How to improve laparoscopic access safety: ENDOTIP

To improve laparoscopic port safety, an observational study was conducted where tissue dynamics at port-site, during use of conventional push-through trocars, were analysed. Specific performance shaping factors (PSF) were identified that individually and collectively infer added risk to port creation. Having determined weaknesses of closed and open laparoscopic port insertion, a new interactive visual cannula insertion and removal system is presented and ergonomic instrument designed. This second generation access system avoids the identified PSFs and can anticipate danger. Error is recognised and corrected before patient harm occurs. With renewed interest in the US Congress to curb incidence of inadvertent medical error, endoscopists should revisit the fundamental first steps of laparoscopy, when more than half of all serious complications occur. Our culture of 'blaming the human' must evolve into a culture of safety and transparency, as inadvertent laparoscopic error is now less tolerated. Evidently, most serious laparoscopic access injuries are generally a system problem, and less of a surgeon or instrument issue.

[1]  N. Taffinder,et al.  Serious trocar accidents in laparoscopic surgery: a French survey of 103,852 operations. , 1996, Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy.

[2]  L. Mettler,et al.  Clinical Experience with an Optical Access Trocar in Gynecological Laparoscopy-Pelviscopy , 1997, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

[3]  F Pierre,et al.  Complications of laparoscopy: a prospective multicentre observational study , 1997, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[4]  [Complications of laparoscopy caused by trocars. Preliminary study from the national registry of the French Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy]. , 1997, Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction.

[5]  E. Reddick.  Avoiding laparoscopic complications. , 1993, Surgical technology international.

[6]  A. Ternamian.  Laparoscopy without trocars , 1997, Surgical Endoscopy.

[7]  G. Maislin,et al.  Measurement of the force necessary for laparoscopic trocar entry. , 1989, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[8]  Munro,et al.  Incisional hernia following laparoscopy: A survey of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists , 1995, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

[9]  Surgical complications of diagnostic and operative gynaecological laparoscopy: a series of 29,966 cases. , 1998 .

[10]  A. Cuschieri,et al.  Errors enacted during endoscopic surgery--a human reliability analysis. , 1998, Applied ergonomics.

[11]  C. Chapron,et al.  Major vascular injuries during gynecologic laparoscopy. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[12]  J. Jakimowicz.  Current state and trends in minimal access surgery in Europe. , 1995, Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh.

[13]  G. Fried,et al.  Risks of blind versus open approach to celiotomy for laparoscopic surgery. , 1993, Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy.

[14]  C. Chapron,et al.  Surgical complications of diagnostic and operative gynaecological laparoscopy: a series of 29,966 cases. , 1998, Human reproduction.

[15]  K. Semm,et al.  Safe insertion of trocars and the Veress needle using standard equipment and the 11 security steps , 1999 .

[16]  E C Pierce,et al.  Promoting patient safety by preventing medical error. , 1999, JAMA.

[17]  A. Trupka,et al.  Safe creation of pneumoperitoneum using an optical trocar , 1999, Surgical Endoscopy.

[18]  C. Chapron,et al.  Complications of gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. , 1995, Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology.

[19]  A. Ternamian.  A second‐generation laparoscopic port system: EndoTIPTM , 1999 .

[20]  M. Deitel,et al.  Endoscopic Threaded Imaging Port (EndoTIP) for Laparoscopy: Experience with Different Body Weights , 1999, Obesity surgery.

[21]  L. Leape.  Error in Medicine , 1994 .

[22]  R. Garry,et al.  Towards evidence‐based laparoscopic entry techniques: clinical problems and dilemmas , 1999 .

[23]  K. Kern,et al.  Malpractice litigation involving laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cost, cause, and consequences. , 1997, Archives of surgery.

[24]  A. Gurbuz,et al.  The acute abdomen in the pregnant patient , 1997, Surgical Endoscopy.

[25]  F. Lécuru,et al.  Morbidity in laparoscopic gynecological surgery , 1999, Surgical Endoscopy.

[26]  K W Kizer,et al.  Promoting patient safety by preventing medical error. , 1998, JAMA.

[27]  A. Ternamian.  A trocarless, reusable, visual-access cannula for safer laparoscopy; an update. , 1998, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

[28]  K. Glass,et al.  Entry force and intra-abdominal pressure associated with six laparoscopic trocar-cannula systems: a randomized comparison. , 1999, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[29]  Jakimowicz Jj.  Current state and trends in minimal access surgery in Europe. , 1995 .

[30]  M. Hashizume,et al.  Needle and trocar injury during laparoscopic surgery in Japan , 1997, Surgical Endoscopy.

[31]  Ann G. Lawthers,et al.  Relation between malpractice claims and adverse events due to negligence. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study III. , 1991 .

[32]  B. Böhm,et al.  Influence of different trocar tips on abdominal wall penetration during laparoscopy , 1998, Surgical Endoscopy.

[33]  N M Laird,et al.  Relation between malpractice claims and adverse events due to negligence. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study III. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.