An Analysis of the Effect of Multiple Layers in the Multi-Objective Design of Conducting Polymer Composites

In the design of materials for the shielding of electric devices, there is a recent trend to use multilayer compounds due to some restrictions in the making process of the materials but also since they are supposed to have a higher potential to offer “better” characteristics than the related monolayered materials. In this work, we investigate the possible impact of the number of layers in a compound critically. It will turn out that—at least for the general objectives we study here and for conducting polymer composites—multilayered materials are suitable to only a limited extent. To be more precise, when “just” aiming for a high shielding efficiency the task can be accomplished with merely one layer. If in addition the cost of the material comes into play, however, a second layer may be helpful, but further layers do not seem to have a significant impact on the performance of a material. Here we extend an existing multiobjective design problem for the design of shielding materials for our purpose, and attack the resulting multiobjective optimization problem with evolutionary strategies, and finally analyze the results in the viewpoint of the required number of layers within a shielding material.

[1]  Eckart Zitzler,et al.  Indicator-Based Selection in Multiobjective Search , 2004, PPSN.

[2]  M. Hansen,et al.  Evaluating the quality of approximations to the non-dominated set , 1998 .

[3]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach , 1999, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[4]  D. Chung Electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of carbon materials , 2001 .

[5]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  A Tutorial on the Performance Assessment of Stochastic Multiobjective Optimizers , 2006 .

[6]  ZitzlerE.,et al.  Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms , 1999 .

[7]  R. K. Ursem Multi-objective Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms , 2009 .

[8]  El-Ghazali Talbi,et al.  New analysis of the optimization of electromagnetic shielding properties using conducting polymers and a multi‐objective approach , 2008 .

[9]  D. C. Trivedi,et al.  Freestanding conducting polyaniline film for the control of electromagnetic radiations , 2005 .

[10]  Krishna Naishadham,et al.  Shielding effectiveness of conductive polymers , 1992 .

[11]  El-Ghazali Talbi,et al.  ParadisEO-MOEO: A Framework for Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization , 2007, EMO.

[12]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A Fast Elitist Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm for Multi-objective Optimisation: NSGA-II , 2000, PPSN.

[13]  Marco Laumanns,et al.  PISA: A Platform and Programming Language Independent Interface for Search Algorithms , 2003, EMO.

[14]  Jean-Luc Wojkiewicz,et al.  Lightweight electromagnetic shields using optimized polyaniline composites in the microwave band , 2007 .

[15]  Gary B. Lamont,et al.  Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems , 2002, Genetic Algorithms and Evolutionary Computation.

[16]  K. Naishadham,et al.  Broadband microwave absorption and shielding properties of a poly(aniline) , 1999 .

[17]  K. Wu,et al.  Synthesis and microwave electromagnetic characteristics of bamboo charcoal/polyaniline composites in 2–40 GHz , 2008 .

[18]  Bernhard Keiser,et al.  Principles of electromagnetic compatibility , 1983 .

[19]  Vijaya Puri,et al.  Microwave absorption and permittivity of polyaniline thin films using overlay technique , 2008, Microelectron. J..

[20]  Marco Laumanns,et al.  Performance assessment of multiobjective optimizers: an analysis and review , 2003, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[21]  M. C. Rezende,et al.  Microwave Absorbing Coatings Based on a Blend of Nitrile Rubber, EPDM Rubber and Polyaniline , 2005 .