Evaluation of Hydrogen/Oxygen release compounds for the remediation of VOCs

Problem statement: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) were widespread in groundwater of industrialized areas and in situ remediation intervents characterized by a high environmental compatibility were of main interest. The scope of this study was the evaluation of the potential of two innovative reagents (HRC and ORC from Regenesis) for the remediation of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). The reagents respectively perform reduction and oxidation mechanisms, both effective in the degradation of VOCs. Approach: Hydrogen Release Compound (HRC) and Oxygen Release Compound (ORC) were tested about the degradation of Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene and Xylene (BTEX) and some Chlorinated Aliphatic compounds (CAHs). Five series of batch tests were performed with an artificial polluted aqueous phase and some soil coming from a polluted site in which natural attenuation of VOCs occurs. Results: ORC exhibited a good efficiency in degradation of BTEX and zero order model was found as a reliable approximation of experimental data (with the exceptions of benzene and toluene, for which a first order kinetic model was trustworthy), while HRC showed a good efficiency in the degradation of CAHs and a first order model consistently estimated almost all experimental data. The experimental data were modeled by means of different mathematical equations, considering zero and first order kinetics and the results were discussed and compared. Conclusions: On the grounds of the performed tests, Oxygen Release Compound (ORC) is effective in BTEX degradation and Hydrogen Release Compound (HRC) in CAHs removal.

[1]  F. Aulenta,et al.  Relevance of side reactions in anaerobic reductive dechlorination microcosms amended with different electron donors. , 2007, Water research.

[2]  Mauro Majone,et al.  Assessment of natural or enhanced in situ bioremediation at a chlorinated solvent-contaminated aquifer in Italy: a microcosm study. , 2005, Environment international.

[3]  A. Spormann,et al.  Comparison of lactate, formate, and propionate as hydrogen donors for the reductive dehalogenation of trichloroethene in a continuous-flow column. , 2010, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[4]  A. Klute,et al.  Methods of soil analysis , 2015, American Potato Journal.

[5]  L. Semprini,et al.  In situ bioremediation of chlorinated solvents. , 1995, Environmental health perspectives.

[6]  C. H. Ward,et al.  Comparison of Bioaugmentation and Biostimulation for the Enhancement of Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Source Zone Bioremediation , 2006, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[7]  Erica Borum Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents in Fractured Bedrock: Characterization and Case Studies , 2002 .

[8]  D. Pinelli,et al.  Chloroform aerobic cometabolism by butane-utilizing bacteria in bioaugmented and non-bioaugmented soil/groundwater microcosms , 2007 .

[9]  M. McBride Environmental Chemistry of Soils , 1994 .

[10]  Awwa,et al.  Standard Methods for the examination of water and wastewater , 1999 .

[11]  F. Löffler,et al.  Coupling Aggressive Mass Removal with Microbial Reductive Dechlorination for Remediation of DNAPL Source Zones: A Review and Assessment , 2004, Environmental health perspectives.

[12]  R. Jakobsen,et al.  Effects of sulfate on anaerobic chloroethene degradation by an enriched culture under transient and steady-state hydrogen supply. , 2005, Water research.

[13]  Yanru Yang,et al.  Comparison between donor substrates for biologically enhanced tetrachloroethene DNAPL dissolution. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  F. Aulenta,et al.  Enhanced anaerobic bioremediation of chlorinated solvents: environmental factors influencing microbial activity and their relevance under field conditions , 2006 .

[15]  J. Hughes,et al.  Biologically-enhanced removal of PCE from NAPL source zones. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[16]  C. Larroche,et al.  In situ bioremediation of monoaromatic pollutants in groundwater: a review. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[17]  D. Lyon,et al.  Flux and product distribution during biological treatment of tetrachloroethene dense non-aqueous-phase liquid. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  Perry L. McCarty,et al.  Competition for Hydrogen within a Chlorinated Solvent Dehalogenating Anaerobic Mixed Culture , 1998 .

[19]  J. Ferguson,et al.  Anaerobic transformations and bioremediation of chlorinated solvents. , 2000, Environmental pollution.

[20]  F. Löffler,et al.  Experimental evaluation and mathematical modeling of microbially enhanced tetrachloroethene (PCE) dissolution. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  D. Pinelli,et al.  Long-term aerobic cometabolism of a chlorinated solvent mixture by vinyl chloride-, methane- and propane-utilizing biomasses. , 2006, Journal of Hazardous Materials.

[22]  D. A. Barry,et al.  pH control for enhanced reductive bioremediation of chlorinated solvent source zones. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[23]  Servé W. M. Kengen,et al.  Anaerobic microbial reductive dehalogenation of chlorinated ethenes , 1999 .

[24]  P. Kitanidis,et al.  Electron donor and pH relationships for biologically enhanced dissolution of chlorinated solvent DNAPL in groundwater , 2007 .

[25]  Woojin Lee,et al.  Abiotic reductive dechlorination of chlorinated ethylenes by iron-bearing phyllosilicates. , 2004, Chemosphere.