Active Vibration Suppression With Time Delayed Feedback

Various active vibration suppression techniques, which use feedback control, are implemented on the structures. In real application, time delay can not be avoided especially in the feedback line of the actively controlled systems. The effects of the delay have to be thoroughly understood from the perspective of system stability and the performance of the controlled system. Often used control laws are developed without taking the delay into account. They fulfill the design requirements when free of delay. As unavoidable delay appears, however, the performance of the control changes. This work addresses the stability analysis of such dynamics as the control law remains unchanged but carries the effect of feedback time-delay, which can be varied. For this stability analysis along the delay axis, we follow up a recent methodology of the authors, the Direct Method (DM), which offers a unique and unprecedented treatment of a general class of linear time invariant time delayed systems (LTI-TDS). We discuss the underlying features and the highlights of the method briefly. Over an example vibration suppression setting we declare the stability intervals of the dynamics in time delay space using the DM. Having assessed the stability, we then look at the frequency response characteristics of the system as performance indications.

[1]  C. Nett,et al.  A new method for computing delay margins for stability of linear delay systems , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 33rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[2]  Panagiotis Tsiotras,et al.  Stability of time-delay systems: equivalence between Lyapunov and scaled small-gain conditions , 2001, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[3]  Nejat Olgac,et al.  A Novel Active Vibration Absorption Technique: Delayed Resonator , 1994 .

[4]  J. Hale,et al.  Stability in Linear Delay Equations. , 1985 .

[5]  K. Cooke,et al.  On zeroes of some transcendental equations , 1986 .

[6]  Akio Nagamatsu,et al.  Simultaneous Optimum Design Method for Multiple Dynamic Absorbers to Control Multiple Resonance Peaks , 1991 .

[7]  Martin Hosek,et al.  Active Vibration Control of Distributed Systems Using Delayed Resonator With Acceleration Feedback , 1997 .

[8]  A. Thowsen The Routh-Hurwitz method for stability determination of linear differential-difference systems† , 1981 .

[9]  PooGyeon Park,et al.  A delay-dependent stability criterion for systems with uncertain time-invariant delays , 1999, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[10]  V. Kolmanovskii,et al.  Stability of Functional Differential Equations , 1986 .

[11]  Arild Thowsen Delay-independent asymptotic stability of linear systems , 1982 .

[12]  A. Thowsen,et al.  An analytic stability test for a class of time-delay systems , 1981 .

[13]  Martin Hosek,et al.  A new perspective and analysis for regenerative machine tool chatter , 1998 .

[14]  Jie Chen On computing the maximal delay intervals for stability of linear delay systems , 1995, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[15]  Silviu-Iulian Niculescu,et al.  Additional dynamics in transformed time-delay systems , 2000, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[16]  Jack K. Hale,et al.  Strong stabilization of neutral functional differential equations , 2002 .

[17]  Rifat Sipahi,et al.  An exact method for the stability analysis of time-delayed linear time-invariant (LTI) systems , 2002, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[18]  Ezra Zeheb,et al.  Simplified analytic stability test for systems with commensurate time delays , 1984 .

[19]  Jack K. Hale,et al.  Introduction to Functional Differential Equations , 1993, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[20]  Jack K. Hale,et al.  Effects of Small Delays on Stability and Control , 2001 .

[21]  Nader Jalili,et al.  MULTIPLE DELAYED RESONATOR VIBRATION ABSORBERS FOR MULTI-DEGREE-OF-FREEDOM MECHANICAL STRUCTURES , 1999 .