Growing in circles: rearing environment alters spatial navigation in fish.

Animals of many species use the geometric shape of an enclosed rectangular environment to reorient, even in the presence of a more informative featural cue. Manipulating the rearing environment affects performance on spatial tasks, but its effect on the use of geometric versus featural navigational cues is unknown. Our study varied the geometric information available in the rearing environment (circular vs. rectangular rearing tanks) of convict cichlids (Archocentrus nigrofasciatus) and tested their use of navigational cues. All the fish used geometric information to navigate when no features were present. When features were present, the fish used geometric and featural information separately. If cues were in conflict, fish raised in a circular tank showed significantly less use of geometric information than fish raised in a rectangular tank. Thus, the ability to use geometry to navigate does not require exposure to angular geometric cues during rearing, though rearing environment affects the dominance of featural and geometric cues.

[1]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Modularity as a fish (Xenotoca eiseni) views it: conjoining geometric and nongeometric information for spatial reorientation. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[2]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Separate Geometric and Non-Geometric Modules for Spatial Reorientation: Evidence from a Lopsided Animal Brain , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  K. Cheng A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation , 1986, Cognition.

[4]  H. Würbel,et al.  Dissociable effects of isolation rearing and environmental enrichment on exploration, spatial learning and HPA activity in adult rats , 2002, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[5]  C. Gallistel The organization of learning , 1990 .

[6]  Laurie L Bloomfield,et al.  Spatial encoding in mountain chickadees: features overshadow geometry , 2005, Biology Letters.

[7]  E. Spelke,et al.  Modularity and development: the case of spatial reorientation , 1996, Cognition.

[8]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Reorientation by geometric and landmark information in environments of different size. , 2005, Developmental science.

[9]  N. Newcombe,et al.  Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? squaring theory and evidence , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Modularity and spatial reorientation in a simple mind: encoding of geometric and nongeometric properties of a spatial environment by fish , 2002, Cognition.

[11]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Is there an innate geometric module? Effects of experience with angular geometric cues on spatial re-orientation based on the shape of the environment , 2007, Animal Cognition.

[12]  Debbie M. Kelly,et al.  Pigeons' (Columba livia) encoding of geometric and featural properties of a spatial environment. , 1998 .

[13]  P. Kalivas,et al.  Impoverished Rearing Environment Alters Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Expression and Function in the Prefrontal Cortex , 2004, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[14]  Lynn Nadel,et al.  Children's Use of Landmarks: Implications for Modularity Theory , 2002, Psychological science.

[15]  C Thinus-Blanc,et al.  Rhesus monkeys use geometric and nongeometric information during a reorientation task. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[16]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  How fish do geometry in large and in small spaces , 2006, Animal Cognition.