CD8+ CTL Priming by Exact Peptide Epitopes in Incomplete Freund’s Adjuvant Induces a Vanishing CTL Response, whereas Long Peptides Induce Sustained CTL Reactivity1

Therapeutic vaccination trials, in which patients with cancer were vaccinated with minimal CTL peptide in oil-in-water formulations, have met with limited success. Many of these studies were based on the promising data of mice studies, showing that vaccination with a short synthetic peptide in IFA results in protective CD8+ T cell immunity. By use of the highly immunogenic OVA CTL peptide in IFA as a model peptide-based vaccine, we investigated why minimal CTL peptide vaccines in IFA performed so inadequately to allow full optimization of peptide vaccination. Injection of the minimal MHC class I-binding OVA257–264 peptide in IFA transiently activated CD8+ effector T cells, which eventually failed to undergo secondary expansion or to kill target cells, as a result of a sustained and systemic presentation of the CTL peptides gradually leaking out of the IFA depot without systemic danger signals. Complementation of this vaccine with the MHC class II-binding Th peptide (OVA323–339) restored both secondary expansion and in vivo effector functions of CD8+ T cells. Simply extending the CTL peptide to a length of 30 aa also preserved these CD8+ T cell functions, independent of T cell help, because the longer CTL peptide was predominantly presented in the locally inflamed draining lymph node. Importantly, these functional differences were reproduced in two additional model Ag systems. Our data clearly show why priming of CTL with minimal peptide epitopes in IFA is suboptimal, and demonstrate that the use of longer versions of these CTL peptide epitopes ensures the induction of sustained effector CD8+ T cell reactivity in vivo.

[1]  Lihua Huang,et al.  Impact of variable domain glycosylation on antibody clearance: an LC/MS characterization. , 2006, Analytical biochemistry.

[2]  A. Rosato,et al.  Predicting Tumor Outcome following Cancer Vaccination by Monitoring Quantitative and Qualitative CD8+ T Cell Parameters1 , 2006, The Journal of Immunology.

[3]  R. G. van der Most,et al.  Cranking the immunologic engine with chemotherapy: using context to drive tumor antigen cross-presentation towards useful antitumor immunity. , 2006, Cancer research.

[4]  C. Sousa,et al.  Inflammatory mediators are insufficient for full dendritic cell activation and promote expansion of CD4+ T cell populations lacking helper function , 2005, Nature Immunology.

[5]  Simone Mocellin,et al.  Part I: Vaccines for solid tumours. , 2004, The Lancet. Oncology.

[6]  S. Rosenberg,et al.  Cancer immunotherapy: moving beyond current vaccines , 2004, Nature Medicine.

[7]  P. Stern,et al.  Vaccine and antibody-directed T cell tumour immunotherapy. , 2004, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[8]  Stephen P. Schoenberger,et al.  Dynamic programming of CD8+ T lymphocyte responses , 2003, Nature Immunology.

[9]  S. H. van der Burg,et al.  Established Human Papillomavirus Type 16-Expressing Tumors Are Effectively Eradicated Following Vaccination with Long Peptides1 , 2002, The Journal of Immunology.

[10]  A. Shibaki,et al.  Induction of skewed Th1/Th2 T‐cell differentiation via subcutaneous immunization with Freund's adjuvant , 2002, Experimental dermatology.

[11]  A. Kukita,et al.  Balance of Th1/Th2 cytokines associated with the preventive effect of incomplete Freund's adjuvant on the development of adjuvant arthritis in LEW rats. , 2001, Journal of autoimmunity.

[12]  R. Offringa,et al.  Longevity of Antigen Presentation and Activation Status of APC Are Decisive Factors in the Balance Between CTL Immunity Versus Tolerance1 , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.

[13]  H. Schreiber,et al.  Pharmacokinetic Differences Between a T Cell-Tolerizing and a T Cell-Activating Peptide1 , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.

[14]  S. H. van der Burg,et al.  Importance of CD4(+) T helper cell responses in tumor immunity. , 2000, Immunology letters.

[15]  T. Schumacher,et al.  CD40 activation in vivo overcomes peptide-induced peripheral cytotoxic T-lymphocyte tolerance and augments anti-tumor vaccine efficacy , 1999, Nature Medicine.

[16]  S. Levy,et al.  Cytotoxic T cell responses to DNA vaccination: dependence on antigen presentation via class II MHC. , 1998, Journal of immunology.

[17]  W. Heath,et al.  B Cells Directly Tolerize CD8+ T Cells , 1998, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[18]  Stephen P. Schoenberger,et al.  T-cell help for cytotoxic T lymphocytes is mediated by CD40–CD40L interactions , 1998, Nature.

[19]  A. Lanzavecchia Licence to kill , 1998 .

[20]  Polly Matzinger,et al.  A conditioned dendritic cell can be a temporal bridge between a CD4+ T-helper and a T-killer cell , 1998, Nature.

[21]  Richard A. Flavell,et al.  Help for cytotoxic-T-cell responses is mediated by CD40 signalling , 1998, Nature.

[22]  C. Melief,et al.  Specific T Helper Cell Requirement for Optimal Induction of Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes against Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II Negative Tumors , 1998, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[23]  W. Heath,et al.  Defective TCR expression in transgenic mice constructed using cDNA‐based α‐ and β‐chain genes under the control of heterologous regulatory elements , 1998, Immunology and cell biology.

[24]  R. Dyall,et al.  The critical role of a solvent-exposed residue of an MHC class I-restricted peptide in MHC-peptide binding. , 1997, International immunology.

[25]  R. Offringa,et al.  Peptide vaccination can lead to enhanced tumor growth through specific T-cell tolerance induction. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  R. Offringa,et al.  Enhanced tumor outgrowth after peptide vaccination. Functional deletion of tumor-specific CTL induced by peptide vaccination can lead to the inability to reject tumors. , 1996, Journal of immunology.

[27]  S. H. van der Burg,et al.  Immunogenicity of peptides bound to MHC class I molecules depends on the MHC-peptide complex stability. , 1996, Journal of immunology.

[28]  S. H. van der Burg,et al.  Cytotoxic T lymphocytes raised against a subdominant epitope offered as a synthetic peptide eradicate human papillomavirus type 16‐induced tumors , 1995, European journal of immunology.

[29]  M. Feltkamp,et al.  Dendritic cells as carriers for a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte epitope-based peptide vaccine in protection against a human papillomavirus type 16-induced tumor. , 1995, Journal of immunotherapy with emphasis on tumor immunology : official journal of the Society for Biological Therapy.

[30]  H. Pircher,et al.  T cell priming versus T cell tolerance induced by synthetic peptides , 1995, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[31]  K. Heeg,et al.  In vivo CTL induction with point-substituted ovalbumin peptides: immunogenicity correlates with peptide-induced MHC class I stability. , 1995, Vaccine.

[32]  M. Feltkamp,et al.  Efficient MHC class I-peptide binding is required but does not ensure MHC class I-restricted immunogenicity. , 1994, Molecular immunology.

[33]  S. Rosenberg,et al.  Insertion signal sequence fused to minimal peptides elicits specific CD8+ T-cell responses and prolongs survival of thymoma-bearing mice. , 1994, Cancer research.

[34]  H. Pircher,et al.  Peptide-induced T-cell tolerance to prevent autoimmune diabetes in a transgenic mouse model. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  Kristin A. Hogquist,et al.  T cell receptor antagonist peptides induce positive selection , 1994, Cell.

[36]  P. Matzinger Tolerance, danger, and the extended family. , 1994, Annual review of immunology.

[37]  M. Feltkamp,et al.  Vaccination with cytotoxic T lymphocyte epitope‐containing peptide protects against a tumor induced by human papillomavirus type 16‐transformed cells , 1993, European journal of immunology.

[38]  Hans Hengartner,et al.  T cell immunity after a viral infection versus T cell tolerance induced by soluble viral peptides , 1993, European journal of immunology.

[39]  R. Brandt,et al.  Strict peptide length is not required for the induction of cytotoxic T lymphocyte‐mediated antiviral protection by peptide vaccination , 1993, European journal of immunology.

[40]  M Hoffman,et al.  Primary in vivo responses to ovalbumin. Probing the predictive value of the Kb binding motif. , 1993, Journal of immunology.

[41]  P. Romero,et al.  T helper epitopes enhance the cytotoxic response of mice immunized with MHC class I-restricted malaria peptides. , 1992, Journal of immunological methods.

[42]  L. Ährlund‐Richter,et al.  Immunization against polyoma tumors with synthetic peptides derived from the sequences of middle‐and large‐T antigens , 1992, International journal of cancer.

[43]  C. Leclerc,et al.  In vivo induction of cytotoxic T cell response by a free synthetic peptide requires CD4+ T cell help. , 1991, Journal of immunology.

[44]  F. Liew,et al.  Priming of influenza virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes vivo by short synthetic peptides. , 1991, Journal of immunology.

[45]  B. Zarowitz Human Monoclonal Antibody against Endotoxin , 1991, DICP : the annals of pharmacotherapy.

[46]  W. Kast,et al.  Protection against lethal Sendai virus infection by in vivo priming of virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes with a free synthetic peptide. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  R. Zinkernagel,et al.  Peptide-induced antiviral protection by cytotoxic T cells. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  A. Heimberger,et al.  Induction by antigen of intrathymic apoptosis of CD4+CD8+TCRlo thymocytes in vivo. , 1990, Science.

[49]  R. Zinkernagel,et al.  Antiviral cytotoxic T cell response induced by in vivo priming with a free synthetic peptide , 1990, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[50]  M. Bevan,et al.  Introduction of soluble protein into the class I pathway of antigen processing and presentation , 1988, Cell.