Flow, Fun and Frame in the Classroom: Redefining the Engagement and Self-Determination of Students with Intellectual Disability through Games

The purpose of special education for students with intellectual disability is not only to introduce and improve academic skills but mainly to enhance the quality of the children's life and promote their autonomy and self-determination. Games have been used in special education classrooms as tools of gratification and extrinsic motivation. Contemporary game theorists have gone further to suggest that there is a mapping between the model of learning motivation and the experience of playing digital games. However the question remains: What happens in an educational setting when games are introduced, are digital games able to become an agent of change, enhance self-determination and the willpower to learn for students with intellectual disability? In order to address these questions, we ran a three years old qualitative study with students with mild and moderate intellectual disability and their educators, using games in different educational settings. Different games and different empirical tools such as interviews, focus groups, videos and systematic observation were used, in order to gather information and document possible changes in the experience of the students as well as changes in their self-determination, engagement and motivation. Data were analysed using Analytic Induction and Erving Goffman's Frame Analysis as a tool of experiential analysis.

[1]  E. Goffman Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience , 1974 .

[2]  Shaaron E. Ainsworth,et al.  Endogenous fantasy and learning in digital games , 2015 .

[3]  Thomas Connolly,et al.  Games-Based Learning Advancements for Multi-Sensory Human Computer Interfaces: Techniques and Effective Practices , 2009 .

[4]  E. Deci,et al.  Supporting Autonomy to Motivate Patients With Diabetes for Glucose Control , 1998, Diabetes Care.

[5]  H. Marsh,et al.  Causal ordering of physical self-concept and exercise behavior: reciprocal effects model and the influence of physical education teachers. , 2006, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[6]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  Toward a Theory of Intrinsically Motivating Instruction , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[7]  Herre van Oostendorp,et al.  Current Practices in Serious Game Research: A Review from a Learning Outcomes Perspective , 2009 .

[8]  Fred M. Newmann,et al.  Continuing the bifurcation of affect and cognition , 1996 .

[9]  E. Deci,et al.  Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students: a test of self-determination theory. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  Martyn Hammersley,et al.  What is Analytic Induction , 2012 .

[11]  I. Agaliotis,et al.  Profiles of self-concept, goal orientation, and self-regulation in students with physical, intellectual, and multiple disabilities: Implications for instructional support. , 2011, Research in developmental disabilities.

[12]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[13]  Michael L. Wehmeyer,et al.  Self-Determination and Individuals with Significant Disabilities: Examining Meanings and Misinterpretations , 1998 .

[14]  Phillip C. Schlechty Shaking Up the School House: How To Support and Sustain Educational Innovation. The Jossey-Bass Education Series. , 2001 .

[15]  M. Cuskelly,et al.  A longitudinal study of motivation and competence in children with Down syndrome: early childhood to early adolescence. , 2009, Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR.

[16]  E. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Versus Extrinsic Goal Contents in Self-Determination Theory: Another Look at the Quality of Academic Motivation , 2006 .

[17]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[18]  Sebastian Deterding,et al.  The Game Frame: Systemizing a Goffmanian Approach to Video Game Theory [Extended Abstract] , 2009, DiGRA Conference.

[19]  Nicole Fruehauf Flow The Psychology Of Optimal Experience , 2016 .

[20]  E. Kunnen,et al.  Differences in problems of motivation in different special groups. , 1999, Child: care, health and development.

[21]  D. Gouscos,et al.  Digital Games-Based Learning for Students with Intellectual Disability , 2009 .

[22]  Jan-Paul van Staalduinen,et al.  A First Step towards Integrating Educational Theory and Game Design , 2011 .

[23]  Robert M. Entman,et al.  Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm , 1993 .