Show me the pictures: The effect of representational modalities on abductive reasoning in decision making

This paper describes a study designed to investigate the effect of concept representation types on the use of abductive reasoning by decision makers when selecting early stage innovation concepts for further development. According to prior research, abductive reasoning can be instrumental to decision makers in terms of generating testable hypotheses about an innovation concept’s future developments into concrete, viable product or service offerings. It has furthermore been linked with an increase in project acceptance rates. Here, an experiment is described testing whether visual concept representations promotes higher levels of abductive reasoning than textual concept representations or a combination of visuals and text. The results show that when purely visual concept representations were used, the participants showed a significant higher level of abductive reasoning than when this visual representation was complemented with text. This has managerial implications pertaining to how innovation concepts could/should be presented to selection committees or individuals in companies seeking to increase the amount of innovation projects that pass through a first screening process.

[1]  Richard Birmingham,et al.  Understanding engineering design : context, theory and practice , 1997 .

[2]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Decision Making With Texts: Information Analysis and Schema Acquisition , 1981 .

[3]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory: Techniques That Reduce Extraneous Cognitive Load and Manage Intrinsic Cognitive Load during Multimedia Learning , 2010 .

[4]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[5]  Laura J. Kornish,et al.  The Importance of the Raw Idea in Innovation: Testing the Sow's Ear Hypothesis , 2012 .

[6]  Kees Dorst,et al.  The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application , 2011 .

[7]  Andy Dong,et al.  The effect of abductive reasoning on concept selection decisions , 2015 .

[8]  Donald E. Hatfield,et al.  Doomed from the start: what is the value of selecting a future dominant design? , 1999 .

[9]  Charlotte H. Mason,et al.  Visual Representation: Implications for Decision Making , 2007 .

[10]  Bo T. Christensen,et al.  The role and impact of mental simulation in design , 2009 .

[11]  Andy Dong,et al.  Generative sensing in design evaluation , 2016 .

[12]  A. Tversky,et al.  Rational choice and the framing of decisions , 1990 .

[13]  Jami J. Shah,et al.  INFLUENCE OF DESIGN REPRESENTATION ON EFFECTIVENESS OF IDEA GENERATION , 2001 .

[14]  G. Meyer,et al.  The potential of actuarial decision models: Can they improve the venture capital investment decision? , 2000 .

[15]  Andy Dong,et al.  CHOOSING INNOVATION: HOW REASONING AFFECTS DECISION ERRORS , 2011 .

[16]  Colin Ware,et al.  Toward a Perceptual Theory of Flow Visualization , 2008, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[17]  G. Goldschmidt The dialectics of sketching , 1991 .

[18]  C. M. Gaglio The Role of Mental Simulations and Counterfactual Thinking in the Opportunity Identification Process * , 2004 .

[19]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[20]  Laura Huang,et al.  Managing the Unknowable , 2015 .

[21]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.