Binocular rivalry occurs without simultaneous presentation of rival stimuli

It has always been assumed that for binocular rivalry to occur, the dichoptic stimuli must be exposed simultaneously. However, we demonstrate binocular rivalry between rival stimuli that are never simultaneously displayed. Thissuccessive binocular rivalry is indistinguishable from normal rivalry with equal-duration alternate presentation of the rival stimuli at rates down to about 20 Hz. Rivalry is evident despite obvious flicker for presentation rates as low as 3 Hz. Rivalry also survives a dark interval of more than 100 msec, introduced between alternate brief presentations (5 msec) of the dichoptic stimuli. Simultaneous brief exposure of the rival stimuli produces an equivalent amount of rivalry, which persists for more than 300 msec. This implies that rivalry persistence involves a peripheral, monocular component and a central, binocular component, as has been shown for stereopsis.

[1]  G. Sperling.  Binocular Vision: A Physical and a Neural Theory , 1970 .

[2]  R. Fox,et al.  Binocular rivalry and reciprocal inhibition , 1969 .

[3]  Harold P. Bechtoldt,et al.  Binocular integration in line rivalry , 1978 .

[4]  A. G. Goldstein,et al.  Binocular fusion and contour suppression , 1970 .

[5]  G. R. Engel.  An Investigation of Visual Responses to Brief Stereoscopic Stimuli , 1970, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  Heinz Werner,et al.  Studies on Contour: Strobostereoscopic Phenomena , 1940 .

[7]  Charles Wheatstone,et al.  Contributions to the Physiology of Vision. , 1837 .

[8]  W. B. Pillsbury.  The Physiological Factors of the Attention Process. , 1905 .

[9]  L. Kaufman,et al.  ON THE SPREAD OF SUPPRESSION AND BINOCULAR RIVALRY. , 1963, Vision research.

[10]  P. Walker.  Binocular rivalry : Central or peripheral selective processes? , 1978 .

[11]  Marvin M. Levy,et al.  Stereopsis and binocular rivalry from dichoptic stereograms , 1978, Vision Research.

[12]  R. M. Boynton,et al.  Human binocular summation at absolute threshold. , 1974, Vision research.

[13]  T. Bower,et al.  Temporal effects in binocular vision , 1964 .

[14]  R. Williams.  The effect of strabismus on dichoptic summation of form information , 1974 .

[15]  H. Klüver.  An experimental study of the eidetic type , 1975 .

[16]  K N Ogle,et al.  Stereoscopic depth and binocular rivalry. , 1967, Vision research.

[17]  Naomi Weisstein,et al.  W-shaped and U-shaped functions obtained for monoptic and dichoptic disk-disk masking , 1971 .

[18]  Lorrin A. Riggs,et al.  Suppression of the blackout due to blinks , 1981, Vision Research.

[19]  C. Schor,et al.  Visual Stimuli for Strabismic Suppression , 1977, Perception.

[20]  M S Banks,et al.  Sensitive period for the development of human binocular vision , 1975, Science.

[21]  M. Hollins,et al.  The effect of contrast on the completeness of binocular rivalry suppression , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  Depth Perception Loss with Local Monocular Suppression: A Problem in the Explanation of Stereopsis , 1964, Science.

[23]  B G Breitmeyer,et al.  Implications of sustained and transient channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression, and information processing. , 1976, Psychological review.

[24]  R. P. O'Shea,et al.  Interocular transfer of the motion after-effect is not reduced by binocular rivalry , 1981, Vision Research.

[25]  P. G. H. Clarke,et al.  Subjective standstill caused by the interaction of moving patterns , 1977, Vision Research.

[26]  P. O. Bishop.  Neurophysiology of Binocular Single Vision and Stereopsis , 1973 .

[27]  Randolph Blake,et al.  On utrocular discrimination , 1979 .

[28]  C. Wheatstone.  XVIII. Contributions to the physiology of vision. —Part the first. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision , 1962, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[29]  D M Levi,et al.  Humans deprived of normal binocular vision have binocular interactions tuned to size and orientation. , 1979, Science.

[30]  N. Wade,et al.  The influence of colour and contour rivalry on the magnitude of the tilt after-effect , 1978, Vision Research.

[31]  The importance of collative-affective and intensive arousal potential in stereoscopically induced perceptual conflict. , 1966, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[32]  P. Dodwell.  Visual Pattern Recognition , 1970 .

[33]  John D. Mollon,et al.  On the Time Constants of Tachistoscopes* , 1978 .

[34]  K. N. Ogle.  STEREOSCOPIC DEPTH PERCEPTION AND EXPOSURE DELAY BETWEEN IMAGES TO THE TWO EYES. , 1963, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[35]  P. C. DODWELL,et al.  A Theory of Binocular Fusion , 1963, Nature.

[36]  J. Guilford.  'Fluctuations of attention' with weak visual stumuli , 1927 .

[37]  D M Levi,et al.  Binocular interactions in normal and anomalous binocular vision: effects of flicker. , 1982, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[38]  R. Blake,et al.  Further developments in binocular summation , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  J M Wolfe,et al.  Influence of Spatial Frequency, Luminance, and Duration on Binocular Rivalry and Abnormal Fusion of Briefly Presented Dichoptic Stimuli , 1983, Perception.

[40]  W. Levelt.  On binocular rivalry , 1965 .

[41]  W. Mcdougall,et al.  III.—THE PHYSIOLOGICAL FACTORS OF THE ATTENTION-PROCESS (III.) , 1903 .

[42]  S. Dawson.  THE EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF BINOCULAR COLOUR MIXTURE. I.1 , 1917 .

[43]  C. Sherrington,et al.  ON BINOCULAR FLICKER AND THE CORRELATION OF ACTIVITY OF ‘CORRESPONDING’ RETINAL POINTS , 1904 .

[44]  D M Levi,et al.  The relationship between binocular rivalry and strabismic suppression. , 1985, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[45]  Charles Wheatstone F.R.S..  XXXVI. Contributions to the physiology of vision.—Part the First. On the some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phænomena of binocular vision , 1852 .