Absolute Stability of Chaotic Asynchronous Multi-Interactions Schemes for Solving ODE

Multi Interaction Systems, used in the context of Virtual Reality, are dedicated to real-time interactive simulations. They open the way to the in virtuo experimentation, especially useful in the domain of biochemical kinetics. To this purpose, chaotic and asynchronous scheduling of autonomous processes is based upon desynchronization of phenomena involved in the system. It permits interactivity, especially the capability to add or remove phenomena in the course of a simulation. It provides methods of resolution of ordinary differential systems and partial derivative equations. Proofs of convergence for these methods have been established, but the problem of absolute stability, although it is crucial when considering multiscale or stiff problems, has not yet been treated. The aim of this article is to present absolute stability conditions for chaotic and asynchronous schemes. We give criteria so as to predict instability thresholds, and study in details the significant example of a damped spring-mass system. Our results, which make use of random matrices products theory, stress the point that the desynchronization of phenomena, and a random scheduling of their activations, can lead to instability.

[1]  J. L. Bos,et al.  ras oncogenes in human cancer: a review. , 1989, Cancer research.

[2]  Karline Soetaert,et al.  Solving Ordinary Differential Equations in R , 2012 .

[3]  Ernst Hairer,et al.  Solving Ordinary Differential Equations I: Nonstiff Problems , 2009 .

[4]  Vincent Rodin,et al.  Formal Validation of Asynchronous Interaction-Agents Algorithms for Reaction-Diffusion Problems , 2007, 21st International Workshop on Principles of Advanced and Distributed Simulation (PADS'07).

[5]  Shardool U. Chirputkar,et al.  Coupled Atomistic/Continuum Simulation based on Extended Space-Time Finite Element Method , 2008 .

[6]  Uri M. Ascher,et al.  Computer methods for ordinary differential equations and differential-algebraic equations , 1998 .

[7]  F. Krogh,et al.  Solving Ordinary Differential Equations , 2019, Programming for Computations - Python.

[8]  M. Bernhard Introduction to Chaotic Dynamical Systems , 1992 .

[9]  D. Hanahan,et al.  The Hallmarks of Cancer , 2000, Cell.

[10]  E. Hairer,et al.  Solving Ordinary Differential Equations II: Stiff and Differential-Algebraic Problems , 2010 .

[11]  Sriram Krishnaswamy,et al.  Formation of Factors IXa and Xa by the Extrinsic Pathway , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[12]  J. Tisseau,et al.  Comparison of sea state statistics between a phenomenological model and field data , 2007, OCEANS 2007 - Europe.

[13]  G. Fitzgerald,et al.  Materials Modeling from Quantum Mechanics to The Mesoscale , 2008 .

[14]  G. Quispel,et al.  Splitting methods , 2002, Acta Numerica.

[15]  Vincent Rodin,et al.  Multi-Agents System to Model Cell Signalling by Using Fuzzy Cognitive Maps. Application to Computer Simulation of Multiple Myeloma , 2009, 2009 Ninth IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and BioEngineering.

[16]  Vincent Rodin,et al.  Reaction-Agents: First Mathematical Validation of a Multi-agent System for Dynamical Biochemical Kinetics , 2005, EPIA.

[17]  Vincent Rodin,et al.  In virtuo Experiments Based on the Multi-Interaction System Framework: the RéISCOP Meta-Model. , 2009 .

[18]  Vincent Rodin,et al.  Uses of multiagents systems for simulation of MAPK pathway , 2003, Third IEEE Symposium on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering, 2003. Proceedings..

[19]  P. Bougerol,et al.  Products of Random Matrices with Applications to Schrödinger Operators , 1985 .

[20]  G. Quispel,et al.  Acta Numerica 2002: Splitting methods , 2002 .

[21]  高等学校計算数学学報編輯委員会編 高等学校計算数学学報 = Numerical mathematics , 1979 .

[22]  Garry Howell,et al.  An Introduction to Chaotic dynamical systems. 2nd Edition, by Robert L. Devaney , 1990 .