Author(s): Therkelsen, Peter; Rao, Prakash; McKane, Aimee; Sabouni, Ridah; Sheihing, Paul | Abstract: The U.S. DOE Superior Energy Performance (SEP) program provides recognition to industrial and commercial facilities that achieve certification to the ISO 50001 energy management system standard and third party verification of energy performance improvements. Over 50 industrial facilities are participating and 28 facilities have been certified in the SEP program. These facilities find value in the robust, data driven energy performance improvement result that the SEP program delivers. Previous analysis of SEP certified facility data demonstrated the cost effectiveness of SEP and identified internal staff time to be the largest cost component related to SEP implementation and certification. This paper analyzes previously reported and newly collected data of costs and benefits associated with the implementation of an ISO 50001 and SEP certification. By disaggregating “sunk energy management system (EnMS) labor costs”, this analysis results in a more accurate and detailed understanding of the costs and benefits of SEP participation. SEP is shown to significantly improve and sustain energy performance and energy cost savings, resulting in a highly attractive return on investment. To illustrate these results, a payback function has been developed and is presented. On average facilities with annual energy spend greater than $2M can expect to implement SEP with a payback of less than 1.5 years. Finally, this paper also observes and details decreasing facility costs associated with implementing ISO 50001 and certifying to the SEP program, as the program has improved from pilot, to demonstration, to full launch.
[1]
Wolfgang Eichhammer.
Industrial Energy Efficiency
,
2004
.
[2]
Robert Williams,et al.
Certifying Industrial Energy Efficiency Performance: AligningManagement, Measurement, and Practice to Create Market Value
,
2007
.
[3]
Vanja M. Šušteršič,et al.
Review of existing energy management standards and possibilities for its introduction in Serbia
,
2010
.
[4]
A. Mckane,et al.
Thinking Globally: How ISO 50001 - Energy Management Can Make Industrial Energy Efficiency Standard Practice
,
2010
.
[5]
Peter Therkelsen,et al.
Assessing the Costs and Benefits of the Superior Energy Performance Program
,
2013
.
[6]
Aimee McKane,et al.
Implementation and rejection of industrial steam system energy efficiency measures
,
2013
.
[7]
Sandy Glatt,et al.
The Business Value of Superior Energy Performance
,
2015
.
[8]
Numan M. Durakbasa,et al.
Evaluation of corporate energy management practices of energy intensive industries in Turkey
,
2012
.
[9]
E. Lawrence.
Energy Efficiency Improvement and Cost Saving Opportunities for the Vehicle Assembly Industry An ENERGY STAR ® Guide for Energy and Plant Managers
,
2003
.
[10]
Neil Brown,et al.
An advanced energy management framework to promote energy awareness
,
2013
.