Analysis of hot spot directional signatures measured from space

[1] Reflectance measurements from the spaceborne Polarization and Directionality of Earth Reflectances (POLDER) instrument are used to analyze the so-called hot spot directional signature in the backscattering direction. The hot spot is measured with an angular resolution better than half a degree using the directional capabilities of the radiometer, with some assumptions on the spatial homogeneity of the surface. The analysis yields the first quantitative observation of the hot spot signature of vegetated surfaces, with such angular resolution. The measurements show that the hot spot reflectance is a function of the phase angle ξ rather than a function of a parameter Δ, often used in hot spot modeling, that quantifies the horizontal distance between Sun and view directions. The observed directional signature is very accurately fitted by a linear ratio of the phase angle, as predicted by a simple theory of radiative transfer within the canopy foliage. Most of the measured hot spot half widths are between 1° and 2°. Some dispersion occurs for the cases belonging to the forest and desert International Geosphere-Biosphere Program (IGBP) classes, in the range 1° to 5°. Theory predicts that the width is independent of wavelength. Our measurements indicate that the widths at 670 and 865 nm are very close, but with a significant scatter in regards to the rather small variability. The distribution of the width as a function of the IGBP surface classification shows a variability within the classes that is larger than between the classes, except for the “evergreen broadleaf” class. The hot spot reflectance amplitude is generally on the order of 0.10–0.20 at 865 nm and 0.03–0.18 at 670 nm, although the full range of values is wider. For thick canopies, it may be interpreted in terms of foliage element (leaf) reflectance. Retrieved values are on the order of 0.4 in the near infrared and in the range 0.05–0.20 at 670 nm. At 440 nm, the amplitude of the signature is very small, as is expected from the small surface reflectance. This confirms that the atmospheric contribution to the reflectance increase at the backscattering direction is negligible.

[1]  B. Hapke,et al.  The cause of the hot spot in vegetation canopies and soils: Shadow-hiding versus coherent backscatter , 1996 .

[2]  S. Gerstl,et al.  Modeling of atmospheric effects on the angular distribution of a backscattering peak , 1988 .

[3]  Sylvain G. Leblanc,et al.  A four-scale bidirectional reflectance model based on canopy architecture , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[4]  Paul N. Woessner,et al.  Polarization of light scattered by clover , 1987 .

[5]  B. Hapke,et al.  The Opposition Effect of the Moon: The Contribution of Coherent Backscatter , 1993, Science.

[6]  Wenhan Qin,et al.  On the estimation of leaf size and crown geometry for tree canopies from hotspot observations , 1997 .

[7]  B. Hapke Bidirectional reflectance spectroscopy: 4. The extinction coefficient and the opposition effect , 1986 .

[8]  F. Baret,et al.  PROSPECT: A model of leaf optical properties spectra , 1990 .

[9]  P. Bicheron,et al.  Bidirectional reflectance distribution function signatures of major biomes observed from space , 2000 .

[10]  Stéphane Colzy,et al.  Cloud Detection from the Spaceborne POLDER Instrument and Validation against Surface Synoptic Observations , 1999 .

[11]  M. Leroy,et al.  Surface bidirectional reflectance distribution function observed at global scale by POLDER/ADEOS , 1998 .

[12]  Didier Tanré,et al.  Second Simulation of the Satellite Signal in the Solar Spectrum, 6S: an overview , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[13]  Qin Wenhan,et al.  Modeling bidirectional reflectance of multicomponent vegetation canopies , 1993 .

[14]  Annick Bricaud,et al.  The POLDER mission: instrument characteristics and scientific objectives , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[15]  Wenhan Qin,et al.  The hotspot effect in heterogeneous vegetation canopies and performances of various hotspot models , 1996 .

[16]  S. Gerstl,et al.  Radiation physics and modelling for off-nadir satellite sensing of non-Lambertian surfaces , 1986 .

[17]  I. F. Grant,et al.  First observation of the hot spot from space at sub-degree angular resolution using POLDER data , 2003 .

[18]  A. Belward,et al.  The IGBP-DIS global 1km land cover data set, DISCover: First results , 1997 .

[19]  A. Ishimaru,et al.  Retroreflectance from a dense distribution of spherical particles , 1984 .

[20]  Charles L. Walthall,et al.  Evidence of hot spot directional signature from airborne POLDER measurements , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[21]  J. Ross The radiation regime and architecture of plant stands , 1981, Tasks for vegetation sciences 3.

[22]  A. Strahler,et al.  A hotspot model for leaf canopies , 1991 .

[23]  Wenhan Qin,et al.  An evaluation of hotspot models for vegetation canopies , 1995 .

[24]  A. Kuusk,et al.  A reflectance model for the homogeneous plant canopy and its inversion , 1989 .

[25]  J. Roujean,et al.  A bidirectional reflectance model of the Earth's surface for the correction of remote sensing data , 1992 .

[26]  A. Kuusk A fast, invertible canopy reflectance model , 1995 .

[27]  Ranga B. Myneni,et al.  The hot spot of vegetation canopies , 1988 .

[28]  B. Pinty,et al.  A physical model of the bidirectional reflectance of vegetation canopies , 1990 .