Evaluation and systematic selection of significant multi-scale surface roughness parameters (SRPs) as process monitoring index

The evaluation of multi-scale surface roughness parameters (SRPs) is important to solve many engineering problems (e.g. contact stress, sealing, friction) and is closely related to further fundamental problems (e.g. microbial contamination). Traditionally, surface roughness has been used as a standard for indicating process performance, such as tool wear, tool vibration etc. This paper also aims to find appropriate surface roughness parameters (SRPs) that can be used as process monitoring indices. Grade 304 stainless steel surfaces, generated by extrusion and grinding processes, were used in this study. The evaluation of different SRPs and their topography properties (such as fractal dimension) is discussed for extruded and ground surfaces. One problem with existing surface metrology is the availability of a multitude of disconnected roughness parameters. A statistical approach is presented in this paper that allows the most appropriate roughness parameters to monitor whether the intended surface quality converges to be found.

[1]  Claire Lartigue,et al.  Realistic simulation of surface defects in five-axis milling using the measured geometry of the tool , 2014 .

[2]  S. Ha,et al.  Biofilm formation by Vibrio parahaemolyticus on food and food contact surfaces increases with rise in temperature , 2016 .

[3]  David J. Whitehouse,et al.  Handbook of Surface and Nanometrology , 2002 .

[4]  Maxence Bigerelle,et al.  The multi-scale roughness analyses and modeling of abrasion with the grit size effect on ground surfaces , 2012 .

[5]  Benoit B. Mandelbrot,et al.  Multifractal measures, especially for the geophysicist , 1989 .

[6]  M. Vieira,et al.  A review of current and emergent biofilm control strategies , 2010 .

[7]  W. Grzesik.  Prediction of the Functional Performance of Machined Components Based on Surface Topography: State of the Art , 2016, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance.

[8]  W. Grzesik,et al.  Characterization of surface textures generated on hardened steel parts in high-precision machining operations , 2015 .

[9]  T. Matsumura,et al.  Micro fabrication on cylinder surface for control of wettability , 2013 .

[10]  Possibilities of the Generation of Hardened Steel Parts With Defined Topographic Characteristics of the Machined Surfaces , 2015 .

[11]  Barbara Linke,et al.  A review on properties of abrasive grits and grit selection , 2015 .

[12]  J. Bryan,et al.  Scale-Sensitive Fractal Analysis of Turned Surfaces , 1996 .

[13]  Ru Lin Peng,et al.  Surface integrity of 2304 duplex stainless steel after different grinding operations , 2016 .

[14]  Richard K. Leach,et al.  Characterisation of Areal Surface Texture , 2013 .

[15]  Wilfried Eichlseder,et al.  The effect of machining on the surface integrity and fatigue life , 2008 .

[16]  B. J. Griffiths.  Modelling Complex Force Systems, Part 1: The Cutting and Pad Forces in Deep Drilling , 1993 .

[17]  İlhan Asiltürk,et al.  Optimisation of parameters affecting surface roughness of Co28Cr6Mo medical material during CNC lathe machining by using the Taguchi and RSM methods , 2016 .

[18]  Lone Gram,et al.  Influence of surface roughness of stainless steel on microbial adhesion and corrosion resistance , 2003 .

[19]  B. Nowicki.  Multiparameter representation of surface roughness , 1985 .

[20]  P. K. Brahmankar,et al.  Investigations on surface integrity of AISI 1045 using LPB tool , 2008 .

[21]  J. Davim.  Surface Integrity in Machining , 2010 .

[22]  Yuan-zhong Hu,et al.  Effect of surface roughness parameters on mixed lubrication characteristics , 2006 .

[23]  Z. Marković,et al.  Multifractal characterization of single wall carbon nanotube thin films surface upon exposure to optical parametric oscillator laser irradiation , 2014 .

[24]  Hans Nørgaard Hansen,et al.  Quantitative Characterisation of Surface Texture , 2000 .

[25]  Xibin Wang,et al.  Fractal analysis of surface topography in ground monocrystal sapphire , 2015 .

[26]  Ekkard Brinksmeier,et al.  Surface integrity in material removal processes: Recent advances , 2011 .

[27]  Nacim Betrouni,et al.  Fractal and multifractal analysis: A review , 2009, Medical Image Anal..

[28]  M. Kiyak,et al.  Examination of machining parameters on surface roughness in EDM of tool steel , 2007 .

[29]  N. H. Woolley,et al.  The effects of cutting fluid application methods on the grinding process , 2000 .

[30]  Barbara Linke,et al.  Effect of Manual Grinding Operations on Surface Integrity , 2016 .

[31]  C. Brown,et al.  A Comparison of Topographic Characterization Parameters in Grinding , 1997 .

[32]  Claire Lartigue,et al.  Multi-scale Curvature Analysis and Correlations with the Fatigue Limit on Steel Surfaces after Milling , 2014 .

[33]  Stanislaw Legutko,et al.  Metrological changes in surface morphology of high-strength steels in manufacturing processes , 2016 .

[34]  A. Matthews,et al.  The effect of combined shot-peening and PEO treatment on the corrosion performance of 2024 Al alloy , 2007 .

[35]  Guang H. Yue,et al.  Fractal Dimension Studies of the Brain Shape in Aging and Neurodegenerative Diseases , 2016 .

[36]  W. Grzesik,et al.  Hybrid approach to surface roughness evaluation in multistage machining processes , 2003 .

[37]  P. Marcus,et al.  The fate of the protective oxide film on stainless steel upon early stage growth of a biofilm , 2015 .

[38]  Barbara Linke,et al.  Aesthetics and Gloss of Ground Surfaces: A Review on Measurement and Generation , 2016 .