Asymmetrical mismatch negativity in humans as determined by phonetic but not physical difference
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] E Uusipaikka,et al. Perceptual magnet effect in the light of behavioral and psychophysiological data. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[2] E. N. Sokolov,et al. Perception and the Conditioned Reflex , 1965 .
[3] R. Ilmoniemi,et al. Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses , 1997, Nature.
[4] Jacob Cohen. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.
[5] R Näätänen,et al. Pre-attentive detection of vowel contrasts utilizes both phonetic and auditory memory representations. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[6] G. Dehaene-Lambertz. Electrophysiological correlates of categorical phoneme perception in adults , 1997, Neuroreport.
[7] R. Näätänen,et al. Development of language-specific phoneme representations in the infant brain , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.
[8] R. Näätänen. Attention and brain function , 1992 .
[9] E. Yund,et al. Phonemes, intensity and attention: differential effects on the mismatch negativity (MMN). , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[10] Olli Aaltonen,et al. Event-related brain potentials and the perception of a phonetic continuum , 1987, Biological Psychology.
[11] P. Kuhl. Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.