Network Analysis , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[8]  J. W. Wilesmith,et al.  Descriptive epidemiology of the 2001 foot-and-mouth disease epidemic in Great Britain: the first five months , 2001, Veterinary Record.

[9]  Eljas Soisalon-Soininen,et al.  On Finding the Strongly Connected Components in a Directed Graph , 1994, Inf. Process. Lett..

[10]  I. Kiss,et al.  The network of sheep movements within Great Britain: network properties and their implications for infectious disease spread , 2006, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[11]  C. Witham,et al.  Bluetongue in the United Kingdom and northern Europe in 2007 and key issues for 2008 , 2008, Veterinary Record.

[12]  I. Kiss,et al.  Estimates for local and movement-based transmission of bovine tuberculosis in British cattle , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  C. Dubé,et al.  A review of network analysis terminology and its application to foot-and-mouth disease modelling and policy development. , 2009, Transboundary and emerging diseases.

[14]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[15]  L. Danon,et al.  Demographic structure and pathogen dynamics on the network of livestock movements in Great Britain , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  S. Cornell,et al.  Dynamics of the 2001 UK Foot and Mouth Epidemic: Stochastic Dispersal in a Heterogeneous Landscape , 2001, Science.

[17]  Matt J. Keeling,et al.  Representing the UK's cattle herd as static and dynamic networks , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  M. Gilbert,et al.  Cattle movements and bovine tuberculosis in Great Britain , 2005, Nature.

[19]  M C M Mourits,et al.  Effectiveness of movement-prevention regulations to reduce the spread of foot-and-mouth disease in The Netherlands. , 2007, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[20]  I. Kiss,et al.  Modelling the initial spread of foot-and-mouth disease through animal movements , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  Daniel T. Haydon,et al.  Transmission Pathways of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus in the United Kingdom in 2007 , 2008, PLoS pathogens.

[22]  Christl A Donnelly,et al.  Assessment of the risk posed by bovine spongiform encephalopathy in cattle in Great Britain and the impact of potential changes to current control measures , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  M. Vernon,et al.  Demographics of cattle movements in the United Kingdom , 2011, BMC veterinary research.

[24]  Simon Gubbins,et al.  Assessing the risk of bluetongue to UK livestock: uncertainty and sensitivity analyses of a temperature-dependent model for the basic reproduction number , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[25]  B. Dufour,et al.  Vulnerability of animal trade networks to the spread of infectious diseases: a methodological approach applied to evaluation and emergency control strategies in cattle, France, 2005. , 2011, Transboundary and emerging diseases.

[26]  L. Danon,et al.  Individual identity and movement networks for disease metapopulations , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  J. Wilesmith,et al.  Modelling studies on bovine spongiform encephalopathy occurrence to assist in the review of the over 30 months rule in Great Britain , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  John Scott What is social network analysis , 2010 .