Seafloor ground rotation observations: potential for improving signal-to-noise ratio on horizontal OBS components

It is well known that the horizontal components of ocean bottom seismometer (OBS) records have a very poor signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio compared to the vertical components, the difference substantially exceeding that of terrestrial records. This is unfortunate as 1) OBS experiments are the main possibility to gather data in offshore areas, and 2) today we are more and more interested in modelling complete waveforms including all three components aiming at optimally constraining geophysical parameters for inverse problems for Earth’s structure and seismic sources. Despite the fact that it is expected that tilting is the major cause of this high S/N – to our knowledge – this effect has never been directly observed. The reason is that (standard) instruments for the measurement of uncontaminated rotational ground motions with the required sensitivity still do not exist. Here, we report observations from an experiment we carried out in the North Sea, close to the island of Helgoland in the summer of 2014. A commercial fibre-optic gyro (usually used for navigation purposes) recording ground rotation rate with a sensitivity of approx. 10-6 rad/s was mounted on an OBS system together with a broadband seismometer. The system was lowered to the seafloor for about a week. To investigate a potential connection between rotational ground motions around the two horizontal axes (i.e., tilting) we calculate the coherence between the corresponding motion components (e.g., rotations around x-axis and translational motions along y-axis, and vice versa). We find very high correlations, on average exceeding 0.9 in the period interval 5-15 seconds. Correlations seem to increase with noise amplitude. Rotation rate amplitudes are in the range of 10-5 rad/s. This clearly indicates that the horizontal translational components are severely contaminated by rotations around the horizontal axes. The ground rotation observations allow correcting for this effect thereby considerably improving the S/N on the horizontal translational components. The relatively high-amplitude rotational motions are expected to originate from water motion, seafloor interface waves or both. An added benefit of seafloor ground rotation observations using fibre-optic systems is that the orientation of the recording system is known to within a degree, as the optical system uses the Earth’s rotation as a reference.

[1]  Lion Krischer,et al.  ObsPy: A Python Toolbox for Seismology , 2010 .

[2]  Hendrik L. Tolman,et al.  A New Global Wave Forecast System at NCEP , 1998 .

[3]  V. Graizer The Response to Complex Ground Motions of Seismometers with Galperin Sensor Configuration , 2009 .

[4]  Denis Legrand,et al.  Interpretation of Broadband Ocean-Bottom Seismometer Horizontal Data Seismic Background Noise , 2009 .

[5]  A. Pancha,et al.  Ring laser detection of rotations from teleseismic waves , 2000 .

[6]  G. Sutton,et al.  Current-generated noise recorded on ocean bottom seismometers , 1981 .

[7]  P. W. Rodgers The response of the horizontal pendulum seismometer to Rayleigh and Love waves, tilt, and free oscillations of the earth , 1968 .

[8]  George H. Sutton,et al.  Fidelity of ocean bottom seismic observations , 1995 .

[9]  H. Shiobara,et al.  Improvement of Seismic Observation in the Ocean by Use of Seafloor Boreholes , 2004 .

[10]  Sharon Kedar,et al.  The origin of deep ocean microseisms in the North Atlantic Ocean , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[11]  John D. Hunter,et al.  Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment , 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[12]  G. H. Sutton,et al.  Ocean-bottom seismic observatories , 1965 .

[13]  G. Barruol,et al.  Performance report of the RHUM-RUM ocean bottom seismometer network around La Réunion, western Indian Ocean , 2016 .

[14]  Ulrich Schreiber,et al.  Comparison of standard and ring laser rotational seismograms , 1998, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[15]  S. Webb,et al.  Broadband seismology and noise under the ocean , 1998 .

[16]  G. Laske,et al.  The character of seafloor ambient noise recorded offshore New Zealand: Results from the MOANA ocean bottom seismic experiment , 2012 .

[17]  Athol J. Carr,et al.  The Application of Fiber Optic Gyroscopes for the Measurement of Rotations in Structural Engineering , 2009 .

[18]  K. R. Peal,et al.  Broadband seismology in the oceans: Lessons from the Ocean Seismic Network Pilot Experiment , 2001 .

[19]  S. C. Webb Long-period acoustic and seismic measurements and ocean floor currents , 1988 .

[20]  Heiner Igel,et al.  Rotational sensors—a comparison of different sensor types , 2012, Journal of Seismology.

[21]  Vladimir Graizer,et al.  Tilts in Strong Ground Motion , 2006 .

[22]  W. Crawford,et al.  Shallow-Water Broadband OBS Seismology , 2010 .

[23]  J. Peterson,et al.  Observations and modeling of seismic background noise , 1993 .

[24]  M. Longuet-Higgins A theory of the origin of microseisms , 1950, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[25]  T. Dahm,et al.  Seismic Broadband Ocean-Bottom Data and Noise Observed with Free-Fall Stations: Experiences from Long-Term Deployments in the North Atlantic and the Tyrrhenian Sea , 2006 .

[26]  Ralph A. Stephen,et al.  A Second Look at Low-Frequency Marine Vertical Seismometer Data Quality at the OSN-1 Site off Hawaii for Seafloor, Buried, and Borehole Emplacements , 2006 .

[27]  Lion Krischer,et al.  ObsPy – What can it do for data centers and observatories? , 2011 .

[28]  Wayne C. Crawford,et al.  Identifying and Removing Tilt Noise from Low-Frequency (! 0.1 Hz) Seafloor Vertical Seismic Data , 2000 .

[29]  Heiner Igel,et al.  Examining ambient noise using colocated measurements of rotational and translational motion , 2012, Journal of Seismology.