A shockable rhythm detection algorithm for automatic external defibrillators by combining a slope variability analyzer with a band-pass digital filter

To make automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) easy to use by the public who is not familiar with emergency treatment and electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis, it is critical to have an accurate shockable rhythm recognition algorithm. This paper presents a novel compositive algorithm by combining a slope variability analyzer with a band-pass digital filter so as to accurately distinguish shockable rhythms from non-shockable rhythms for automatic external defibrillators (AEDs). A total of 35 ECG records from the widely recognized Creighton University Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia Database (CUDB) were used to test the performance of the proposed algorithm. The obtained sensitivity of 94.2% and the specificity of 96.6% both satisfy requirements by the AHA rules on the arrhythmias detection for AEDs, and show a higher performance comparing with the previous HILB algorithm and the slope variability method only. As a conclusion, the proposed compositive algorithm would potentially provide a useful tool for AED systems with a higher accuracy and lower computation requirements.

[1]  D. Ge,et al.  Cardiac arrhythmia classification using autoregressive modeling , 2002, Biomedical engineering online.

[2]  R. Markert,et al.  In‐Hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Survival in 1 Hospital and Literature Review , 1995, Medicine.

[3]  H. Nakajima,et al.  Real-time discrimination of ventricular tachyarrhythmia with Fourier-transform neural network , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  A. Amann,et al.  A new ventricular fibrillation detection algorithm for automated external defibrillators , 2005, Computers in Cardiology, 2005.

[5]  Philip J Podrid,et al.  Epidemiology and stratification of risk for sudden cardiac death , 2005, Clinical cardiology.

[6]  Richard E. Kerber,et al.  Automatic External Defibrillators for Public Access Defibrillation: Recommendations for Specifying and Reporting Arrhythmia Analysis Algorithm Performance, Incorporating New Waveforms, and Enhancing Safety , 1997, Biomedical instrumentation & technology.

[7]  Thomas Mattioni,et al.  Performance of an automatic external cardioverter-defibrillator algorithm in the discrimination of supraventricular from ventricular tachycardia. , 2003, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  Jean G. Lemire,et al.  Is Cardiac Resuscitation Worthwhile , 1972 .

[9]  A. Schneider,et al.  In-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A 30-Year Review , 1993, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[10]  A. Johnson,et al.  Is cardiac resuscitation worthwhile? A decade of experience. , 1973, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  J P Ornato,et al.  Automatic external defibrillators for public access defibrillation: recommendations for specifying and reporting arrhythmia analysis algorithm performance, incorporating new waveforms, and enhancing safety. A statement for health professionals from the American Heart Association Task Force on Automa , 1997, Circulation.

[12]  N. Thakor,et al.  Ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation detection by a sequential hypothesis testing algorithm , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  A Murray,et al.  Changes in the surface electrocardiogram during the onset of spontaneous ventricular fibrillation in man. , 1994, European heart journal.

[14]  Irena Jekova,et al.  Real time detection of ventricular fibrillation and tachycardia. , 2004, Physiological measurement.