A Pool of Pairs of Related Objects (POPORO) for Investigating Visual Semantic Integration: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Validation

[1]  Gastone G. Celesia,et al.  Visual evoked potentials and electroretinograms , 2012 .

[2]  Guillaume A. Rousselet,et al.  Reliability of ERP and single-trial analyses , 2011, NeuroImage.

[3]  Guillaume A. Rousselet,et al.  LIMO EEG: A Toolbox for Hierarchical LInear MOdeling of ElectroEncephaloGraphic Data , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[4]  R. B. Reilly,et al.  FASTER: Fully Automated Statistical Thresholding for EEG artifact Rejection , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[5]  Carryl L. Baldwin,et al.  Cloze probability and completion norms for 498 sentences: Behavioral and neural validation using event-related potentials , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[6]  L. Deouell,et al.  ERP evidence for context congruity effects during simultaneous object–scene processing , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400 , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[8]  Phillip J. Holcomb,et al.  Two Neurocognitive Mechanisms of Semantic Integration during the Comprehension of Visual Real-world Events , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  G. Rousselet,et al.  Parametric study of EEG sensitivity to phase noise during face processing , 2008, BMC Neuroscience.

[10]  M. Murray,et al.  Generating Controlled Image Sets in Cognitive Neuroscience Research , 2008, Brain Topography.

[11]  A. Torralba,et al.  The role of context in object recognition , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  J. Rieger,et al.  Stimulus intensity affects early sensory processing: visual contrast modulates evoked gamma-band activity in human EEG. , 2007, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[13]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[14]  Kara D. Federmeier.  Thinking ahead: the role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[15]  Christoph S. Herrmann,et al.  EEG oscillations in the gamma and alpha range respond differently to spatial frequency , 2007, Vision Research.

[16]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Levels of processing during non-conscious perception: a critical review of visual masking , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  Nick Donnelly,et al.  Nontarget objects can influence perceptual processes during object recognition , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  Haibin Ling,et al.  Shape Classification Using the Inner-Distance , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[19]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  A cross-laboratory study of event-related gamma activity in a standard object recognition paradigm , 2006, NeuroImage.

[20]  James E. Hoffman,et al.  Object Substitution Masking Interferes With Semantic Processing , 2006, Psychological science.

[21]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data , 2006, NeuroImage.

[22]  Markus Kiefer,et al.  Attentional Modulation of Unconscious Automatic Processes: Evidence from Event-related Potentials in a Masked Priming Paradigm , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[25]  Andy Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS (Ism Introducing Statistical Methods) , 2005 .

[26]  Stefan Debener,et al.  Size matters: effects of stimulus size, duration and eccentricity on the visual gamma-band response , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[27]  Jodi L. Davenport,et al.  Scene Consistency in Object and Background Perception , 2004, Psychological science.

[28]  M. Bar.  Visual objects in context , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[29]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric mapping for event-related potentials: I. Generic considerations , 2004, NeuroImage.

[30]  M. Bar,et al.  Cortical Analysis of Visual Context , 2003, Neuron.

[31]  M. Kutas,et al.  An electrophysiological study of scene effects on object identification. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[32]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Picture the difference: electrophysiological investigations of picture processing in the two cerebral hemispheres , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  Blake W. Johnson,et al.  Comparison of the N300 and N400 ERPs to picture stimuli in congruent and incongruent contexts , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[34]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[35]  I Rosén,et al.  Semantic processing without conscious identification: evidence from event-related potentials. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[36]  J. Henderson,et al.  Object identification is isolated from scene semantic constraint: evidence from object type and token discrimination. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[37]  E. Vogel,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence for a Postperceptual Locus of Suppression during the Attentional Blink Time-based Attention and the Attentional Blink , 1998 .

[38]  M. Kutas,et al.  The Search for Common Sense: An Electrophysiological Study of the Comprehension of Words and Pictures in Reading , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[39]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-Related Brain Potentials Reflect Semantic Priming in an Object Decision Task , 1994, Brain and Cognition.

[40]  M. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials and the semantic matching of pictures , 1990, Brain and Cognition.

[41]  P. Schwanenflugel,et al.  Semantic relatedness and the scope of facilitation for upcoming words in sentences. , 1988 .

[42]  M. Kutas,et al.  Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association , 1984, Nature.

[43]  I. Biederman,et al.  Scene perception: Detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[44]  I. Fischler,et al.  Completion norms for 329 sentence contexts , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[45]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[46]  T. Paine.  Common Sense , 1995 .

[47]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[48]  P. Holcomb,et al.  An electrophysiological investigation of semantic priming with pictures of real objects. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[49]  J. Hoffman,et al.  N400 to Semantically Anomalous Pictures and Words , 1992, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[50]  Ernst Fernando Lopes Da Silva Niedermeyer,et al.  Electroencephalography, basic principles, clinical applications, and related fields , 1982 .