Instructional Efficiency of the Integration of Graphing Calculators in Teaching and Learning Mathematics.

This quasi-experimental study with non-equivalent control group post-test only design was conducted to investigate the effects of using graphing calculators in mathematics teaching and learning on Form Four Malaysian secondary school students’ performance and their meta-cognitive awareness level. Graphing calculator strategy refers to the use of TI-83 Plus graphing calculator in teaching and learning of Straight Lines topic. The experimental group underwent learning using graphing calculator while the control group underwent learning using conventional instruction. Three instruments were used in this study namely, Straight Lines Achievement Test, Paas Mental Effort Rating Scale and Metacognitive Awareness Survey. The data were analysed using independent t-test and planned comparison test. The findings indicated that the graphing calculators’ instruction enhanced students’ performance and induced higher levels of metacognitive awareness among students. Less mental effort were invested during the learning and test phases and hence increased 3-dimensional instructional efficiency index in learning of Straight Lines topic. Hence it can be implied that integrating the use of graphing calculators in teaching and learning of mathematics was more efficient than the conventional instruction strategy. Even though some students experience difficulties in using graphing calculators initially during learning, they responded overwhelmingly that graphing calculators improves their understanding of the Straight Lines topic. Hence, the usage of the graphing calculator lends as an effective strategy in teaching and learning of mathematics.

[1]  G. Bull,et al.  Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education , 2009 .

[2]  R. Mayer,et al.  Aids to computer-based multimedia learning , 2002 .

[3]  Frances R. Curcio,et al.  Learning mathematics for a new century : 2000 yearbook , 2000 .

[4]  Franklin Demana,et al.  Calculators in Mathematics Teaching and Learning: Past, Present, and Future. Part 2: Technology and the Mathematics Classroom. , 2000 .

[5]  J. Sweller.  COGNITIVE LOAD THEORY, LEARNING DIFFICULTY, AND INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN , 1994 .

[6]  R. A. Tarmizi,et al.  Guidance during Mathematical Problem Solving. , 1988 .

[7]  William H. Leonard,et al.  The Graphing Calculator as an Aid to Teaching Algebra. , 2004 .

[8]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments , 2003 .

[9]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load Theory , 2003 .

[10]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[11]  J. Sweller.  Instructional Design Consequences of an Analogy between Evolution by Natural Selection and Human Cognitive Architecture , 2004 .

[12]  D. S. Moore,et al.  Mathematics, statistics, and teaching , 1997 .

[13]  Mike Thomas,et al.  Building a versatile understanding of algebraic variables with a graphic calculator , 2000 .

[14]  C. Hirsch.  Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics , 1988 .

[15]  Ye Yoon Hong,et al.  Supercalculators and university entrance calculus examinations , 2000 .

[16]  Fred Paas,et al.  Exploring Multidimensional Approaches to the Efficiency of Instructional Conditions , 2004 .

[17]  S. Hennessy,et al.  Graphing investigations using portable (palmtop) technology , 2001, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[18]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory: Instructional Implications of the Interaction between Information Structures and Cognitive Architecture , 2004 .

[19]  Annette Thorson.  Integrating Technology in the Classroom. , 1999 .

[20]  최영한,et al.  미국 NCTM의 Principles and Standards for School Mathematics에 나타난 수학과 교수,학습의 이론 , 2002 .

[21]  Daniel Q. Naiman,et al.  K-12 Calculator Usage and College Grades , 2004 .