Tool life and tool wear in taper turning of a nickel-based superalloy

Due to their high ductility and strain hardening coefficient, high mechanical strength and hardness even in high temperatures, chemical affinity with almost every tool material, and low thermal conductivity, nickel-based superalloys are known to present very low machinability. Some researchers point out that taper turning may prolong tool life as ramping may distribute tool wear along tool edge, avoiding the presence of notch wear in the end of the depth of cut, which usually occurs in the tools used in turning of these alloys. In this work, tool life, tool wear, and resulting surface roughness of Inconel 625 were evaluated for taper turning in comparison with straight turning. In taper turning, double feed was tested to compensate metal removal rate reduction (since in this operation, the feed length is doubled), and in order to avoid roughness increase caused by the higher feed, a wiper tool was used. Results show that taper turning was not successful in terms of tool life, although the furrowing mechanism of the tool coating caused by the hard burr formed, that leads to notch wear, was avoided. This mechanism was replaced by strong adhesion that promoted rapid and wide flank wear. Feed increase has also produced microchipping due to the extra load on the tool edge. Although wiper tool had provided better finishing when high feed was employed, conventional tool seems to be more suitable for tapering considering tool life.

[1]  T. Obikawa,et al.  High speed MQL finish-turning of Inconel 718 with different coated tools , 2007 .

[2]  Steven J. Skerlos,et al.  Rough turning Inconel 750 with supercritical CO2-based minimum quantity lubrication , 2014 .

[3]  F. Sun,et al.  Study of surface quality in machining nickel-based alloy Inconel 718 , 2013 .

[4]  María Henar Miguélez,et al.  Analysis of tool wear patterns in finishing turning of Inconel 718 , 2013 .

[5]  E. Ezugwu Key improvements in the machining of difficult-to-cut aerospace superalloys , 2005 .

[6]  Keith Ridgway,et al.  Surface integrity and tool life when turning Inconel 718 using ultra-high pressure and flood coolant systems , 2008 .

[7]  D. Ulutan,et al.  Machining induced surface integrity in titanium and nickel alloys: A review , 2011 .

[8]  Gao Dong,et al.  Study of cutting deformation in machining nickel-based alloy Inconel 718 , 2011 .

[9]  Dirk Biermann,et al.  Burr Minimization Strategies in Machining Operations , 2010 .

[10]  Jieqiong Lin,et al.  Wear characteristics and wear control method of PVD-coated carbide tool in turning Inconel 718 , 2015 .

[11]  J. Paulo Davim,et al.  A note on the use of the minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) system in turning , 2015 .

[12]  Luca Settineri,et al.  Properties and performances of innovative coated tools for turning inconel , 2008 .

[13]  F. Klocke Manufacturing Processes 1 , 2011 .

[14]  D. Gao,et al.  New observations on tool wear mechanism in dry machining Inconel718 , 2011 .

[15]  Dahu Zhu,et al.  Tool wear characteristics in machining of nickel-based superalloys , 2013 .

[16]  I. S. Jawahir,et al.  Analysis of residual stresses induced by dry turning of difficult-to-machine materials , 2008 .

[17]  Kejia Zhuang,et al.  Notch wear prediction model in turning of Inconel 718 with ceramic tools considering the influence of work hardened layer , 2014 .

[18]  K. Maity,et al.  Effect of cutting speed and CVD multilayer coating on machinability of Inconel 825 , 2014 .

[19]  Helmi Attia,et al.  Wear mechanisms of WC coated and uncoated tools in finish turning of Inconel 718 , 2010 .

[20]  E. Trent Chapter 5 – Heat in metal cutting , 2000 .