A joint measurement of efficiency and effectiveness for non-storable commodities: Integrated data envelopment analysis approaches

Efficiency and effectiveness for non-storable commodities represent two distinct dimensions and a joint measurement of both is necessary to fully capture the overall performance. This paper proposes two novel integrated data envelopment analysis (IDEA) approaches, the integrated Charnes, Cooper and Rhodes (ICCR) and integrated Banker, Charnes and Cooper (IBCC) models, to jointly analyze the overall performance of non-storable commodities under constant and variable returns to scale technologies. The core logic of the proposed models is simultaneously determining the virtual multipliers associated with inputs, outputs, and consumption by additive specifications for technical efficiency and service effectiveness terms with equal weights. We show that both ICCR and IBCC models possess the essential properties of rationality, uniqueness, and benchmarking power. A case analysis also demonstrates that the proposed novel IDEA approaches have higher benchmarking power than the conventional separate DEA approaches. More generalized specifications of IDEA models with unequal weights are also elaborated.

[1]  Ming-Miin Yu,et al.  Assessing the technical efficiency, service effectiveness, and technical effectiveness of the world's railways through NDEA analysis , 2008 .

[2]  T. Oum,et al.  ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY OF RAILWAYS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC POLICY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE OECD COUNTRIES' RAILWAYS. IN: RAILWAYS , 2002 .

[3]  Nicole Adler,et al.  Measuring airport quality from the airlines' viewpoint: an application of data envelopment analysis , 2001 .

[4]  K. Kerstens Technical efficiency measurement and explanation of French urban transit companies , 1996 .

[5]  James Odeck,et al.  Evaluating efficiency in the Norwegian bus industry using data envelopment analysis , 2001 .

[6]  Boaz Golany,et al.  Evaluation of deregulated airline networks using data envelopment analysis combined with principal component analysis with an application to Western Europe , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  F Salazar de la Cruz A DEA APPROACH TO THE AIRPORT PRODUCTION FUNCTION , 1999 .

[8]  Yu-Chiun Chiou,et al.  Route-based performance evaluation of Taiwanese domestic airlines using data envelopment analysis , 2006 .

[9]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Kevin Cullinane,et al.  The technical efficiency of container ports: Comparing data envelopment analysis and stochastic frontier analysis , 2006 .

[11]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Efficiency decomposition in network data envelopment analysis: A relational model , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Jose L. Tongzon,et al.  Efficiency measurement of selected Australian and other international ports using data envelopment analysis , 2001 .

[13]  Jonathan Cowie,et al.  Organisation form, scale effects and efficiency in the British bus industry , 1999 .

[14]  Ming-Miin Yu,et al.  Efficiency and effectiveness in railway performance using a multi-activity network DEA model , 2008 .

[15]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Robustly efficient parametric frontiers via Multiplicative DEA for domestic and international operations of the Latin American airline industry. , 1996 .

[16]  Attah K. Boame THE TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY OF CANADIAN URBAN TRANSIT SYSTEMS , 2004 .

[17]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Equivalence in two-stage DEA approaches , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Jati K. Sengupta,et al.  A dynamic efficiency model using data envelopment analysis , 1999 .

[19]  Philip A. Viton,et al.  Changes in multi-mode bus transit efficiency, 1988–1992 , 1998 .

[20]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[21]  Joseph Sarkis An analysis of the operational efficiency of major airports in the United States , 2000 .

[22]  J. Cowie,et al.  THE TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OWNERSHIP IN THE RAIL INDUSTRY. THE CASE OF SWISS PRIVATE RAILWAYS , 1999 .

[23]  Tser-yieth Chen,et al.  An assessment of technical efficiency and cross-efficiency in Taiwan's electricity distribution sector , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  The scientific wealth of European nations: Taking effectiveness into account , 1998, Scientometrics.

[25]  Hean Tat Keh,et al.  Efficiency, effectiveness and productivity of marketing in services , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  Matthew G. Karlaftis,et al.  Investigating transit production and performance: a programming approach , 2003 .

[27]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Analysis of Cost Variances for Management Control in Hospitals , 1990 .

[28]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .

[29]  Yu-Chiun Chiou,et al.  INTEGRATED DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS MODELS FOR MEASURING TRANSPORT EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS , 2007 .

[30]  Dušan Teodorović,et al.  Performance evaluation of bus routes: A provider and passenger perspective , 2007 .

[31]  Massimiliano Piacenza,et al.  Regulatory and environmental effects on public transit efficiency: a mixed DEA-SFA approach , 2007 .

[32]  James Nolan,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF PRODUCTIVE EFFICIENCY IN URBAN TRANSIT , 1996 .

[33]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[34]  Juan Carlos Martín,et al.  An application of DEA to measure the efficiency of Spanish airports prior to privatization , 2001 .

[35]  Matthew G. Karlaftis,et al.  A DEA approach for evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of urban transit systems , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[36]  J. Nolan,et al.  Identifying and measuring public policy goals: ISTEA and the US bus transit industry , 2002 .

[37]  Lawrence W. Lan,et al.  TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY AND SERVICE EFFECTIVENESS FOR RAILWAYS INDUSTRY: DEA APPROACHES , 2003 .

[38]  M. Schefczyk Operational performance of airlines: An extension of traditional measurement paradigms , 1993 .