An XML Adoption Framework for Electronic Business

One of the recent phenomena information systems (IS) practitioners are currently facing in their continuous process of adopting new technology is the utilization of Extensible Markup Language (XML). In this paper we propose an XML adoption framework, a corresponding adoption space model, and a probit model of technology diffusion to examine the decision of adopting XML-based applications in the context of electronic business. First, an XML adoption framework is proposed. The framework helps companies examine their current status in the electronic business environment from the perspective of three electronic business domains, namely enterprise intranets, value-chain extranets, and the global Internet. This framework also provides guidelines for companies seeking to understand the potential benefits of adopting XML technology, and then further suggests the appropriate path and proper applications. Second, we propose an XML adoption space model. Considering its current status of IT applications, a company can utilize this model to measure the efforts/costs that will be incurred by developing XML-enabled IT applications. Third, we use a probit model of technology diffusion to explore the feasibility of a company's adoption of XML technology. This probit model considers a company's specific characteristics and evaluates benefits and efforts/costs of its XML adoption decision.

[1]  Paul Ati ' Ewell TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION AND ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING: THE CASE OF BUSINESS COMPUTING* , 1992 .

[2]  Judy Chuan-Chuan Lin,et al.  Towards an understanding of the behavioural intention to use a web site , 2000, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[3]  Varun Grover,et al.  Information technology innovations: general diffusion patterns and its relationships to innovation characteristics , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[4]  S. Davies The Diffusion of Process Innovations , 1979 .

[5]  M. Picavet,et al.  Framework for managing intranet-based applications , 1999, 1999 7th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation. Proceedings ETFA '99 (Cat. No.99TH8467).

[6]  M. G. Aboelmaged,et al.  Researching information technology adoption process in higher education institutions: a rational for applying individual-based models , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology. ICMIT 2000. 'Management in the 21st Century' (Cat. No.00EX457).

[7]  Stanley Zarowin,et al.  Finally, Business Talks the Same Language , 2000 .

[8]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  Information rules - a strategic guide to the network economy , 1999 .

[9]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[10]  W. Dugger The Economic Institutions of Capitalism , 1987 .

[11]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web , 2000, Decis. Support Syst..

[12]  James Tauber Digital Toolbox: XML After 1.0: You Ain't Seen Nothin' Yet , 1999, IEEE Internet Comput..

[13]  James C. Wetherbe,et al.  The Adoption of Spreadsheet Software: Testing Innovation Diffusion Theory in the Context of End-User Computing , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[14]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[15]  Ann Rockley Designing an effective intranet/extranet , 1998, IPCC 98. Contemporary Renaissance: Changing the Way we Communicate. Proceedings 1998 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (Cat. No.98CH36332).

[16]  Shanthi Gopalakrishnan,et al.  The impact of organizational context on innovation adoption in commercial banks , 2000, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[17]  E. Pentecost,et al.  The Determinants of Technology Diffusion: Evidence from the UK Financial Sector , 2002 .

[18]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[19]  James J. Jiang,et al.  E‐commerce user behavior model: an empirical study , 2000 .

[20]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies , 1987, CACM.

[21]  Robert G. Fichman,et al.  International Conference on Information Systems ( ICIS ) 1992 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION : A REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH , 2017 .

[22]  Joan S. Ash,et al.  Organizational factors that influence information technology diffusion in academic health sciences centers. , 1997, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[23]  Christos H. Skiadas,et al.  Two generalized rational models for forecasting innovation diffusion , 1985 .

[24]  V. Lai,et al.  An assessment of the influence of organizational characteristics on information technology adoption decision: a discriminative approach , 1997 .

[25]  Shihyu Chou,et al.  An empirical study of XML/EDI , 2001, J. Syst. Softw..

[26]  C. Hempel Philosophy of Natural Science , 1966 .

[27]  M. Wollschlaeger Planning, configuration and management of industrial communication networks using Internet technology , 1998, IEEE GLOBECOM 1998 (Cat. NO. 98CH36250).

[28]  AttewellPaul Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning , 1992 .

[29]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[30]  Joan V. Robinson,et al.  The Nature of the Firm , 2004 .

[31]  P. Attewell Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing , 1992 .

[32]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs , 1999, MIS Q..

[33]  K. Klein,et al.  The Challenge of Innovation Implementation , 1996 .

[34]  E. Mansfield TECHNICAL CHANGE AND THE RATE OF IMITATION , 1961 .

[35]  Richard Vidgen,et al.  XML: what is it good for? , 2000 .

[36]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Post-Adoption Behavior in the Context of Online Services , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[37]  Frank M. Bass,et al.  A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables , 2004, Manag. Sci..