Showing is sharing: building shared understanding in human-centered design teams with Dazzle

Human-centered design teams must integrate diverse individual perspectives into a shared understanding during conceptual design. The team's shared knowledge of their users becomes the basis for later design decisions. We conducted a formative study that shows how generic groupware is insufficient to support the transition from individual to collaborative creative work. We developed a set of design guidelines and implemented them in Dazzle, a collaborative shared display system for co-located design team meetings. Dazzle associates the action of showing information on the shared display with granting the rest of the team access to that information: showing is sharing. Dazzle also records a history of shown files. Team members can annotate this log using cross-platform synchronized clients. Teams of novice designers tested Dazzle over two consecutive sessions: the first focused on synthesizing user research, and the second focused on brainstorming. Dazzle was very effective at grounding team conversations about user research, but was used less for sharing information during brainstorming tasks. Items from the shared activity log were used as sources of inspiration and decision criteria during the brainstorming task. Future work includes additional support for active decision-making, and ambient feedback on design activity.

[1]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  ClearBoard: a seamless medium for shared drawing and conversation with eye contact , 1992, CHI.

[2]  Larry J. Leifer,et al.  Personal Electronic Notebook with Sharing , 1995, Proceedings 4th IEEE Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WET ICE '95).

[3]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[4]  Chris A McMahon,et al.  Information Access Diagrams: A Technique for Analyzing the Usage of Design Information , 1996 .

[5]  Kathryn Henderson,et al.  On Line and On Paper: Visual Representations, Visual Culture, and Computer Graphics in Design Engineering , 1998 .

[6]  Jakob E. Bardram,et al.  Designing for the Dynamics of Cooperative Work Activities , 1998 .

[7]  Eric Saund,et al.  Design and technology for Collaborage: collaborative collages of information on physical walls , 1999, UIST '99.

[8]  William C. Regli,et al.  A Survey of Design Rationale Systems: Approaches, Representation, Capture and Retrieval , 2000, Engineering with Computers.

[9]  M. Turner GROUPS AT WORK: THEORY AND RESEARCH , 2002 .

[10]  Anoop Gupta,et al.  Distributed meetings: a meeting capture and broadcasting system , 2002, MULTIMEDIA '02.

[11]  Adam M. Fass,et al.  MessyDesk and MessyBoard: two designs inspired by the goal of improving human memory , 2002, DIS '02.

[12]  Elizabeth D. Mynatt,et al.  Semi-public displays for small, co-located groups , 2003, CHI '03.

[13]  Brenda Laurel,et al.  Design Research: Methods and Perspectives , 2003 .

[14]  Alice M. Agogino,et al.  TIME VARIATION OF DESIGN “STORY TELLING” IN ENGINEERING DESIGN TEAMS , 2003 .

[15]  Kathy Ryall,et al.  UbiTable: Impromptu Face-to-Face Collaboration on Horizontal Interactive Surfaces , 2003, UbiComp.

[16]  Michael Boyle,et al.  PDAs and shared public displays: Making personal information public, and public information personal , 1999, Personal Technologies.

[17]  Ben J Hicks,et al.  An investigation into the use and content of the engineer's logbook , 2006 .

[18]  Brian J. Lee From Cognitive Artifacts to Social Artifacts: The iDeas Design Ecology , 2006 .

[19]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  TEAM STORM: demonstrating an interaction model for working with multiple ideas during creative group work , 2007, C&C '07.

[20]  Sara L. Beckman,et al.  Framing Innovation: Negotiating Shared Frames During Early Design Phases , 2007 .

[21]  Marcello Bastéa-Forte,et al.  Encouraging contribution to shared sketches in brainstorming meetings , 2007, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[22]  Robert DeLine,et al.  Let's go to the whiteboard: how and why software developers use drawings , 2007, CHI.

[23]  Alice M. Agogino,et al.  Design Team Framing: Paths and Principles , 2008 .

[24]  Wendy Ju,et al.  Range: exploring implicit interaction through electronic whiteboard design , 2008, CSCW.

[25]  Desney S. Tan,et al.  Impromptu: a new interaction framework for supporting collaboration in multiple display environments and its field evaluation for co-located software development , 2008, CHI.

[26]  Alice M. Agogino,et al.  Tangible interactions in a digital age: Medium and graphic visualization in design journals , 2009, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[27]  Hao Jiang,et al.  WeSpace: the design development and deployment of a walk-up and share multi-surface visual collaboration system , 2009, CHI.

[28]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  Understanding knowledge management practices for early design activity and its implications for reuse , 2009, CHI.

[29]  Björn Hartmann,et al.  Pictionaire: supporting collaborative design work by integrating physical and digital artifacts , 2010, CSCW '10.

[30]  Scott Carter,et al.  Let's go from the whiteboard: supporting transitions in work through whiteboard capture and reuse , 2010, CHI.

[31]  Harald Reiterer,et al.  AffinityTable - A Hybrid Surface for Supporting Affinity Diagramming , 2011, INTERACT.

[32]  Lora Oehlberg,et al.  A Descriptive Study of Designers’ Tools for Capturing, Reflecting on, and Sharing User Needs and Conceptual Designs , 2011 .

[33]  Jelle van Dijk,et al.  Traces in creative spaces , 2011, C&C '11.

[34]  Pattie Maes,et al.  MemTable: an integrated system for capture and recall of shared histories in group workspaces , 2011, CHI.

[35]  Michel Beaudouin-Lafon,et al.  Lessons learned from the WILD room, a multisurface interactive environment , 2011, IHM.

[36]  Guang Li,et al.  SketchComm: a tool to support rich and flexible asynchronous communication of early design ideas , 2012, CSCW.