Short Article: Lexically Guided Retuning of Letter Perception

Participants made visual lexical decisions to upper-case words and nonwords, and then categorized an ambiguous N–H letter continuum. The lexical decision phase included different exposure conditions: Some participants saw an ambiguous letter “?”, midway between N and H, in N-biased lexical contexts (e.g., REIG?), plus words with unambiguous H (e.g., WEIGH); others saw the reverse (e.g., WEIG?, REIGN). The first group categorized more of the test continuum as N than did the second group. Control groups, who saw “?” in nonword contexts (e.g., SMIG?), plus either of the unambiguous word sets (e.g., WEIGH or REIGN), showed no such subsequent effects. Perceptual learning about ambiguous letters therefore appears to be based on lexical knowledge, just as in an analogous speech experiment (Norris, McQueen, & Cutler, 2003) which showed similar lexical influence in learning about ambiguous phonemes. We argue that lexically guided learning is an efficient general strategy available for exploitation by different specific perceptual tasks.

[1]  D W Massaro,et al.  Letter information and orthographic context in word perception. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  The visual categories for letters and words reside outside any informationally encapsulated perceptual system , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[3]  A. Samuel,et al.  Generalization in perceptual learning for speech , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  J. McQueen,et al.  Perceptual learning in speech: Stability over time (L) , 2006 .

[5]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Phonological Abstraction in the Mental Lexicon , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[6]  Kenneth I Forster,et al.  DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[7]  J. McQueen,et al.  Perceptual learning in speech: stability over time. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  A. Samuel Red herring detectors and speech perception: In defense of selective adaptation , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  P. Coignet On specificity , 2003 .

[11]  P. D. Eimas,et al.  Selective adaptation of linguistic feature detectors , 1973 .

[12]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1.: an account of basic findings , 1988 .

[13]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[14]  J. McQueen,et al.  The specificity of perceptual learning in speech processing , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  A. Samuel,et al.  Perceptual learning for speech: Is there a return to normal? , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.