A real-time adaptive signal control in a connected vehicle environment

The state of the practice traffic signal control strategies mainly rely on infrastructure based vehicle detector data as the input for the control logic. The infrastructure based detectors are generally point detectors which cannot directly provide measurement of vehicle location and speed. With the advances in wireless communication technology, vehicles are able to communicate with each other and with the infrastructure in the emerging connected vehicle system. Data collected from connected vehicles provides a much more complete picture of the traffic states near an intersection and can be utilized for signal control. This paper presents a real-time adaptive signal phase allocation algorithm using connected vehicle data. The proposed algorithm optimizes the phase sequence and duration by solving a two-level optimization problem. Two objective functions are considered: minimization of total vehicle delay and minimization of queue length. Due to the low penetration rate of the connected vehicles, an algorithm that estimates the states of unequipped vehicle based on connected vehicle data is developed to construct a complete arrival table for the phase allocation algorithm. A real-world intersection is modeled in VISSIM to validate the algorithms. Results with a variety of connected vehicle market penetration rates and demand levels are compared to well-tuned fully actuated control. In general, the proposed control algorithm outperforms actuated control by reducing total delay by as much as 16.33% in a high penetration rate case and similar delay in a low penetration rate case. Different objective functions result in different behaviors of signal timing. The minimization of total vehicle delay usually generates lower total vehicle delay, while minimization of queue length serves all phases in a more balanced way.

[1]  Ilsoo Yun,et al.  Cumulative Travel-Time Responsive Real-Time Intersection Control Algorithm in the Connected Vehicle Environment , 2013 .

[2]  Christian Priemer,et al.  A decentralized adaptive traffic signal control using V2I communication data , 2009, 2009 12th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[3]  Byungkyu Brian Park,et al.  Development and Evaluation of a Cooperative Vehicle Intersection Control Algorithm Under the Connected Vehicles Environment , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[4]  Nathan H. Gartner,et al.  OPAC: A DEMAND-RESPONSIVE STRATEGY FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROL , 1983 .

[5]  A Carter,et al.  SCOOT: THE WORLD'S FOREMOST ADAPTIVE TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEM , 1995 .

[6]  A.G. Sims,et al.  The Sydney coordinated adaptive traffic (SCAT) system philosophy and benefits , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[7]  Jun Ding,et al.  Multi-modal traffic signal control with priority, signal actuation and coordination , 2014 .

[8]  Byungkyu Park,et al.  Traffic Signal Control with Connected Vehicles , 2013 .

[9]  Pitu B. Mirchandani,et al.  A REAL-TIME TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROL SYSTEM: ARCHITECTURE, ALGORITHMS, AND ANALYSIS , 2001 .

[10]  Jun Ding,et al.  PAMSCOD: Platoon-based arterial multi-modal signal control with online data , 2011 .

[11]  G S Greer,et al.  TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS CENTER , 1992 .

[12]  Faisal Saleem,et al.  Performance Assessment of Multi-Modal Traffic System Using Micro- , 2014 .

[13]  Jun Wang,et al.  Normal Deceleration Behavior of Passenger Vehicles at Stop Sign-Controlled Intersections Evaluated with In-Vehicle Global Positioning System Data , 2005 .

[14]  Suvrajeet Sen,et al.  Controlled Optimization of Phases at an Intersection , 1997, Transp. Sci..

[15]  Darcy M. Bullock,et al.  ACS-Lite Algorithmic Architecture: Applying Adaptive Control System Technology to Closed-Loop Traffic Signal Control Systems , 2003 .

[16]  Werner Brilon,et al.  Experiences with Adaptive Signal Control in Germany , 2013 .

[17]  Peter Stone,et al.  Automated Intersection Control , 2011 .

[18]  R D Henry Signal Timing on a Shoestring , 2005 .