String tension effects on tennis ball rebound speed and accuracy during playing conditions

The primary aim of this study was to determine whether variations in rebound speed and accuracy of a tennis ball could be detected during game-simulated conditions when using three rackets strung with three string tensions. Tennis balls were projected from a ball machine towards participants who attempted to stroke the ball cross-court into the opposing singles court. The rebound speed of each impact was measured using a radar gun located behind the baseline of the court. An observer also recorded the number of balls landing in, long, wide and in the net. It was found that rebound speeds for males (110.1 ± 10.2 km · h−1; mean ± s) were slightly higher than those of females (103.6 ± 8.6 km · h−1; P < 0.05) and that low string tensions (180 N) produced greater rebound speeds (108.1 ± 9.9 km · h−1) than high string tensions (280 N, 105.3 ± 9.6 km · h−1; P < 0.05). This finding is in line with laboratory results and theoretical predictions of other researchers. With respect to accuracy, the type of error made was significantly influenced by the string tension (P < 0.05). This was particularly evident when considering whether the ball travelled long or landed in the net. High string tension was more likely to result in a net error, whereas low string tension was more likely to result in the ball travelling long. It was concluded that both gender and the string tension influence the speed and accuracy of the tennis ball.

[1]  Rod Cross,et al.  Laboratory testing of tennis strings , 2000 .

[2]  Rod Cross,et al.  Measurements of string tension in a tennis racket , 2001 .

[3]  Gregory J. Welk,et al.  The Effects of String Type and Tension on Impact in Midsized and Oversized Tennis Racquets , 1987 .

[4]  R Cross,et al.  Player sensitivity to changes in string tension in a tennis racket. , 2003, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[5]  L. Noble,et al.  The effect of tennis racket string vibration dampers on racket handle vibrations and discomfort following impacts. , 1999, Journal of sports sciences.

[6]  R. Cross The sweet spots of a tennis racquet , 1999 .

[7]  Herbert Hatze The Relationship between the Coefficient of Restitution and Energy Losses in Tennis Rackets , 1993 .

[8]  Rod Cross,et al.  Flexible beam analysis of the effects of string tension and frame stiffness on racket performance , 2000 .

[9]  Rob Bower,et al.  Tennis racquet stiffness and string tension effects on rebound velocity and angle for an oblique impact , 1999 .

[10]  Crawford Lindsey,et al.  The physics and technology of tennis , 2004 .

[11]  H. Brody,et al.  Physics of the tennis racket , 1979 .

[12]  Bruce Elliott The Influence of Tennis Racket Flexibility and String Tension on Rebound Velocity Following a Dynamic Impact , 1982 .

[13]  J A Baker,et al.  The effect of tennis racket stiffness and string tension on ball velocity after impact. , 1978, Research quarterly.

[14]  Steve Haake,et al.  Ball spin generation for oblique impacts with a tennis racket , 2004 .

[15]  S Adali,et al.  Mathematical modelling and simulation of a tennis racket. , 1981, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.