Food quality affects search strategy in the acellular slime mould, Physarum polycephalum

When searching for resources, organisms can increase the efficiency of search and exploitation behavior by using information about the quality of a current resource patch in their decision making. The search strategy used by an organism can in turn affect its performance in different landscapes. Here we examine the effect of resource quality on 2 foraging decisions: how much time to allocate to explore the environment for new resources and what search strategy to use during exploration. We used the slime mould Physarum polycephalum as our model system. Physarum polycephalum is an amoeboid organism that forages as a flowing mass of pseudopods. We quantified the search pattern of plasmodia after engulfment of food of 6 different qualities. Food quality had a significant, positive effect on how long plasmodia waited before resuming search behavior and on how long it took to abandon food disks. Food quality had a positive effect on fractal dimension, indicating that the amount of localized search performed by plasmodia increased with food quality. Our results suggest that increasing food quality results in a shift from extensive to intensive search. Next, we examined foraging performance in landscapes with different patch structures. Plasmodia in correlated landscapes (half the patches contained only high-quality food, half contained only low-quality food) gained more weight than plasmodia foraging in noncorrelated landscapes (patches contained both high- and low-quality food disks). Our results show that food quality affects exploitation and search behavior and that both behaviors influence foraging performance in different landscapes. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

[1]  Michael P. Hassell,et al.  Foraging Strategies of Insects , 1978 .

[2]  W. Dove,et al.  Growth and differentiation in Physarum polycephalum , 1980 .

[3]  Alan B. Bond,et al.  Optimal foraging in a uniform habitat: The search mechanism of the green lacewing , 1980, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  Sokal Rr,et al.  Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research 2nd edition. , 1981 .

[5]  A. Dixon,et al.  HABITAT QUALITY AND THE FORAGING BEHAVIOUR OF COCCINELLID LARVAE , 1982 .

[6]  D. Kessler,et al.  CHAPTER 5 – Plasmodial Structure and Motility , 1982 .

[7]  James N. McNair,et al.  Optimal Giving-Up Times and the Marginal Value Theorem , 1982, The American Naturalist.

[8]  E. F. Haskins,et al.  Cell Biology of Physarum and Didymium , 1983 .

[9]  G. Odell,et al.  Swarms of Predators Exhibit "Preytaxis" if Individual Predators Use Area-Restricted Search , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[10]  L. Boddy,et al.  Foraging patterns of Phallus impudicus, Phanerochaete laevis and Steccherinum fimbriatum between discontinuous resource units in soil , 1988 .

[11]  L. Boddy,et al.  Resource relationships of foraging mycelial systems of Phanerochaete velutina and Hypholoma fasciculare in soil. , 1989, The New phytologist.

[12]  Hiroshi Fujikawa,et al.  Fractal Growth of Bacillus subtilis on Agar Plates , 1989 .

[13]  P. Pfeifer,et al.  Microbial growth patterns described by fractal geometry , 1990, Journal of bacteriology.

[14]  D. Kramer,et al.  Exploration versus exploitation: a field study of time allocation to environmental tracking by foraging chipmunks , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  Hiroshi Fujikawa,et al.  Bacterial Fractal Growth in the Concentration Field of Nutrient , 1991 .

[16]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  Efficiency of area-concentrated searching behaviour in a continuous patchy environment* , 1992 .

[17]  J. H. Benedix Area-restricted search by the plains pocket gopher (Geomys bursarius) in tallgrass prairie habitat , 1993 .

[18]  P D Esser,et al.  Fractal Analysis of Pulmonary Arteries: The Fractal Dimension Is Lower in Pulmonary Hypertension , 1994, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[19]  W. B. Marks,et al.  Fractal methods and results in cellular morphology — dimensions, lacunarity and multifractals , 1996, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[20]  Thomas D. Seeley,et al.  Honey Bee Colonies are Group‐Level Adaptive Units , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[21]  L. Boddy,et al.  Resource acquisition by the mycelial-cord-former Stropharia caerulea: effect of resource quantity and quality , 1997 .

[22]  Larry S. Liebovitch,et al.  Fractals and Chaos Simplified for the Life Sciences , 1998 .

[23]  J. Obrycki,et al.  Searching Behavior ofColeomegilla maculataLarvae Feeding on Colorado Potato Beetle Eggs , 1998 .

[24]  Geri Wagner,et al.  Growth patterns of the slime mold Physarum on a nonuniform substrate , 1998 .

[25]  Lynne Boddy,et al.  Fractal analysis in studies of mycelium in soil , 1999 .

[26]  Lynne Boddy,et al.  SAPROTROPHIC CORD-FORMING FUNGI : MEETING THE CHALLENGE OF HETEROGENEOUS ENVIRONMENTS , 1999 .

[27]  Gregg Henderson,et al.  Effect of Available Food Size on Search Tunnel Formation by the Formosan Subterranean Termite (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) , 1999 .

[28]  T. Nakagaki,et al.  Smart behavior of true slime mold in a labyrinth. , 2001, Research in microbiology.

[29]  G. Quinn,et al.  Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists , 2002 .

[30]  Wolf M. Mooij,et al.  Search paths of swans foraging on spatially autocorrelated tubers , 2002 .

[31]  L. Boddy,et al.  Mycelial foraging by Resinicium bicolor: interactive effects of resource quantity, quality and soil composition. , 2002, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[32]  Daniel Fortin,et al.  Optimal searching behaviour: the value of sampling information , 2002 .

[33]  J. Shepherd,et al.  Trunk trails and the searching strategy of a leaf-cutter ant, Atta colombica , 1982, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[34]  T. Nakagaki,et al.  Smart network solutions in an amoeboid organism. , 2004, Biophysical chemistry.

[35]  Y. Nishiura,et al.  Obtaining multiple separate food sources: behavioural intelligence in the Physarum plasmodium , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  J. F. Sillon,et al.  Fractal analysis of the root architecture of Gliricidia sepium for the spatial prediction of root branching, size and mass: model development and evaluation in agroforestry , 1999, Plant and Soil.

[37]  A. Tero,et al.  Mathematical Model for Rhythmic Protoplasmic Movement in the True Slime Mold , 2006, Journal of mathematical biology.

[38]  Henri Weimerskirch,et al.  Does Prey Capture Induce Area‐Restricted Search? A Fine‐Scale Study Using GPS in a Marine Predator, the Wandering Albatross , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[39]  T. Nakagaki,et al.  Intelligent Behaviors of Amoeboid Movement Based on Complex Dynamics of Soft Matter , 2007 .

[40]  Toshiyuki Nakagaki,et al.  Amoebae anticipate periodic events. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[41]  C. J. Alexopoulos The Myxomycetes II , 2008, The Botanical Review.

[42]  Tanya Latty,et al.  Food quality and the risk of light exposure affect patch-choice decisions in the slime mold Physarum polycephalum. , 2010, Ecology.