Interpersonal perceptions and metaperceptions of relationship closeness, satisfaction and popularity: A relational and directional analysis

Relationship closeness, satisfaction in interaction, and popularity in mainland China was investigated using a methodological relational approach, which stresses the bidirectional nature of perceptions and metaperceptions. Two studies were conducted: one involving 164 dyads and the other 20 five-member groups; participants were college students of both sexes who were well acquainted with one another. Major results are: (i) liking perceptions and metaperceptions are predominately relational in nature; (ii) assumed reciprocities are not consistently larger than actual reciprocities; and (iii) directional congruence is modest for closeness, but high for satisfaction and popularity. These results are discussed in terms of methodological relationalism, particularly the construct of directionality.

[1]  Interpersonal Perceptions and Metaperceptions in Dialogic Action Therapy: A Relational Methodological Approach to Theory Construction , 2009 .

[2]  D. Ho,et al.  Indigenization and beyond: methodological relationalism in the study of personality across cultural traditions. , 2001, Journal of personality.

[3]  E. Diener,et al.  Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  Shigehiro Oishi,et al.  The predictive value of daily vs. retrospective well-being judgments in relationship stability , 2006 .

[5]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Do we know how much people like one another? , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  D. Sculli,et al.  Relationship dominance – Rethinking management theories from the perspective of methodological relationalism , 2001 .

[7]  Predicting Emotional Reactions After Being Harmed by Another , 2007 .

[8]  D. Ho,et al.  In search of the good life: a cultural odyssey in the East and West. , 2003, Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs.

[9]  M. Bond,et al.  Achieving relationship harmony in groups and its consequence for group performance , 2006 .

[10]  D. R. Lehman,et al.  Cultural variation in unrealistic optimism: Does the West feel more vulnerable than the East? , 1995 .

[11]  M. Bond,et al.  Pancultural explanations for life satisfaction: adding relationship harmony to self-esteem. , 1997 .

[12]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Do people know how others view them? An empirical and theoretical account. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  R. Ho,et al.  Knowledge is a Dangerous Thing: Authority Relations, Ideological Conservatism, and Creativity in Confucian-Heritage Cultures , 2008 .

[14]  J. Tedeschi,et al.  Anger, Blame, and Dimensions of Perceived Norm Violations: Culture, Gender, and Relationships , 2004 .

[15]  Scott D. Churchill.  “Be True to Your School”: An Open Letter to Students and Practitioners of Human Science Research , 2008 .

[16]  M. Levesque,et al.  Meta-accuracy among acquainted individuals: a social relations analysis of interpersonal perception and metaperception. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  M. Bond,et al.  Perceiving communion in the dyadic relationship of others , 2006 .

[18]  M. Bond,et al.  Toward Defining Situations Objectively , 2002 .