Counterfactual Thinking as a Mechanism in Narrative Persuasion

Two experiments examined the impact of counterfactual thinking on persuasion. Participants in both experiments were exposed to short video clips in which an actor described a car accident that resulted in serious injury. In the narrative description, the salience of a counterfactual was manipulated by either explicitly including the counterfactual in the narrative or by not including it. An examination of attitudes related to traffic safety supported the hypothesis that the inclusion of a counterfactual in narrative enhances the persuasive impact of the narrative. The first study (N= 50) demonstrated this effect in the short-term, and the second study (N= 61) replicated the short-term effects while also demonstrating the temporal persistence of the initial changes in attitudes. Both studies highlighted potential limiting conditions of these effects. The first study showed that the impact of counterfactuals on persuasion is most potent when the self, rather than another person, is the focus of blame in the counterfactual. The second study revealed that attitude changes persist over time when the counterfactuals are self-generated, but not when they are spoon-fed to the participant. Results are discussed in the context of understanding the characteristics of counterfactual thoughts that enable them to enhance the persuasive impact of narrative.

[1]  G. Wells,et al.  The undoing of scenarios. , 1987 .

[2]  B. Weiner.  A Cognitive (Attribution)-Emotion-Action Model of Motivated Behavior: An Analysis of Judgments of Help-Giving. , 1980 .

[3]  D. Kincaid,et al.  Mass media family planning promotion in three Nigerian cities. , 1990, Studies in family planning.

[4]  L. Sanna,et al.  Antecedents to Spontaneous Counterfactual Thinking: Effects of Expectancy Violation and Outcome Valence , 1996 .

[5]  Frances M. Ainslie,et al.  Self-Relevant Scenarios as an Indirect Means of Attitude Change , 1985 .

[6]  Michael Ross,et al.  Bolstering Attitudes by Autobiographical Recall , 1988, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[7]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches , 1981 .

[8]  J. van der Pligt,et al.  Anticipated Affect and Behavioral Choice , 1996 .

[9]  A. Ortony,et al.  What's basic about basic emotions? , 1990, Psychological review.

[10]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives , 1986 .

[11]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Self-Relevant Scenarios as Mediators of Likelihood Estimates and Compliance: Does Imagining Make It So? , 1982 .

[12]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[13]  Timothy C. Brock,et al.  Fictional narratives change beliefs: Replications of Prentice, Gerrig, and Bailis (1997) with mixed corroboration , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  Chester A. Insko,et al.  Facilitative and Inhibiting Effects of Distraction on Attitude Change , 1974 .

[15]  K. L. Marsh,et al.  Gaining Control through Counterfactual Thinking , 1999 .

[16]  D. Armor,et al.  The influence of anticipated counterfactual regret on behavior. , 2000 .

[17]  Irving L. Janis,et al.  Comparison of the Effectiveness of Improvised Versus Non-Improvised Role-Playing in Producing Opinion Changes , 1956 .

[18]  G. Wells,et al.  Mental Simulation of Causality , 1989 .

[19]  R. Sugden,et al.  Regret Theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty Review of Economic Studies , 1982 .

[20]  M. Allen,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Fear Appeals: Implications for Effective Public Health Campaigns , 2000, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[21]  Thane S. Pittman,et al.  Inaction Inertia: Foregoing Future Benefits as a Result of an Initial Failure to Act , 1995 .

[22]  Timothy C. Brock,et al.  The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  M. Zeelenberg,et al.  Consequences of regret aversion: 2. Additional evidence for effects of feedback on decision making , 1997 .

[24]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[25]  N. Roese.  The Functional Basis of Counterfactual Thinking , 1994 .

[26]  K. Markman,et al.  The Impact of Perceived Control on the Imagination of Better and Worse Possible Worlds , 1995 .

[27]  H. Rao Unnava,et al.  Self-Referencing , 1989 .

[28]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Cognitive Responses to Persuasion as Mediators of Opinion Change , 1978 .

[29]  Richard J. Gerrig,et al.  What readers bring to the processing of fictional texts , 1997 .

[30]  Richard J. Gerrig,et al.  Experiencing Narrative Worlds: On the Psychological Activities of Reading , 1993 .

[31]  Joohn C. Reinard.  The Empirical Study of the Persuasive Effects of Evidence The Status After Fifty Years of Research , 1988 .

[32]  Bobby J. Calder,et al.  The Relation of Cognitive and Memorial Processes to Persuasion in a Simulated Jury Trial , 1974 .

[33]  A. Tversky,et al.  The simulation heuristic , 1982 .

[34]  Steven J. Sherman,et al.  The Role of Counterfactual Thinking in Judgments of Affect , 1990 .

[35]  Timothy C. Brock,et al.  Communication discrepancy and intent to persuade as determinants of counterargument production , 1967 .

[36]  W. Fisher.  Human Communication As Narration: Toward a Philosophy of Reason, Value and Action , 1987 .

[37]  M. Zeelenberg,et al.  Consequences of Regret Aversion: Effects of Expected Feedback on Risky Decision Making , 1996 .

[38]  Antony Stephen Reid Manstead,et al.  The moderating role of self-efficacy beliefs in the relationship between anticipated feelings of regret and condom use , 1997 .

[39]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Counterfactual Thinking and Victim Compensation , 1986 .

[40]  J van der Pligt,et al.  Anticipated affective reactions and prevention of AIDS. , 1995, The British journal of social psychology.

[41]  James M. Olson,et al.  Outcome Controllability and Counterfactual Thinking , 1995 .

[42]  Joop van der Pligt,et al.  Anticipated regret and time perspective: Changing sexual risk-taking behavior. , 1996 .

[43]  David E. Bell,et al.  Regret in Decision Making under Uncertainty , 1982, Oper. Res..

[44]  J. Landman.  Regret and Elation Following Action and Inaction , 1987 .

[45]  P. Salovey,et al.  Message Framing in the Prevention and Early Detection of Illness , 2002 .