Fast handover solution for network-based distributed mobility management in intelligent transportation systems

The current IP mobility protocols are called centralized mobility management (CMM) solutions, in which all data traffic and management signaling messages must be forwarded to an anchor entity. In some vehicle scenarios, vehicles may move as a group from one roadside unit to another (i.e., after traffic lights or traffic jams). This causes data traffic and exchanged mobility messages to peak at the anchor entity and, consequently, affects the network performance. A new design paradigm aimed at addressing the anchor entity issue is called distributed mobility management (DMM); it is an IETF proposal that is still being actively discussed by the IETF DMM working group. Nevertheless, network-based DMM is designed based on the well-known network-based CMM protocol Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6). There is no significant difference between network-based DMM and PMIPv6 in terms of handover latency and packet loss. Because vehicles change their roadside unit frequently in this context, the IP addresses of mobile users (MUs) require fast IP handover management to configure a new IP address without disrupting ongoing sessions. Thus, this paper proposes the Fast handover for network-based DMM (FDMM) based on the Fast Handover for PMIPv6 (PFMIPv6). Several modifications to PFMIPv6 are required to adapt this protocol to DMM. This paper specifies the necessary extensions to support the scenario in which an MU has old IP flows and hence has multiple anchor entities. In addition, the analytic expressions required to evaluate and compare the handover performance of the proposed FDMM and the IETF network-based DMM have been derived. The numerical results show that FDMM outperforms the IETF network-based DMM in terms of handover latency, session recovery and packet loss at the cost of some extra signaling.

[1]  Nada Golmie,et al.  Fast Handover Latency Analysis in Proxy Mobile IPv6 , 2010, 2010 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference GLOBECOM 2010.

[2]  I.G.M.M. Niemegeers,et al.  An evaluation of location management procedures , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 3rd IEEE International Conference on Universal Personal Communications.

[3]  Basavaraj Patil,et al.  Proxy Mobile IPv6 , 2008, RFC.

[4]  Antonio de la Oliva,et al.  Analytic Evaluation and Experimental Validation of a Network-Based IPv6 Distributed Mobility Management Solution , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[5]  Fazirulhisyam Hashim,et al.  Design and evaluation of distributed and dynamic mobility management approach based on PMIPv6 and MIH protocols , 2015, Wirel. Networks.

[6]  Meryem Ouzzif,et al.  Performance Analysis on Network-Based Distributed Mobility Management , 2014, Wirel. Pers. Commun..

[7]  Antonio de la Oliva,et al.  A PMIPv6-based solution for Distributed Mobility Management , 2017 .

[8]  Yanghee Choi,et al.  An Adaptive Network Mobility Support Protocol in Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 Networks , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[9]  Younghan Kim,et al.  PMIPv6-based Distributed Mobility Management , 2015 .

[10]  Samuel Pierre,et al.  An Analytical Framework for Performance Evaluation of IPv6-Based mobility Management Protocols , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[11]  Lili Wang,et al.  Design, Implementation, and Performance Evaluation of Efficient PMIPv6 Based Mobile Multicast Sender Support Schemes , 2015, Mob. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Myung-Ki Shin,et al.  Mobility management for all-IP mobile networks: mobile IPv6 vs. proxy mobile IPv6 , 2008, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[13]  Andrew T. Campbell,et al.  P-MIP: Paging Extensions for Mobile IP , 2002, Mob. Networks Appl..

[14]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Movement-based location update and selective paging for PCS networks , 1996, TNET.

[15]  H. Anthony Chan,et al.  Requirements for Distributed Mobility Management , 2012, RFC.

[16]  Nada Golmie,et al.  Performance analysis of fast handover for proxy Mobile IPv6 , 2013, Inf. Sci..

[17]  Tai-Myung Chung,et al.  How much do we gain by introducing route optimization in Proxy Mobile IPv6 networks? , 2010, Ann. des Télécommunications.

[18]  Meryem Ouzzif,et al.  Comparative Cost Analysis on Global Mobility Management Schemes in IPv6 Mobile Networks , 2013, 2013 IEEE 77th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[19]  Rajeev Koodli Mobile IPv6 Fast Handovers , 2009, RFC.

[20]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  A Cross-Layer (Layer 2 + 3) Handoff Management Protocol for Next-Generation Wireless Systems , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[21]  Jean-Marie Bonnin,et al.  Dynamic tunneling for network-based distributed mobility management coexisting with PMIPv6 , 2013, 2013 IEEE 24th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC).

[22]  Hongke Zhang,et al.  Mobile multicast source support in PMIPv6 networks , 2013, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[23]  Hidetoshi Yokota,et al.  Runtime Local Mobility Anchor (LMA) Assignment Support for Proxy Mobile IPv6 , 2012, RFC.

[24]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Wireless communications - principles and practice , 1996 .

[25]  Jongpil Jeong,et al.  Performance Analysis of Cross-Layer Handoff Scheme in IP-Based Next-Generation Wireless Networks , 2013 .

[26]  Mohammed Atiquzzaman,et al.  Stochastic Properties and Application of City Section Mobility Model , 2009, GLOBECOM 2009 - 2009 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[27]  Li Yi,et al.  D-PMIPv6: A distributed mobility management scheme supported by data and control plane separation , 2013, Math. Comput. Model..

[28]  Antonio de la Oliva,et al.  A network-based localized mobility solution for Distributed Mobility Management , 2011, 2011 The 14th International Symposium on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications (WPMC).

[29]  Meryem Ouzzif,et al.  Distributed Mobility Management: Approaches and analysis , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC).

[30]  Rosdiadee Nordin,et al.  Proxy Mobile IPv6 Handover Management in Vehicular Networks: State of the Art, Taxonomy and Directions for Future Research , 2015, Wirel. Pers. Commun..

[31]  Jun Zheng,et al.  Performance modeling and analysis of IEEE 802.11 DCF based fair channel access for vehicle-to-roadside communication in a non-saturated state , 2014, Wireless Networks.

[32]  Mohammed Atiquzzaman,et al.  Cost analysis of mobility protocols , 2013, Telecommun. Syst..

[33]  Yuguang Fang Movement-Based Mobility Management and Trade Off Analysis for Wireless Mobile Networks , 2003, IEEE Trans. Computers.

[34]  Yi-Bing Lin Reducing location update cost in a PCS network , 1997, TNET.

[35]  Christian Bonnet,et al.  A hybrid centralized-Distributed Mobility Management for supporting highly mobile users , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[36]  Ji-Woong Choi,et al.  Enhanced Fast Handover for Network Mobility in Intelligent Transportation Systems , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[37]  Yanghee Choi,et al.  A Study on Performance of Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 in IP-Based Cellular Networks , 2004 .

[38]  Jouni Korhonen,et al.  Local Mobility Anchor (LMA) Discovery for Proxy Mobile IPv6 , 2011, RFC.

[39]  Tai-Myung Chung,et al.  Comparative Handover Performance Analysis of IPv6 Mobility Management Protocols , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[40]  Tracy Camp,et al.  A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research , 2002, Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput..

[41]  Tai-Myung Chung,et al.  Cost analysis of IP mobility management protocols for consumer mobile devices , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics.