Politicization of the Low-Carb High-Fat Diet in Sweden, Promoted On Social Media by Non-Conventional Experts

The low-carb high fat LCHF diet, a buzz diet in Sweden, is stirring dogmatic conflict between dieters and representatives from the National Food Agency NFA, even gaining international reputation. After gathering materials from social media and press reports covering the popular diet, a thematic analysis has been conducted. The aim of this study was to investigate how three non-conventional experts and influential promoters of the LCHF movement transact their criticisms of current nutrition authorities, and how they utilize social media for their purpose. The diet has been highly politicized, creating distrust against the established scientific community. Findings indicate that events on the national level led to an increased public awareness of the LCHF diet, providing the supporters with invaluable opportunities to criticize the established nutritional community. This enabled certain prominent advocates of the diet to gain momentum while using features of social media to further the diet's believability.

[1]  Henry Jenkins.  Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide , 2006 .

[2]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[3]  Signe Rousseau,et al.  Food and Social Media: You Are What You Tweet , 2012 .

[4]  R. McLean,et al.  Low carbohydrate diets: going against the grain , 2014, The Lancet.

[5]  Stephen Hilgartner,et al.  The Dominant View of Popularization: Conceptual Problems, Political Uses , 1990 .

[6]  A. Giddens.  The consequences of modernity , 1990 .

[7]  M. Bucchi.  Science and the Media: Alternative Routes in Scientific Communication , 2014 .

[8]  Paul Belleflamme,et al.  Crowdfunding: Tapping the Right Crowd , 2013, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[9]  G. S. O'Keeffe,et al.  The Impact of Social Media on Children, Adolescents, and Families , 2011, Pediatrics.

[10]  Henry Jenkins,et al.  Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture , 2013 .

[11]  L. Pellizzoni.  Knowledge, Uncertainty and the Transformation of the Public Sphere , 2003 .

[12]  P. Pichon,et al.  Food‐related risk‐reduction strategies: purchasing and consumption processes , 2004 .

[13]  H. Kuusela,et al.  Online lifestyle consumption community dynamics: A practice‐based analysis , 2013 .

[14]  Craig J Thompson.  Consumer Risk Perceptions in a Community of Reflexive Doubt , 2005 .

[15]  Zizi Papacharissi.  A Private Sphere: Democracy in a Digital Age , 2010 .

[16]  K. Cwiertka.  Modern Japanese Cuisine: Food, Power and National Identity , 2007 .

[17]  C. Bazerman.  Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science , 1989 .

[18]  Peter Dahlgren.  Media and Political Engagement: Citizens, Communication and Democracy , 2009 .

[19]  Mary McCarthy,et al.  Weight stigma and narrative resistance evident in online discussions of obesity , 2014, Appetite.

[20]  A. Kata.  Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm--an overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement. , 2012, Vaccine.

[21]  Kumanan Wilson,et al.  Coping with public health 2.0 , 2009, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[22]  B. Loader,et al.  Social media and democracy : innovations in participatory politics , 2012 .

[23]  Phyllis B. Gerstenfeld,et al.  Hate Online: A Content Analysis of Extremist Internet Sites , 2003 .

[24]  R. Laugharne.  Evidence-based medicine, user involvement and the post-modern paradigm , 1999 .

[25]  P. Eckler,et al.  Social Media and Health Care: An Overview , 2010, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[26]  Emily Martin,et al.  Anthropology and the Cultural Study of Science , 1998 .

[27]  Aner Tal,et al.  Ingredient-Based Food Fears and Avoidance: Antecedents and Antidotes , 2014 .

[28]  Andreas Gunnarsson,et al.  Food Fight! The Swedish Low-Carb/High Fat (LCHF) Movement and the Turning of Science Popularisation Against the Scientists , 2012 .

[29]  J. Stilgoe,et al.  Experts and Anecdotes , 2009 .

[30]  J. Gregory,et al.  Science in Public: Communication, Culture and Credibility , 2000 .

[31]  Jennifer Wofford.  User-generated content , 2012, New Media Soc..

[32]  B. Latour.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[33]  G. Myers.  Discourse Studies of Scientific Popularization: Questioning the Boundaries , 2003 .

[34]  Bruce V. Lewenstein,et al.  From Fax to Facts: Communication in the Cold Fusion Saga , 1995 .

[35]  J. Mäkelä,et al.  Consumers’ everyday food choice strategies in Finland , 2006 .

[36]  J. Mann,et al.  Fad diets in Sweden, of all places , 2009, The Lancet.

[37]  S Chapman,et al.  Gone viral? Heard the buzz? A guide for public health practitioners and researchers on how Web 2.0 can subvert advertising restrictions and spread health information , 2008, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[38]  G. Hallmans,et al.  Associations among 25-year trends in diet, cholesterol and BMI from 140,000 observations in men and women in Northern Sweden , 2012, Nutrition Journal.

[39]  Andrew Keen,et al.  Book Review: Andrew Keen, The Cult of the Amateur: How Today's Internet Is Killing Our Culture and Assaulting Our Economy. London and Boston, MA: Currency/Doubleday, 2007. 228 pp. ISBN 0—3855—2080—8, $22.95 (pbk) , 2008, New Media Soc..

[40]  Cameron D. Norman.  Social media and health promotion , 2012, Global health promotion.

[41]  D. M. Kaplan.  The Philosophy of Food , 2012 .

[42]  L. Bonetta.  Scientists Enter the Blogosphere , 2007, Cell.

[43]  E. Widdowson.  Self-Experimentation in Nutrition Research , 1993, Nutrition Research Reviews.

[44]  J. Shaw,et al.  Using social media for support and feedback by mental health service users: thematic analysis of a twitter conversation , 2015, BMC Psychiatry.